The application of ultrasound as a rapid method to provide DNA fragments suitable for detection by DNA biosensors.

Contamination of food and water supplies by microorganisms such as Escherichia coli, the need for point-of-care bedside analysis of biological samples, and concerns about terrorist attacks using biological organisms, have made the development of fast, reliable, and sensitive analytical methodologies for use in monitoring of pathogens very important. With a variety of biosensors being developed for extremely sensitive and rapid nucleic acid diagnostics, it has become even more important to shift focus towards creation of methods to decrease the amount of time and effort necessary for sample preparation. The application of ultrasound has the potential to create DNA fragments from genomic material with lengths that are suitable for determination using biosensors and microarrays. For example, application of 85 W power at a frequency of 20 kHz can produce a preponderance of fragments of 100-400 base pairs (bp) within several seconds, and sample processing can lead to over 75% conversion from genomic material to fragments in times of 20-30 s. A proportion of these fragments are in a single-stranded state and are suitable for hydridization with immobilized single-stranded DNA probe oligonucleotides using a fiber optic biosensor. Control of factors such as salt concentration, exposure time, ultrasound power, and the initial temperature of the solution, can affect the length and form (single- or double-stranded) of DNA fragments that are generated by ultrasound, and average fragment length can be adjusted by selection of these operating parameters.

[1]  A. Henglein,et al.  Sonochemistry : historical developments and modern aspects , 1987 .

[2]  L. Jones,et al.  Characterization of SYBR Gold nucleic acid gel stain: a dye optimized for use with 300-nm ultraviolet transilluminators. , 1999, Analytical biochemistry.

[3]  Nigel J. Walker,et al.  A Technique Whose Time Has Come , 2002, Science.

[4]  Magdi M. Mossoba,et al.  Chemical effects of ultrasound on aqueous solutions. Formation of hydroxyl radicals and hydrogen atoms , 1983 .

[5]  E. B. Lindblad,et al.  Ultrasonic degradation of DNA. , 1989, DNA.

[6]  D. Squirrell,et al.  Gene probe assays on a fibre-optic evanescent wave biosensor. , 1992, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[7]  Morton W. Miller,et al.  A review of in vitro bioeffects of inertial ultrasonic cavitation from a mechanistic perspective. , 1996, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[8]  C. Donnelly,et al.  Listeria monocytogenes: a continuing challenge. , 2009, Nutrition reviews.

[9]  K. Yamaoka,et al.  Ultrasonic Scission of Deoxyribonucleic Acid in Aqueous Solution II. Precipitational Fractionation and Molecular Weights of Sonicated Samples , 1986 .

[10]  P. Piunno,et al.  Fiber-optic DNA sensor for fluorometric nucleic acid determination. , 1995, Analytical chemistry.

[11]  Michael B. Thompson,et al.  Interfacial Nucleic Acid Hybridization Studied by Random Primer 32P Labeling and Liquid-Phase Acoustic Network Analysis , 1994 .

[12]  G. Cooper The Cell: A Molecular Approach , 1996 .

[13]  P. Riesz,et al.  Free radical formation induced by ultrasound and its biological implications. , 1992, Free radical biology & medicine.

[14]  H. Thorp,et al.  Modification of indium tin oxide electrodes with repeat polynucleotides: electrochemical detection of trinucleotide repeat expansion. , 2001, Analytical chemistry.

[15]  K. Mullis,et al.  Enzymatic amplification of beta-globin genomic sequences and restriction site analysis for diagnosis of sickle cell anemia. , 1985, Science.

[16]  P. Boyer,et al.  CHEMICAL MECHANISM OF SONIC, ACID, ALKALINE AND ENZYMIC DEGRADATION OF DNA. , 1965, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  I. Tinoco Nucleic Acid Structures, Energetics, and Dynamics , 1996 .

[18]  M. Thompson,et al.  Interfacial nucleic acid chemistry studied by acoustic shear wave propagation , 2002 .

[19]  G. Schmidt-naake,et al.  Combination of Mechanochemical Degradation of Polymers with Controlled Free‐Radical Polymerization , 2002 .

[20]  D. Freifelder,et al.  Studies on the sonic degradation of deoxyribonucleic acid. , 1962, Biophysical journal.

[21]  R. Georgiadis,et al.  Quantitative measurements and modeling of kinetics in nucleic acid monolayer films using SPR spectroscopy , 2000 .

[22]  Kentaro Tanaka,et al.  A DNA-lipid complex in organic media and formation of an aligned cast film , 1996 .

[23]  A. Gocht,et al.  A young woman with persistent hypoglycemia, rhabdomyolysis, and coma: Recognizing fatty acid oxidation defects in adults , 2003, Critical care medicine.

[24]  Ulrich J. Krull,et al.  Direct selective detection of genomic DNA from coliform using a fiber optic biosensor , 2002 .

[25]  J. H. Todd Measurement of chemical activity of ultrasonic cavitation in aqueous solutions , 1970 .

[26]  Joseph Wang,et al.  Electrochemical nucleic acid biosensors , 2002 .

[27]  Alexander W Peterson,et al.  Hybridization of mismatched or partially matched DNA at surfaces. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[28]  T. Leighton The Acoustic Bubble , 1994 .

[29]  Anthony G. Frutos,et al.  Surface plasmon resonance imaging measurements of DNA hybridization adsorption and streptavidin/DNA multilayer formation at chemically modified gold surfaces , 1997 .

[30]  I. Tinoco,et al.  Absorbance melting curves of RNA. , 1989, Methods in enzymology.

[31]  B. Limoges,et al.  Hybridization assay at a disposable electrochemical biosensor for the attomole detection of amplified human cytomegalovirus DNA. , 2000, Analytical biochemistry.

[32]  A. Dijkstra,et al.  Evaluation and optimization of laboratory methods and analytical procedures: A survey of statistical and mathematical techniques , 1978 .

[33]  Henry A. Erlich,et al.  Enzymatic amplification of ?-globin genomic sequences and restriction site analysis for diagnosis of , 1985 .

[34]  D. Graves,et al.  The biophysics of DNA hybridization with immobilized oligonucleotide probes. , 1995, Biophysical journal.

[35]  K. M. Millan,et al.  Voltammetric DNA biosensor for cystic fibrosis based on a modified carbon paste electrode. , 1994, Analytical chemistry.

[36]  P. Piunno,et al.  Influences of non-selective interactions of nucleic acids on response rates of nucleic acid fiber optic biosensors , 2001, Fresenius' journal of analytical chemistry.

[37]  K. Suslick,et al.  The sonochemical hot spot , 1987 .

[38]  A. Peacocke,et al.  The ultrasonic degradation of biological macromolecules under conditions of stable cavitation. I. Theory, methods, and application to deoxyribonucleic acid , 1966 .

[39]  A. Peacocke,et al.  The ultrasonic degradation of biological macromolecules under conditions of stable cavitation. II. Degradation of deoxyribonucleic acid , 1968, Biopolymers.