Quantitative risk analysis of fire and explosion on the top-side LNG-liquefaction process of LNG-FPSO

Abstract Since the massive use and production of fuel oil and natural gas, the excavating locations of buried energy-carrying material are moving further away from onshore, eventually requiring floating production systems like floating production, storage and offloading (FPSO). Among those platforms, LNG-FPSO will play a leading role to satisfy the global demands for the natural gas in near future; the LNG-FPSO system is designed to deal with all the LNG processing activities, near the gas field. However, even a single disaster on an offshore plant would put the whole business into danger. In this research, the risk of fire and explosion in the LNG-FPSO is assessed by quantitative risk analysis, including frequency and consequence analyses, focusing on the LNG liquefaction process (DMR cycle). The consequence analysis is modeled by using a popular analysis tool PHAST. To assess the risk of this system, 5 release model scenarios are set for the LNG and refrigerant leakages from valves, selected as the most probable scenarios causing fire and explosion. From the results, it is found that the introduction of additional protection methods to reduce the effect of fire and explosion under ALARP criteria is not required, and two cases of the selection of independent protection layers are recommended to meet the SIL level of failure rate for safer design and operation in the offshore environment.

[1]  Scott Huler,et al.  Defining the Wind: The Beaufort Scale, and How a 19th-Century Admiral Turned Science into Poetry , 2004 .

[2]  Pedro Antão,et al.  Analysing the risk of LNG carrier operations , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[3]  Audun Brandsæter.  Risk assessment in the offshore industry , 2002 .

[4]  G. Venkatarathnam.  Cryogenic mixed refrigerant processes , 2008 .

[5]  Jean-Marie Buchlin,et al.  Thermal shielding by water spray curtain , 2005 .

[6]  Jan Erik Vinnem,et al.  Offshore Risk Assessment: Principles, Modelling and Applications of QRA Studies , 1999 .

[7]  Heechang Kim,et al.  Application of an Integrated FEED Process Engineering Solution to Generic LNG FPSO Topsides , 2009 .

[8]  Dongil Shin,et al.  Explosion Simulations for the Quantitative Risk Analysis of New Energy Filling Stations , 2011 .

[9]  Dongil Shin,et al.  Risk Index Approach for the Optimal Layout of Chemical Processes Minimizing Risk to Humans , 2013 .

[10]  Josep Arnaldos,et al.  A model for estimating the impact of the domino effect on accident frequencies in quantitative risk assessments of storage facilities , 2013 .

[11]  Ju-Hwan Cha,et al.  Determination of the Optimal Operating Condition of Dual Mixed Refrigerant Cycle of LNG FPSO Topside Liquefaction Process , 2012 .

[12]  En Sup Yoon,et al.  Safety Assessment of LNG Terminal Focused on the Consequence Analysis of LNG Spills , 2009 .

[13]  Brian Veitch,et al.  Revised fire consequence models for offshore quantitative risk assessment , 2005 .

[14]  W. G. Gulland.  Methods of Determining Safety Integrity Level (SIL) Requirements - Pros and Cons , 2004 .

[15]  Dongil Shin,et al.  Analysis of Gas Explosion Consequence Models for the Explosion Risk Control in the New Gas Energy Filling Stations , 2013 .

[16]  Bum-Su Kim,et al.  A Study on Quantitative Risk Presentation of LNG Station , 2009 .

[17]  Kyu-Yeul Lee,et al.  Determination of the optimal operating conditions of the dual mixed refrigerant cycle for the LNG FPSO topside liquefaction process , 2013, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[18]  M. Sam Mannan,et al.  Fire and explosion assessment on oil and gas floating production storage offloading (FPSO): An effective screening and comparison tool , 2009 .

[19]  Jean-Marc Thiriet,et al.  Integration of intelligent sensors in Safety Instrumented Systems (SIS) , 2014 .

[20]  Arthur M. Dowell.  Layer of protection analysis for determining safety integrity level , 1998 .