Priority setting in the German healthcare system: results from a discrete choice experiment
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] C. Betsch,et al. Public Preferences for Exit Strategies From COVID-19 Lockdown in Germany—A Discrete Choice Experiment , 2021, International Journal of Public Health.
[2] M. Ryan,et al. Understanding public preferences and trade-offs for government responses during a pandemic: a protocol for a discrete choice experiment in the UK , 2020, BMJ Open.
[3] Caterina Di Costanzo. Healthcare Resource Allocation and Priority-setting. A European Challenge. , 2020, European Journal of Health Law.
[4] Michael Wilson,et al. Applying priority-setting frameworks: A review of public and vulnerable populations' participation in health-system priority setting. , 2019, Health policy.
[5] V. Amelung,et al. Public preferences for primary care provision in Germany – a discrete choice experiment , 2019, BMC Family Practice.
[6] P. Hansen,et al. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) in Healthcare Decision-Making , 2019, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Economics and Finance.
[7] M. Trapero-Bertran,et al. Using a stated preference discrete choice experiment to assess societal value from the perspective of decision-makers in Europe. Does it work for rare diseases? , 2019, Health policy.
[8] K. Howard,et al. Measuring trade-offs in nephrology: a systematic review of discrete choice experiments and conjoint analysis studies , 2018, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.
[9] Johannes Heyers. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen einer Ökonomisierung des Sozialrechts am Beispiel der Priorisierung in der Gesetzlichen Krankenversicherung , 2016 .
[10] M. García-Goñi,et al. Comparative analysis of decision maker preferences for equity/efficiency attributes in reimbursement decisions in three European countries , 2016, The European Journal of Health Economics.
[11] O. Norheim. Ethical priority setting for universal health coverage: challenges in deciding upon fair distribution of health services , 2016, BMC Medicine.
[12] O. Norheim,et al. A new proposal for priority setting in Norway: Open and fair. , 2016, Health policy.
[13] A. Culyer,et al. Priority-setting for achieving universal health coverage , 2016, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.
[14] A. Culyer. Efficiency, equity and equality in health and health care , 2015 .
[15] T. Islam,et al. Consumer preferences for electronic cigarettes: results from a discrete choice experiment , 2015, Tobacco Control.
[16] L. Niessen,et al. Equity and efficiency preferences of health policy makers in China--a stated preference analysis. , 2015, Health policy and planning.
[17] C. Mitton,et al. ‘Real-world’ health care priority setting using explicit decision criteria: a systematic review of the literature , 2015, BMC Health Services Research.
[18] P. Goos,et al. Public preferences for prioritizing preventive and curative health care interventions: a discrete choice experiment. , 2015, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.
[19] Robert Koch-Institut. Daten und Fakten: Ergebnisse der Studie "Gesundheit in Deutschland aktuell 2012" , 2014 .
[20] M. Lagarde,et al. The use of discrete choice experiments to inform health workforce policy: a systematic review , 2014, BMC Health Services Research.
[21] F. Paolucci,et al. Priority setting in the Austrian healthcare system: results from a discrete choice experiment and implications for mental health. , 2014, The journal of mental health policy and economics.
[22] T. Vos,et al. Global burden of disease attributable to mental and substance use disorders: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 , 2013, The Lancet.
[23] Paul Kind,et al. WHICH CRITERIA ARE CONSIDERED IN HEALTHCARE DECISIONS? INSIGHTS FROM AN INTERNATIONAL SURVEY OF POLICY AND CLINICAL DECISION MAKERS , 2013, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.
[24] F. Oduncu,et al. Priority-setting, rationing and cost-effectiveness in the German health care system , 2013, Medicine, health care, and philosophy.
[25] Alan D. Lopez,et al. Measuring the global burden of disease. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.
[26] B. Gordijn,et al. International experiences with priority setting in healthcare , 2013, Medicine, health care, and philosophy.
[27] C. Seghieri,et al. Heterogeneity in Preferences for Primary Care Consultations: Results from a Discrete Choice Experiment , 2013 .
[28] F. Oduncu. Verteilungsgerechtigkeit, Rationierung und Priorisierung – das Gesundheitswesen im Spannungsfeld zwischen Medizin, Ökonomie, Ethik und Recht , 2012 .
[29] A. Diederich,et al. Citizen Participation in Patient Prioritization Policy Decisions: An Empirical and Experimental Study on Patients' Characteristics , 2012, PloS one.
[30] R. Baltussen,et al. Decision-making criteria among national policymakers in five countries: a discrete choice experiment eliciting relative preferences for equity and efficiency. , 2012, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.
[31] Andrew Mirelman,et al. Health care priority setting in Norway a multicriteria decision analysis , 2012, BMC Health Services Research.
[32] Mandy Ryan,et al. Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature. , 2012, Health economics.
[33] A. Diederich,et al. Age as a Criterion for Setting Priorities in Health Care? A Survey of the German Public View , 2011, PloS one.
[34] M. Ryan,et al. Using discrete choice experiments to value informal care tasks: exploring preference heterogeneity. , 2011, Health economics.
[35] P. Scuffham,et al. Public and decision maker stated preferences for pharmaceutical subsidy decisions , 2011, Applied health economics and health policy.
[36] C. Mitton,et al. Priority setting in healthcare: towards guidelines for the program budgeting and marginal analysis framework , 2010, Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research.
[37] R. Baltussen,et al. Multi-criteria decision analysis to prioritize health interventions: Capitalizing on first experiences. , 2010, Health policy.
[38] Carin A Uyl-de Groot,et al. Incorporating equity-efficiency interactions in cost-effectiveness analysis-three approaches applied to breast cancer control. , 2010, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.
[39] C. Fuchs,et al. Demografischer Wandel und Notwendigkeit der Priorisierung im Gesundheitswesen , 2010, Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz.
