A mixed (continuous + discrete) time-cost trade-off model considering four different relationships with lag time

Numerous Time-Cost Trade-Off (TCTO) models have been developed to identify the best combination of time and cost in a critical path network. Although there are four relationships in the critical path network, most of the models developed so far have considered only the Finish-Start (F-S) relationship. Thus, an advanced TCTO model that considers all four relationships between activities was developed in this study to accurately present a project, and is presented in this paper. The model also takes into account the lag time between activities. Previous TCTO models minimize the total project cost based on the given crash scenario. Moreover, to enhance the practicality, the model was developed to work with various TCTO scenarios such as continuous, discrete, and even mixed (continuous + discrete). The combined scenario reflects the most realistic situation. Two independent scenarios cannot be combined without mathematical modifications since a rudimentary mixing of two scenarios may provide an incorrect solution. A new formulation technique is introduced to merge the two independent scenarios mathematically and it guarantees the optimal solution.

[1]  Mohan M. Kumaraswamy,et al.  Applying a Genetic Algorithm-Based Multiobjective Approach for Time-Cost Optimization , 2004 .

[2]  Tariq Haroon Ahmad,et al.  Project management with CPM , 1976 .

[3]  A. Samer Ezeldin,et al.  Hybrid Time-Cost Optimization of Nonserial Repetitive Construction Projects , 2009 .

[4]  Erik Demeulemeester,et al.  New computational results on the discrete time/cost trade-off problem in project networks , 1998, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[5]  Diane Reyniers Operations Research: An Introduction (4th Edition) , 1989 .

[6]  Barrie M. Baker Cost/time trade-off analysis for the critical path method: a derivation of the network flow approach , 1997 .

[7]  Chuntian Cheng,et al.  Combining a fuzzy optimal model with a genetic algorithm to solve multi-objective rainfall–runoff model calibration , 2002 .

[8]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Using improved genetic algorithms to facilitate time-cost optimization , 1997 .

[9]  Sou-Sen Leu,et al.  A GA-based fuzzy optimal model for construction time-cost trade-off , 2001 .

[10]  Chung-Wei Feng,et al.  Stochastic construction time-cost trade-off analysis , 2000 .

[11]  Po-Han Chen,et al.  A two-phase GA model for resource-constrained project scheduling , 2009 .

[12]  Chung-Wei Feng,et al.  Construction Time-Cost Trade-Off Analysis Using LP/IP Hybrid Method , 1995 .

[13]  I-Tung Yang,et al.  Using elitist particle swarm optimization to facilitate bicriterion time-cost trade-off analysis , 2007 .

[14]  Cengiz Haksever,et al.  Flexible Model for Time'Cost Tradeoff Problem , 2004 .

[15]  James D. Stevens Techniques for Construction Network Scheduling , 1989 .

[16]  Gang Li,et al.  Multiple criteria data envelopment analysis for full ranking units associated to environment impact assessment , 2006 .

[17]  Hojjat Adeli,et al.  Scheduling/Cost Optimization and Neural Dynamics Model for Construction , 1997 .

[18]  Bryan Christopher Que INCORPORATING PRACTICABILITY INTO GENETIC ALGORITHM-BASED TIME-COST OPTIMIZATION , 2002 .

[19]  Jian-Ping Zhang,et al.  4D Dynamic Management for Construction Planning and Resource Utilization , 2004 .

[20]  Heng Li,et al.  Using machine learning and GA to solve time-cost trade-off problems , 1999 .

[21]  Tarek Hegazy Optimization of construction time-cost trade-off analysis using genetic algorithms , 1999 .

[22]  Sou-Sen Leu,et al.  GA-BASED MULTICRITERIA OPTIMAL MODEL FOR CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULING , 1999 .

[23]  Abbas Afshar,et al.  Fuzzy-based MOGA approach to stochastic time-cost trade-off problem , 2009 .

[24]  Chung-Wei Feng,et al.  Using genetic algorithms to solve construction time-cost trade-off problems , 1997 .

[25]  E. W. Davis,et al.  Project Management With Cpm, Pert and Precedence Diagramming , 1983 .