Complex assessment model for advanced technology deployment

AbstractThe construction sector constantly offers new products, more effective technologies and novel solutions aimed at improvement of the quality of human habitats and wider distribution of technologies. Currently, effective technologies that require less time and costs for production, installation and use are gaining greater significance. Among them are construction materials and technologies with increasingly popular sustainability features. Considering the above, the article offers a complex algorithm for assessing the deployment and distribution potential of a new technology/product. For this purpose, a multi-stage model of alternatives and criteria was suggested and an analytical multi-stage evaluation model has been designed. The practical example illustrates the assessment of micro environment using a combination of AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) and Permutation methods. The designed multi-criteria assessment model promotes accessibility of users to a technology, new product, a part of the prod...

[1]  Karen High,et al.  SUSTAINABILITY EVALUATOR: Tool for evaluating process sustainability , 2013 .

[2]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  The Multi-stage Decision Making System for Complicated Problems , 2013 .

[3]  Selma Regina Martins Oliveira,et al.  Model for Technological Innovation Integration and New Product Development in High Tech Environments , 2013 .

[4]  Jolanta Tamošaitienė,et al.  COMPLEX ASSESSMENT OF STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS USED FOR HIGH-RISE BUILDINGS , 2013 .

[5]  Jolanta Tamošaitienė,et al.  Complex model for the assessment of the location of high-rise buildings in the city urban structure , 2013 .

[6]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  The construction sector in twenty European countries during the recession 2008–2009 – country ranking by MULTIMOORA , 2013 .

[7]  Ezekiel Chinyio,et al.  Multi-criteria evaluation model for the selection of sustainable materials for building projects , 2013 .

[8]  Mladen Radujković,et al.  Risk register developement and implementation for construction projects , 2013 .

[9]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Technology development in construction: a continuum from distant past into the future , 2013 .

[10]  Malena Ingemansson,et al.  Industrial renewal within the construction network , 2013 .

[11]  B. Mujtaba,et al.  A Study of Bribery and Wealth in the ASEAN Community Based on Corruption Perception Index Scores and GNP per Capital , 2013 .

[12]  Razli Che Razak,et al.  Technological innovation implementation: A proposed model on organizational learning capability with moderating effect of knowledge complexity , 2013 .

[13]  Simona Kildiene,et al.  Assessment of Opportunities for Construction Enterprises in European Union Member States Using the MULTIMOORA Method , 2013 .

[14]  Henrikas Sivilevičius,et al.  Expert evaluation of criteria describing the quality of travelling by international passenger train: technological, economic and safety perspectives , 2012 .

[15]  Arturas Kaklauskas,et al.  Passive House Model for Quantitative and Qualitative Analyses and Its Intelligent System , 2012 .

[16]  Pamela J. Zelbst,et al.  Green supply chain management practices: impact on performance , 2012 .

[17]  C. Herstatt,et al.  Green Innovation in Technology and Innovation Management – An Exploratory Literature Review , 2012 .

[18]  Bong Gyou Lee,et al.  The effect of R&D, technology commercialization capabilities and innovation performance , 2012 .

[19]  A. Mazurkiewicz,et al.  System of a complex assessment of technological innovative solutions , 2012 .

[20]  Francesco Testa,et al.  The effect of environmental regulation on firms' competitive performance: the case of the building & construction sector in some EU regions. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.

[21]  Ismi Rajiani,et al.  Green Technology Readiness In Malaysia: Sustainability For Business Development , 2011 .

[22]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Selection of construction enterprises management strategy based on the SWOT and multi-criteria analysis , 2011 .

[23]  Ghassan Aouad,et al.  Facilitating innovation in construction , 2010 .

[24]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Integrated knowledge management model and system for construction projects , 2010, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[25]  D. Teece.  Business Models, Business Strategy and Innovation , 2010 .

[26]  Karen Manley,et al.  Against the odds: Small firms in Australia successfully introducing new technology on construction projects , 2008 .

[27]  Zenonas Turskis,et al.  Multi‐attribute contractors ranking method by applying ordering of feasible alternatives of solutions in terms of preferability technique , 2008 .

[28]  Geoffrey A. Moore.  Crossing the chasm : marketing and selling high-tech products to mainstream customers , 1999 .

[29]  Edward M. Shepard,et al.  The Diffusion of Innovation in Home Building , 1996 .

[30]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications , 1992, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[31]  Jean H. P. Paelinck,et al.  Qualitative multiple criteria analysis, environmental protection and multiregional development , 1976 .

[32]  E. von Hippel,et al.  Sources of Innovation , 2016 .