[40] M. Koopmanschap,et al. Dear policy maker: Have you made up your mind? A discrete choice experiment among policy makers and other health professionals , 2010, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.
[41] Karen Gerard,et al. Exploring the social value of health-care interventions: a stated preference discrete choice experiment. , 2009, Health economics.
[42] N. Kenny,et al. An Ethical Analysis of International Health Priority-Setting , 2008, Health Care Analysis.
[43] L. Sabik,et al. Priority setting in health care: Lessons from the experiences of eight countries , 2008 .
[44] Becky Skidmore,et al. Priority setting for health technology assessments: A systematic review of current practical approaches , 2007, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.
[45] A. Hole. Fitting Mixed Logit Models by Using Maximum Simulated Likelihood , 2007 .
[46] C. Jenkins,et al. Patient preferences for managing asthma: results from a discrete choice experiment. , 2007, Health economics.
[47] R. Baltussen,et al. Priority setting using multiple criteria: should a lung health programme be implemented in Nepal? , 2007, Health policy and planning.
[48] Emily Lancsar,et al. Several methods to investigate relative attribute impact in stated preference experiments. , 2007, Social science & medicine.
[49] Douglas K. Martin,et al. A Strategy to Improve Priority Setting in Developing Countries , 2007, Health Care Analysis.
[50] Anthony J Culyer,et al. The bogus conflict between efficiency and vertical equity. , 2006, Health economics.
[51] Elly Stolk,et al. Towards a multi-criteria approach for priority setting: an application to Ghana. , 2006, Health economics.
[52] Stuart Peacock,et al. Using economics to set pragmatic and ethical priorities , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[53] J. Bucksch,et al. Schwerpunktbericht: Gesundheit von Frauen und Männern im mittleren Lebensalter , 2006 .
[54] G. Carrin,et al. Clarifying Efficiency-Equity Tradeoffs Through Explicit Criteria, With a Focus on Developing Countries , 2005, Health Care Analysis.
[55] A. Scott,et al. Preferences for general practice jobs: a survey of principals and sessional GPs. , 2004, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.
[56] David A. Hensher,et al. The Mixed Logit Model: the State of Practice and Warnings for the Unwary , 2001 .
[57] D. Sauerland. The German strategy for quality improvement in health care: still to improve. , 2001, Health policy.
[58] L. Fleck. Healthcare Justice and Rational Democratic Deliberation , 2001, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.
[59] E. Emanuel. Justice and managed care. Four principles for the just allocation of health care resources. , 2000, The Hastings Center report.
[60] K. Train,et al. Mixed Logit with Repeated Choices: Households' Choices of Appliance Efficiency Level , 1998, Review of Economics and Statistics.
[61] J. Barendregt,et al. Global burden of disease , 1997, The Lancet.
[62] W. Groot,et al. Preferences of Bulgarian consumers for quality, access and price attributes of healthcare services—result of a discrete choice experiment , 2017, The International journal of health planning and management.
[63] Maarten J. IJzerman,et al. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Health Care Decision Making--An Introduction: Report 1 of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force. , 2016, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.
[64] Bjoern Schmitz-Luhn,et al. The Law Behind Priorities: Implementation of Priority Setting in Health Care – The German Example , 2016 .
[65] B. Petri. Rationalisierung, Mittelerhöhung, Rationierung und Priorisierung von Gesundheitsleistungen in der Sozialversicherung mit ethischen Aspekten , 2015 .
[66] Reinhard Busse,et al. Germany: Health system review. , 2014, Health systems in transition.
[67] A. Diederich,et al. Mental and physical health: Citizens' preferences on priority-setting in healthcare , 2013 .
[68] J. Louviere,et al. Conducting Discrete Choice Experiments to Inform Healthcare Decision Making , 2012, PharmacoEconomics.
[69] C. Borck. [What kind of debate on prioritisation do we need for the benefit of our health system and society?]. , 2012, Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen.
[70] A. Diederich. Einstellungen zu Priorisierungen in der medizinischen Versorgung , 2011 .
[71] A. Alwan. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2010. , 2011 .
[72] P. Storz,et al. Die Debatte über Priorisierung und Rationierung in der Gesetzlichen Krankenversicherung: überfällig oder überflüssig? , 2010 .
[73] D. Groß,et al. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen von Rationierung und Priorisierung im Gesundheitswesen , 2010 .
[74] G. Marckmann. Priorisierung im Gesundheitswesen: Was können wir aus den internationalen Erfahrungen lernen? , 2009 .
[75] G. Marckmann. [Prioritisation in health care: learning from international experiences]. , 2009, Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen.
[76] Mandy Ryan,et al. Using discrete choice experiments to value health and health care , 2008 .
[77] D. Gyrd-Hansen,et al. Preference heterogeneity and choice of cardiac rehabilitation program: results from a discrete choice experiment. , 2008, Health policy.
[78] R. Baltussen,et al. Priority setting of health interventions: the need for multi-criteria decision analysis , 2006, Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E.
[79] Giles R. Scuderi,et al. The Basic Principles , 2006 .
[80] Glyn Elwyn,et al. Involving patients in primary care consultations: assessing preferences using discrete choice experiments. , 2006, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.
[81] Mandy Ryan,et al. Using discrete choice experiments to value health care programmes: current practice and future research reflections. , 2003, Applied health economics and health policy.
[82] Not Available Not Available. Zentrale Kommission zur Wahrung ethischer Grundsätze in der Medizin und ihren Grenzgebieten (Zentrale Ethikkommission) , 2000, Ethik in der Medizin.
[83] Craig Mitton,et al. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation Open Access Health Care Priority Setting: Principles, Practice and Challenges , 2022 .