A cyclic oligonucleotide signaling pathway in type III CRISPR-Cas systems

Bacterial defense amplification Prokaryotic type III CRISPR systems use the effector complex and additional proteins such as Csm6 to destroy both the genome and the transcripts of invaders. However, how the effector complex and Csm6 coordinate CRISPR activity remains a mystery. Kazlauskiene et al. found that a cyclic oligonucleotide–based signaling pathway can regulate the defense response (see the Perspective by Amitai and Sorek). Upon target recognition, the Cas10 subunit of the effector complex synthesizes cyclic oligoadenylates, which act as second messengers to initiate and amplify the nuclease activity of Csm6. Science, this issue p. 605; see also p. 550 Cyclic oligoadenylates are signaling molecules that regulate type III-A CRISPR systems to provide full antiviral immunity in bacteria. Type III CRISPR-Cas systems in prokaryotes provide immunity against invading nucleic acids through the coordinated degradation of transcriptionally active DNA and its transcripts by the Csm effector complex. The Cas10 subunit of the complex contains an HD nuclease domain that is responsible for DNA degradation and two Palm domains with elusive functions. In addition, Csm6, a ribonuclease that is not part of the complex, is also required to provide full immunity. We show here that target RNA binding by the Csm effector complex of Streptococcus thermophilus triggers Cas10 to synthesize cyclic oligoadenylates (cAn; n = 2 to 6) by means of the Palm domains. Acting as signaling molecules, cyclic oligoadenylates bind Csm6 to activate its nonspecific RNA degradation. This cyclic oligoadenylate–based signaling pathway coordinates different components of CRISPR-Cas to prevent phage infection and propagation.

[1]  M. Jinek,et al.  Structural basis for the endoribonuclease activity of the type III-A CRISPR-associated protein Csm6 , 2016, RNA.

[2]  W. Guo,et al.  Crystal structures of CRISPR-associated Csx3 reveal a manganese-dependent deadenylation exoribonuclease , 2015, RNA biology.

[3]  Luciano A. Marraffini,et al.  Degradation of Phage Transcripts by CRISPR-Associated RNases Enables Type III CRISPR-Cas Immunity , 2016, Cell.

[4]  Johannes Söding,et al.  The HHpred interactive server for protein homology detection and structure prediction , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[5]  Jie Zhou,et al.  Cyclic dinucleotide (c-di-GMP, c-di-AMP, and cGAMP) signalings have come of age to be inhibited by small molecules. , 2016, Chemical communications.

[6]  Scott Bailey,et al.  RNA-activated DNA cleavage by the Type III-B CRISPR-Cas effector complex. , 2016, Genes & development.

[7]  Česlovas Venclovas,et al.  Spatiotemporal Control of Type III-A CRISPR-Cas Immunity: Coupling DNA Degradation with the Target RNA Recognition. , 2016, Molecular cell.

[8]  U. Baumann,et al.  An efficient one-step site-directed and site-saturation mutagenesis protocol. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[9]  B. Oh,et al.  Crystal structure and nucleic acid‐binding activity of the CRISPR‐associated protein Csx1 of Pyrococcus furiosus , 2013, Proteins.

[10]  R. Terns,et al.  The CRISPR-associated Csx1 protein of Pyrococcus furiosus is an adenosine-specific endoribonuclease , 2016, RNA.

[11]  Alan R. Davidson,et al.  Multiple mechanisms for CRISPR–Cas inhibition by anti-CRISPR proteins , 2015, Nature.

[12]  E. Koonin,et al.  Coupling immunity and programmed cell suicide in prokaryotes: Life‐or‐death choices , 2016, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[13]  C. Lawrence,et al.  Recognition of a pseudo-symmetric RNA tetranucleotide by Csx3, a new member of the CRISPR associated Rossmann fold superfamily , 2016, RNA biology.

