Flood forecasting with a watershed model: a new method of parameter updating

Abstract Flood forecasting is of prime importance when it comes to reducing the possible number of lives lost to storm-induced floods. Because rainfall-runoff models are far from being perfect, hydrologists need to continuously update outputs from the rainfall-runoff model they use, in order to adapt to the actual emergency situation. This paper introduces a new updating procedure that can be combined with conceptual rainfall-runoff models for flood forecasting purposes. Conceptual models are highly nonlinear and cannot easily accommodate theoretically optimal methods such as Kalman filtering. Most methods developed so far mainly update the states of the system, i.e. the contents of the reservoirs involved in the rainfall-runoff model. The new parameter updating method proves to be superior to a standard error correction method on four watersheds whose floods can cause damage to the greater Paris area. Moreover, further developments of the approach are possible, especially along the idea of combining parameter updating with assimilation of additional data such as soil moisture data from field measurements and/or from remote sensing.

[1]  P. Kitanidis,et al.  Real‐time forecasting with a conceptual hydrologic model: 2. Applications and results , 1980 .

[2]  Roman Krzysztofowicz,et al.  A theory of flood warning systems , 1993 .

[3]  V. Singh,et al.  Application of the Kalman filter to the Nash model , 1998 .

[4]  A. Shamseldin,et al.  Methods for combining the outputs of different rainfall–runoff models , 1997 .

[5]  Peter K. Kitanidis,et al.  Real‐time forecasting with a conceptual hydrologic model: 1. Analysis of uncertainty , 1980 .

[6]  Nilo Nascimento,et al.  GR3J: a daily watershed model with three free parameters , 1999 .

[7]  Rob Lamb,et al.  Calibration of a conceptual rainfall‐runoff model for flood frequency estimation by continuous simulation , 1999 .

[8]  Slobodan P. Simonovic,et al.  Short term streamflow forecasting using artificial neural networks , 1998 .

[9]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Combining Hydrologic Forecasts , 1987 .

[10]  Ezio Todini,et al.  Comment upon the residual mass curve coefficient , 1975 .

[11]  Juan B. Valdés,et al.  Streamflow Forecasting for Han River Basin, Korea , 1994 .

[12]  Eric F. Wood,et al.  REAL-TIME FORECASTING. , 1985 .

[13]  B. Troutman.  Errors and Parameter Estimation in Precipitation‐Runoff Modeling: 1. Theory , 1985 .

[14]  Peter K. Kitanidis,et al.  Adaptive filtering through detection of isolated transient errors in rainfall‐runoff models , 1980 .

[15]  R. J. Moore,et al.  Real-Time Flood Forecasting Systems: Perspectives and Prospects , 1999 .

[16]  Robin T. Clarke,et al.  Rainfall-based real-time flood forecasting , 1992 .

[17]  R. T. Clarke,et al.  Adaptive hydrological forecasting—a review / Revue des méthodes de prévision hydrologique ajustables , 1981 .

[18]  A. Shamseldin,et al.  A real-time combination method for the outputs of different rainfall-runoff models , 1999 .

[19]  Marco Borga,et al.  Adaptive Use of a Conceptual Model for Real Time Flood Forecasting , 1997 .

[20]  Jens Christian Refsgaard,et al.  Validation and Intercomparison of Different Updating Procedures for Real-Time Forecasting , 1997 .

[21]  Luis Garrote,et al.  A distributed model for real-time flood forecasting using digital elevation models , 1995 .

[22]  Armando Brath,et al.  Adaptive calibration of a conceptual model for flash flood forecasting , 1993 .

[23]  Dou Long,et al.  Reliability of Flood Warning Systems , 1994 .

[24]  R. Mein,et al.  Sensitivity of optimized parameters in watershed models , 1978 .