Memory Transmission in Small Groups and Large Networks

The spread of social influence in large social networks has long been an interest of social scientists. In the domain of memory, collaborative memory experiments have illuminated cognitive mechanisms that allow information to be transmitted between interacting individuals, but these experiments have focused on small-scale social contexts. In the current study, we took a computational approach, circumventing the practical constraints of laboratory paradigms and providing novel results at scales unreachable by laboratory methodologies. Our model embodied theoretical knowledge derived from small-group experiments and replicated foundational results regarding collaborative inhibition and memory convergence in small groups. Ultimately, we investigated large-scale, realistic social networks and found that agents are influenced by the agents with which they interact, but we also found that agents are influenced by nonneighbors (i.e., the neighbors of their neighbors). The similarity between these results and the reports of behavioral transmission in large networks offers a major theoretical insight by linking behavioral transmission to the spread of information.

[1]  F. Bartlett,et al.  Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology , 1932 .

[2]  Sharon L. Milgram,et al.  The Small World Problem , 1967 .

[3]  W. Zachary,et al.  An Information Flow Model for Conflict and Fission in Small Groups , 1977, Journal of Anthropological Research.

[4]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Threshold Models of Collective Behavior , 1978, American Journal of Sociology.

[5]  T. Schelling.  Micromotives and Macrobehavior , 1978 .

[6]  K. Williams,et al.  Many Hands Make Light the Work: The Causes and Consequences of Social Loafing , 1979 .

[7]  J. H. Steiger.  Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. , 1980 .

[8]  M. Oakes.  Statistical Inference: A Commentary for the Social and Behavioural Sciences , 1986 .

[9]  R. R. Macdonald.  On statistical testing in psychology , 1997 .

[10]  Mary Susan Weldon,et al.  Collective memory: collaborative and individual processes in remembering. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  B. Basden,et al.  A comparison of group and individual remembering: does collaboration disrupt retrieval strategies? , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[13]  M. Weldon,et al.  Group remembering: does social loafing underlie collaborative inhibition? , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  B. Basden,et al.  Costs and benefits of collaborative remembering , 2000 .

[15]  R. Sun.  Cognitive science meets multi-agent systems: A prolegomenon , 2001 .

[16]  Rainer Hegselmann,et al.  Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: models, analysis and simulation , 2002, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[17]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Linked - how everything is connected to everything else and what it means for business, science, and everyday life , 2003 .

[18]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Six Degrees: The Science of a Connected Age , 2003 .

[19]  D. Watts,et al.  An Experimental Study of Search in Global Social Networks , 2003, Science.

[20]  D. Meadows-Klue.  The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference , 2004 .

[21]  Dale J. Barr,et al.  Establishing conventional communication systems: Is common knowledge necessary? , 2004, Cogn. Sci..

[22]  R. Sun.  Cognition and Multi-Agent Interactions: From Cognitive Modeling to Social Simulation , 2005 .

[23]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Computational models of collective behavior , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  M. Newman,et al.  Finding community structure in networks using the eigenvectors of matrices. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[25]  Christian Lebiere,et al.  Cognition and Multi-Agent Interaction: From Cognitive Modeling to Social Simulation , 2006 .

[26]  Craig Thorley,et al.  Collaborative false recall in the DRM procedure: Effects of group size and group pressure , 2007 .

[27]  Kathleen C. Schwartzman,et al.  DIFFUSION IN ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIAL MOVEMENTS: From Hybrid Corn to Poison Pills , 2007 .

[28]  Suparna Rajaram,et al.  Influence of re-exposure and retrieval disruption during group collaboration on later individual recall , 2008, Memory.

[29]  J. Wertsch,et al.  Collective memory: Conceptual foundations and theoretical approaches , 2008, Memory.

[30]  William Hirst,et al.  Towards a psychology of collective memory , 2008, Memory.

[31]  D. Watts,et al.  Social Influence, Binary Decisions and Collective Dynamics , 2008 .

[32]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Contextualizing person perception: distributed social cognition. , 2009, Psychological review.

[33]  William Hirst,et al.  Forgetting the Unforgettable Through Conversation , 2009, Psychological science.

[34]  Suparna Rajaram,et al.  Effects of repeated collaborative retrieval on individual memory vary as a function of recall versus recognition tasks , 2009, Memory.

[35]  Damon Centola,et al.  The Spread of Behavior in an Online Social Network Experiment , 2010, Science.

[36]  S. Rajaram,et al.  Collaborative Memory: Cognitive Research and Theory , 2010, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[37]  John Sutton,et al.  Building consensus about the past: Schema consistency and convergence in socially shared retrieval-induced forgetting , 2010, Memory.

[38]  Simon Garrod,et al.  The Interactive Evolution of Human Communication Systems , 2010, Cogn. Sci..

[39]  Suparna Rajaram,et al.  The influence of learning methods on collaboration: prior repeated retrieval enhances retrieval organization, abolishes collaborative inhibition, and promotes post-collaborative memory. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[40]  Damon Centola.  Damon Centola Behavior An Experimental Study of Homophily in the Adoption of Health , 2011 .

[41]  Susan K. Walker.  Connected: The Surprising Power of Our Social Networks and How They Shape Our Lives , 2011 .

[42]  Damon Centola.  An Experimental Study of Homophily in the Adoption of Health Behavior , 2011, Science.

[43]  Suparna Rajaram,et al.  Collaboration Both Hurts and Helps Memory , 2011 .

[44]  Michael Lewis,et al.  Mnemonic Convergence: From Empirical Data to Large-Scale Dynamics , 2012, SBP.

[45]  Chris Arney,et al.  Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning about a Highly Connected World (Easley, D. and Kleinberg, J.; 2010) [Book Review] , 2013, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.

[46]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Social Learning Strategies in Networked Groups , 2013, Cogn. Sci..

[47]  Suparna Rajaram,et al.  Collaboration changes both the content and the structure of memory: Building the architecture of shared representations. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[48]  S. Rajaram,et al.  The role of group configuration in the social transmission of memory: Evidence from identical and reconfigured groups , 2014 .

[49]  W. Hirst,et al.  Mnemonic convergence in a social network: Collective memory and extended influence , 2014 .