[14]  Česlovas Venclovas,et al.  Type III CRISPR-Cas Immunity: Major Differences Brushed Aside. , 2017, Trends in microbiology.

[15]  M. F. White,et al.  CARF and WYL domains: ligand-binding regulators of prokaryotic defense systems , 2014, Front. Genet..

[16]  T. Osawa,et al.  Crystal structure of the Cmr2-Cmr3 subcomplex in the CRISPR-Cas RNA silencing effector complex. , 2013, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  Conrad C. Huang,et al.  UCSF Chimera—A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[18]  Y. Tong,et al.  An easy-to-use site-directed mutagenesis method with a designed restriction site for convenient and reliable mutant screening , 2009, Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B.

[19]  Joshua R. Elmore,et al.  Bipartite recognition of target RNAs activates DNA cleavage by the Type III-B CRISPR–Cas system , 2016, Genes & development.

[20]  Y. Chernajovsky,et al.  An interferon-induced phosphodiesterase degrading (2'-5') oligoisoadenylate and the C-C-A terminus of tRNA. , 1979, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  R. Terns,et al.  Structure of the Cmr2 subunit of the CRISPR-Cas RNA silencing complex. , 2012, Structure.

[22]  Aurélien Grosdidier,et al.  SwissDock, a protein-small molecule docking web service based on EADock DSS , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..

[23]  Eric S. Lander,et al.  C2c2 is a single-component programmable RNA-guided RNA-targeting CRISPR effector , 2016, Science.

[24]  H. Yoshino,et al.  Substrate Specificity of Nuclease P1 , 1974 .

[25]  Luciano A. Marraffini,et al.  Co-transcriptional DNA and RNA Cleavage during Type III CRISPR-Cas Immunity , 2015, Cell.

[26]  Ceslovas Venclovas,et al.  Programmable RNA shredding by the type III-A CRISPR-Cas system of Streptococcus thermophilus. , 2014, Molecular cell.

[27]  J. Doudna,et al.  RNA and DNA Targeting by a Reconstituted Thermus thermophilus Type III-A CRISPR-Cas System , 2017, PloS one.

[28]  Koichi Yoshioka,et al.  KyPlot – A User-oriented Tool for Statistical Data Analysis and Visualization , 2002, Comput. Stat..

[29]  E. Koonin,et al.  Comprehensive analysis of the HEPN superfamily: identification of novel roles in intra-genomic conflicts, defense, pathogenesis and RNA processing , 2013, Biology Direct.

[30]  K. Ye,et al.  Crystal structure of Cmr2 suggests a nucleotide cyclase‐related enzyme in type III CRISPR‐Cas systems , 2012, FEBS letters.

[31]  Eugene V Koonin,et al.  Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin and evolution of CRISPR-Cas systems , 2011, Biology Direct.

[32]  R. Silverman,et al.  A scientific journey through the 2-5A/RNase L system. , 2007, Cytokine & growth factor reviews.

[33]  Yang Zhang,et al.  Atomic-level protein structure refinement using fragment-guided molecular dynamics conformation sampling. , 2011, Structure.

[34]  T. Blundell,et al.  Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[35]  J. Tainer,et al.  The structure of the CRISPR-associated protein Csa3 provides insight into the regulation of the CRISPR/Cas system. , 2011, Journal of molecular biology.

[36]  Yue Zheng,et al.  Cyclic Dinucleotide (c‐di‐GMP, c‐di‐AMP, and cGAMP) Signalings Have Come of Age to Be Inhibited by Small Molecules , 2016 .

[37]  Johannes Söding,et al.  Protein homology detection by HMM?CHMM comparison , 2005, Bioinform..

[38]  L. Aravind,et al.  Comparative genomic analyses reveal a vast, novel network of nucleotide-centric systems in biological conflicts, immunity and signaling , 2015, Nucleic acids research.

[39]  Eugene V Koonin,et al.  The basic building blocks and evolution of CRISPR-CAS systems. , 2013, Biochemical Society transactions.