Development and Use of a Framework for Characterising Computer Models of Silvoarable Economics

A review of existing computer models of silvoarable 1 economics was undertaken for a project, entitled Silvoarable Agroforestry for Europe (SAFE), which aims to reduce uncertainty regarding the introduction and management of silvoarable systems in Europe. Because the published literature describing and comparing such models is sparse, a framework was developed and then used to characterise five computer models: POPMOD, ARBUSTRA, the Agroforestry Estate Model, WaNuLCAS, and the Agroforestry Calculator. Key characteristics described for each model were the background, systems modelled, objective of the economic analysis, economic viewpoint, spatial and temporal scales, generation and use of biophysical data, model platform and interface, and input requirements and outputs. Each of the models could produce a partial budget of the profitability of a silvoarable, arable, or forestry system at a one-hectare level using discounted cost–benefit analysis. Whilst the research models undertook the analysis from a viewpoint of a generic farmer, models developed for decision-support also included appraisals from the perspectives of tenants, share-croppers, and participants in a joint-venture. The two farm-scale models, ARBUSTRA and the Agroforestry Estate Model, could also be used to examine the feasibility of silvoarable systems on an existing business, and to determine the effects of heterogeneous land types and phased planting. The framework allows users to identify the pertinent issues for selecting or developing a particular model.

[1]  Guillermo A. Mendoza,et al.  Multiple objective programming: An approach to planning and evaluation of agroforestry systems: Part 2—An illustrative example and analysis , 1987 .

[2]  D. Mercer,et al.  Socioeconomic research in agroforestry: progress, prospects, priorities , 2004, Agroforestry Systems.

[3]  Robin Matthews,et al.  Low External Input Technologies for Livelihood Improvement in Subsistence Agriculture , 2004 .

[4]  P. Nair An introduction to agroforestry. , 1993 .

[5]  M. van Noordwijk,et al.  WaNuLCAS, a model of water, nutrient and light capture in agroforestry systems , 2004, Agroforestry Systems.

[6]  D. Silburn,et al.  Erosion/productivity modelling of maize farming in the Philippine uplands: Part I: parameterising the Agricultural Production Systems Simulator , 1998 .

[7]  Robin Matthews,et al.  Crop-Soil Simulation Models: Applications in Developing Countries , 2002 .

[8]  T. H. Thomas,et al.  A spreadsheet approach to the economic modelling of agroforestry systems , 1991 .

[9]  J. Passioura Simulation Models: Science, Snake Oil, Education, or Engineering? , 1996 .

[10]  C. Ong,et al.  Can the ecosystem mimic hypotheses be applied to farms in African savannahs? , 1999, Agroforestry Systems.

[11]  H. van Keulen,et al.  The 'School of de Wit' crop growth simulation models: a pedigree and historical overview. , 1996 .

[12]  P. Nair Classification of agroforestry systems , 2004, Agroforestry Systems.

[13]  C. Chaya,et al.  Effects of the measures envisaged in "Agenda 2000" on arable crop producers and beef and veal producers : an application of positive mathematical programming to representative farms of a Spanish region , 2001 .

[14]  R. Loomis,et al.  Maximum Crop Productivity: An Extimate 1 , 1963 .

[15]  T. H. Thomas,et al.  Poplar agroforestry: a re-evaluation of its economic potential on arable land in the United Kingdom , 1993 .

[16]  J. O. Akintola,et al.  PROFITABILITY OF CASSAVA–MAIZE PRODUCTION UNDER DIFFERENT FALLOW SYSTEMS AND LAND-USE INTENSITIES IN THE DERIVED SAVANNA OF SOUTHWEST NIGERIA , 2002, Experimental Agriculture.

[17]  Rob Cramb,et al.  Erosion/productivity modelling of maize farming in the Philippine uplands part III: Economic analysis of alternative farming methods , 1998 .