Produced water treatment by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes

Produced water, water that is co-produced during oil and gas manufacturing, represents the largest source of oily wastewaters. Given high oil and gas prices, oil and gas production from non-conventional sources such as tar sands, oil shale and coal bed methane will continue to expand resulting in large quantities of impaired produced water. Treatment of this produced water could improve the economic viability of these oil and gas fields and lead to a new source of water for beneficial use. Two nanofiltration and one low-pressure reverse osmosis membrane have been tested using three produced waters from Colorado, USA. The membranes were analyzed before and after produced water filtration using field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). In addition, membrane–water contact angles have been measured. XPS data indicate adsorption of organic and inorganic species during filtration. FESEM and ATR-FTIR data support theses findings. Water contact angles indicate the effect of membrane hydrophilicity on fouling. Our results highlight the value of using multiple surface characterization methods with different depths of penetration in order to determine membrane fouling. Depending on the quality of the produced water and the water quality requirements for the beneficial uses being considered, nanofiltration may be a viable process for produced water treatment. © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

[1]  Ashish Kulkarni,et al.  Flux enhancement by hydrophilization of thin film composite reverse osmosis membranes , 1996 .

[2]  A. Fane,et al.  A fundamental study of the ultrafiltration of oil-water emulsions☆ , 1988 .

[3]  P. Natrajan,et al.  Feasibility of using natural zeolites to remove sodium from coal bed methane-produced water , 2006 .

[4]  Nandakishore Rajagopalan,et al.  Membrane processing of oily streams. Wastewater treatment and waste reduction , 1998 .

[5]  R. Holdich,et al.  The rejection of oil by microfiltration of a stabilised kerosene/water emulsion , 2000 .

[6]  R. Field,et al.  Cross–flow and dead–end microfiltration of oily–water emulsion. Part II: Mechanisms and modelling of flux decline , 2000 .

[7]  Kuruvilla Mathew,et al.  Appropriate Technology Hygiene Facility for Small Communities , 1991 .

[8]  B. Bruggen,et al.  Characterization of polymeric nanofiltration membranes for systematic analysis of membrane performance , 2006 .

[9]  J. Drewes,et al.  Viability of nanofiltration and ultra-low pressure reverse osmosis membranes for multi-beneficial use of methane produced water , 2006 .

[10]  D. Bhattacharyya,et al.  Ultrafiltration Characteristics of Oil-Detergent Water Systems: Membrane Fouling Mechanisms. , 1979 .

[11]  Ashish Kulkarni,et al.  Chemical treatment for improved performance of reverse osmosis membranes , 1996 .

[12]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Role of membrane surface morphology in colloidal fouling of cellulose acetate and composite aromatic polyamide reverse osmosis membranes , 1997 .

[13]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Probing the nano- and micro-scales of reverse osmosis membranes—A comprehensive characterization of physiochemical properties of uncoated and coated membranes by XPS, TEM, ATR-FTIR, and streaming potential measurements , 2007 .

[14]  S. V. Joshi,et al.  Fouling resistant membranes in desalination and water recovery , 2005 .

[15]  M. G. Biesinger,et al.  Industrial experience with dissolved-air flotation , 1974 .

[16]  V. Freger,et al.  TFC polyamide membranes modified by grafting of hydrophilic polymers: an FT-IR/AFM/TEM study , 2002 .

[17]  S. Kok,et al.  The Use of Micro/Ultrafiltration for the Removal of Oil and Suspended Solids from Oilfield Brines , 1992 .

[18]  Robert H. Davis,et al.  Crossflow microfiltration of oily water , 1997 .

[19]  R. Silverstein,et al.  Spectrometric identification of organic compounds , 2013 .

[20]  N. Mex,et al.  Water Produced with Coal-Bed Methane , 2000 .

[21]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Influence of membrane surface properties on initial rate of colloidal fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes , 2001 .

[22]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by humic acid—Effects of solution composition and hydrodynamic conditions , 2007 .

[23]  Viatcheslav Freger,et al.  Nanoscale Heterogeneity of Polyamide Membranes Formed by Interfacial Polymerization , 2003 .

[24]  Nadia A. Mohamed,et al.  Structure-property relationships for novel wholly aromatic polyamide-hydrazides containing various proportions of para-phenylene and meta-phenylene units. III. Preparation and properties of semi-permeable membranes for water desalination by reverse osmosis separation performance , 2003 .

[25]  Soo-Bok Lee,et al.  Concentration polarization, membrane fouling and cleaning in ultrafiltration of soluble oil , 1984 .

[26]  S. Bhattacharjee,et al.  Effect of Membrane Surface Roughness on Colloid−Membrane DLVO Interactions , 2003 .

[27]  Toraj Mohammadi,et al.  Modeling of membrane fouling and flux decline in reverse osmosis during separation of oil in water emulsions , 2003 .