Methodologies and tools for proton beam design for lung tumors.

PURPOSE Proton beams can potentially increase the dose delivered to lung tumors without increasing the dose to critical normal tissues because protons can be stopped before encountering the normal tissues. This potential can only be realized if tissue motion and planning uncertainties are correctly included during planning. This study evaluated several planning strategies to determine which method best provides adequate tumor coverage, minimal normal tissue irradiation, and simplicity of use. METHODS AND MATERIALS Proton beam treatment plans were generated using one or more of three different planning strategies. These strategies included designing apertures and boluses to the PTV, apertures to the PTV and boluses to the CTV, and aperture and bolus to the CTV. RESULTS The planning target volume as specified in ICRU Report 50 can be used only to design the lateral margins of beams, because the distal and proximal margins resulting from CT number uncertainty, beam range uncertainty, tissue motions, and setup uncertainties, are different than the lateral margins resulting from these same factors. The best strategy for target coverage with the planning tools available overirradiated some normal tissues unnecessarily. The available tools also made the planning of lung tumors difficult. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated that inclusion of target motion and setup uncertainties into a plan should be performed in the beam design step instead of creating new targets. New computerized treatment planning system tools suggested by this study will ease planning, facilitate abandonment of the PTV concept, improve conformance of the dose distribution to the target, and improve conformal avoidance of critical normal tissues.

[1]  M. Goitein,et al.  Tolerance of normal tissue to therapeutic irradiation. , 1991, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  David A. Jaffray,et al.  60 The use of active breathing control (ABC) to minimize breathing motion during radiation therapy , 1997 .

[3]  M Goitein,et al.  Calculation of the uncertainty in the dose delivered during radiation therapy. , 1985, Medical physics.

[4]  J. Slater,et al.  Pulmonary injury from proton and conventional radiotherapy as revealed by CT. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  G T Chen,et al.  Implications of 3-dimensional target shape and motion in aperture design. , 1996, Medical physics.

[6]  M Goitein,et al.  Compensating for heterogeneities in proton radiation therapy. , 1984, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  M Goitein,et al.  Limitations of two-dimensional treatment planning programs. , 1982, Medical physics.

[8]  J M Slater,et al.  Proton-beam radiotherapy for early-stage lung cancer. , 1999, Chest.

[9]  R Mohan,et al.  The role of uncertainty analysis in treatment planning. , 1991, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  M. Goitein Compensation for inhomogeneities in charged particle radiotherapy using computed tomography. , 1978, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.