Adaptive radiotherapy in lung cancer: dosimetric benefits and clinical outcome.

OBJECTIVE Anatomical changes during radiotherapy (RT) might introduce discrepancies between planned and delivered doses. This study evaluates the need for adaptive treatment in lung cancer RT. METHODS 15 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer, undergoing radical RT with or without concurrent chemotherapy, consecutively underwent planning CT scans at baseline and after 44-46 Gy. Target volumes were delineated on both scans. Phase I delivered 44-46 Gy to the initial planning target volume (PTV). Two Phase II plans for 16-20 Gy were developed on initial and mid-treatment scans, the treatment being delivered with the mid-treatment plan. The second CT structure set was fused with the initial scan data set using dose wash. Volumetric and dosimetric changes in target volumes and critical structures were assessed. RESULTS There was significant reduction in primary gross tumour volume (34.00%; p = 0.02) and PTV (34.70%; p < 0.01) in the second scan. In Plan 2, delivering the same dose to the initial PTV would have resulted in a significantly higher dose to the lung PTV (V20, 52.18%; V5, 21.76%; mean, 23.93%), contralateral lung (mean, 29.43%), heart (V10, 81.47%; V5, 56.62%; mean, 35.21%) and spinal cord (maximum dose, 37.53%). CONCLUSION Treatment replanning can account for anatomical changes during RT and thereby enable better normal tissue sparing, while allowing radical target doses with the possibility of maximizing local control. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE This study supports the sparse dosimetric data regarding the quantitative tumour volume reduction, re-emphasizing the need for adaptive replanning for minimizing normal tissue toxicity without compromising local control, and adds to the existing body of literature.

[1]  R. Arriagada,et al.  Astro plenary: Effect of chemotherapy on locally advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma: A randomized study of 353 patients , 1991 .

[2]  R K Ten Haken,et al.  Dose-volume histogram and 3-D treatment planning evaluation of patients with pneumonitis. , 1994, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  J. Herndon,et al.  Improved survival in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: seven-year follow-up of cancer and leukemia group B (CALGB) 8433 trial. , 1996, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[4]  J A Purdy,et al.  Clinical dose-volume histogram analysis for pneumonitis after 3D treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  W. Curran,et al.  Final Results of Phase III Trial in Regionally Advanced Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer : Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, and Southwest Oncology Group , 2000 .

[6]  Y. Bang,et al.  A Phase III Randomized Trial of Combined Chemoradiotherapy Versus Radiotherapy Alone in Locally Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer , 2002, American journal of clinical oncology.

[7]  Di Yan,et al.  Potential for reduced toxicity and dose escalation in the treatment of inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer: a comparison of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), 3D conformal radiation, and elective nodal irradiation. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  J. Hayman,et al.  NTCP modeling for acute esophagitis in patients treated with conformal radiation therapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) , 2004 .

[9]  Joos V Lebesque,et al.  Dose heterogeneity in the target volume and intensity-modulated radiotherapy to escalate the dose in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  Jeffrey Bradley,et al.  Toxicity and outcome results of RTOG 9311: a phase I-II dose-escalation study using three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung carcinoma. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  R. T. Ten Haken,et al.  High-dose radiation improved local tumor control and overall survival in patients with inoperable/unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer: long-term results of a radiation dose escalation study. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  R. T. Ten Haken,et al.  Normal tissue complication probability modeling for acute esophagitis in patients treated with conformal radiation therapy for non-small cell lung cancer. , 2005, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[13]  Randall K Ten Haken,et al.  Final toxicity results of a radiation-dose escalation study in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): predictors for radiation pneumonitis and fibrosis. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  J. Lebesque,et al.  Final results of a Phase I/II dose escalation trial in non-small-cell lung cancer using three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  Slav Yartsev,et al.  Adaptive radiotherapy planning on decreasing gross tumor volumes as seen on megavoltage computed tomography images. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  W. Curran,et al.  Concomitant radio-chemotherapy (RT-CT) versus sequential RT-CT in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A meta-analysis using individual patient data (IPD) from randomised clinical trials (RCTs): A1-05 , 2007 .

[17]  George Starkschall,et al.  Assessment of gross tumor volume regression and motion changes during radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer as measured by four-dimensional computed tomography. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  L. Schwartz,et al.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). , 2009, European journal of cancer.

[19]  John Wong,et al.  Quantification of tumor volume changes during radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  S. Senan,et al.  Role of adaptive radiotherapy during concomitant chemoradiotherapy for lung cancer: analysis of data from a prospective clinical trial. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  Matthias Guckenberger,et al.  Potential of adaptive radiotherapy to escalate the radiation dose in combined radiochemotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  Xiuping Ding,et al.  Feasibility of shrinking field radiation therapy through 18F-FDG PET/CT after 40 Gy for stage III non-small cell lung cancers. , 2012, Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP.

[23]  W. Curran,et al.  A randomized phase III comparison of standard-dose (60 Gy) versus high-dose (74 Gy) conformal chemoradiotherapy with or without cetuximab for stage III non-small cell lung cancer: Results on radiation dose in RTOG 0617. , 2013 .