User Interface Tradeoffs for Remote Deictic Gesturing

Telepresence robots can help to connect people by providing videoconferencing and navigation abilities in faraway environments. Despite this potential, current commercial telepresence robots lack certain nonverbal expressive abilities that are important for permitting the operator to communicate effectively in the remote environment. To help improve the utility of telepresence robots, we added an expressive, non-manipulating arm to our custom telepresence robot system and developed three user interfaces to control deictic gesturing by the arm: onscreen, dial-based, and skeleton tracking methods. A usability study helped us to evaluate user presence feelings, task load, preferences, and opinions while performing deictic gestures with the robot arm during a mock order packing task. The majority of participants preferred the dial-based method of controlling the robot, and survey responses revealed differences in physical demand and effort level across user interfaces. These results can guide robotics researchers interested in extending the nonverbal communication abilities of telepresence robots.

[1]  Morgan Quigley,et al.  ROS: an open-source Robot Operating System , 2009, ICRA 2009.

[2]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Telerobotics, Automation, and Human Supervisory Control , 2003 .

[3]  Jit Seng Tan,et al.  Caring for Dependent Older Persons , 2018 .

[4]  Florian Gosselin,et al.  Design of a High Fidelity Haptic Device for Telesurgery , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[5]  Bilge Mutlu,et al.  Modeling and Evaluating Narrative Gestures for Humanlike Robots , 2013, Robotics: Science and Systems.

[6]  Leila Takayama,et al.  "Now, i have a body": uses and social norms for mobile remote presence in the workplace , 2011, CHI.

[7]  P. Haggard,et al.  Having a body versus moving your body: Neural signatures of agency and body-ownership , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  Wendy Ju,et al.  Consistency in physical and on-screen action improves perceptions of telepresence robots , 2012, 2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[9]  Sandra G. Hart,et al.  Nasa-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX); 20 Years Later , 2006 .

[10]  Kenneth Y. Goldberg,et al.  Desktop teleoperation via the World Wide Web , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[11]  Jerry B. Weinberg,et al.  Design of a Lightweight, Ergonomic Manipulator for Enabling Expressive Gesturing in Telepresence Robots , 2018, 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[12]  Béatrice S. Hasler,et al.  1 Self-Presence Standardized : Introducing the Self-Presence Questionnaire ( SPQ ) , 2009 .

[13]  John C. Tang,et al.  Embodied social proxy: mediating interpersonal connection in hub-and-satellite teams , 2010, CHI.

[14]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  MeBot: a robotic platform for socially embodied presence , 2010, HRI.

[15]  Silvia Coradeschi,et al.  A Review of Mobile Robotic Telepresence , 2013, Adv. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[16]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  MeBot: A robotic platform for socially embodied telepresence , 2010, 2010 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[17]  John F. Canny,et al.  Social Tele-Embodiment: Understanding Presence , 2001, Auton. Robots.

[18]  Katherine J. Kuchenbecker,et al.  Effects of Grip-Force, Contact, and Acceleration Feedback on a Teleoperated Pick-and-Place Task , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[19]  Stefan Kopp,et al.  To Err is Human(-like): Effects of Robot Gesture on Perceived Anthropomorphism and Likability , 2013, International Journal of Social Robotics.