Substance use disorder diagnostic schedule (SUDDS): the equivalence and validity of a computer-administered and an interviewer-administered format.

In order to evaluate the equivalence of interviewer-administered and computer-administered forms of the substance use disorder diagnostic schedule (SUDDS), both forms were presented to 100 substance-dependent inpatients. An additional 101 psychiatric outpatients were administered one form or the other. For patients who received both forms of the SUDDS, the percentage agreement ranged from 96% for the classification of a lifetime diagnosis of alcohol abuse/dependence to 88% for the classification of current diagnosis of alcohol abuse/dependence (kappa coefficients ranged from 0.709 to 0.865). Overall agreement with a clinician diagnosis (validity) and the two forms of administration varied from 100% for computer-generated diagnosis of current alcohol abuse/dependence to 71% for computer-generated lifetime diagnosis of drug abuse/dependence, when stratified by number of symptoms reported. No consistent differences were found in the performances of the two forms of the SUDDS, and we conclude that they may be used interchangeably.

[1]  P. O'Brien,et al.  Discriminant analysis of the Self-Administered Alcoholism Screening Test. , 1987, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[2]  J. Feighner,et al.  Diagnostic criteria for use in psychiatric research. , 1972, Archives of general psychiatry.

[3]  D. Mayfield,et al.  The CAGE questionnaire: validation of a new alcoholism screening instrument. , 1974, The American journal of psychiatry.

[4]  H A Skinner,et al.  Does the computer make a difference? Computerized versus face-to-face versus self-report assessment of alcohol, drug, and tobacco use. , 1983, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[5]  R. W. Lucas,et al.  Psychiatrists and a Computer as Interrogators of Patients with Alcohol-Related Illnesses: A Comparison , 1977, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[6]  J. Ewing,et al.  Detecting alcoholism. The CAGE questionnaire. , 1984, JAMA.

[7]  S. Finklestein,et al.  The predictive power of diagnostic tests and the effect of prevalence of illness. , 1983, Archives of general psychiatry.

[8]  E. Spitznagel,et al.  A proposed solution to the base rate problem in the kappa statistic. , 1985, Archives of general psychiatry.

[9]  E. Robins,et al.  Research diagnostic criteria: rationale and reliability. , 1978, Archives of general psychiatry.

[10]  M. Selzer The Michigan alcoholism screening test: the quest for a new diagnostic instrument. , 1971, The American journal of psychiatry.

[11]  L. J. Davis,et al.  Self-Administered Alcoholism Screening Test: a comparison of conventional versus computer-administered formats. , 1991, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[12]  Swenson Wm,et al.  The use of a self-administered alcoholism screening test (SAAST) in a medical center. , 1975 .