Environmental distribution of colony growth form in the favositid Pleurodictyum americanum

Pandolfi, John M. & Burke, Collette D. 1989 01 15: Environmental distribution of colony growth form in the favositid Pleurodictyum americanum. Lethaia, Vol. 22, pp. 69–84. Oslo. ISSN 0024–1164. Colony growth form is of fundamental importance to understanding the ecology of both modern and ancient marine sessile colonial animals. Fourier shape analysis of the coral Pleurodictyun americantum (Tabulata: Favositida) from the Middle Devonian Hamilton Group of New York State, indicates that colony growth form is variable between environments. Discriminate function analysis of harmonics 2–6 of 51 assemblages of Pleurodictyum americanum (N = 1900) shows that this species displays an onshore to offshore gradient in colony shape. Offshore environments characterized by low levels of turbidity, oxygen, and light contain more flattened, less hemispherical growth forms, whereas onshore environments characterized by high levels of turbidity, oxygen, and light contain more hemispherical, less flattened growth forms. Harmonic shape analysis detected subtle differences among samples of P. americanum from different environments, but also showed that distinctive morphotypes are distributed within horizons. as well as between them. In fact, no one-to-one correspondence in growth form to environment is apparent; growth forms are distributed within environments, suggesting that genetic factors may have had a greater influence over coral growth form than environment. In tabulate corals, patterns of within species variability must be determined before growth form may be useful in interpreting ancient environments. □Tabulate coral, Fourier shape analysis, morphological variability, growth form, Devonian, Hamilton Group, New York.

[1]  J. Pandolfi,et al.  Shape analysis of two sympatric coral species: Implications for taxonomy and evolution , 1989 .

[2]  C. D. Burke,et al.  Recognition of fossil fresh water ostracodes: Fourier shape analysis , 1987 .

[3]  D. R. Hickey Shell shape plasticity in Late Pennsylvanian myalinids (Bivalvia) , 1987, Journal of Paleontology.

[4]  F. James Rohlf,et al.  Relationships among eigenshape analysis, Fourier analysis, and analysis of coordinates , 1986 .

[5]  Robert Ehrlich,et al.  Comments on “relationships among eigenshape analysis, fourier analysis, and analysis of coordinates” by F. James Rohlf , 1986 .

[6]  W. Full,et al.  Fundamental problems associated with “eigenshape analysis” and similar “factor” analysis procedures , 1986 .

[7]  Roger L. Kaesler,et al.  Ontogeny and heterochrony in the ostracode Cavellina Coryell from Lower Permian rocks in Kansas , 1986, Paleobiology.

[8]  Dwight W. Read,et al.  Comment on Uses of Homologous-point Measures in Systematics: a Reply to Bookstein Et Al. , 1986 .

[9]  Robert Ehrlich,et al.  Morphometric and stable isotopic evidence for subpopulations of Globorotalia truncatulinoides , 1985 .

[10]  F. Rohlf,et al.  A COMPARISON OF FOURIER METHODS FOR THE DESCRIPTION OF WING SHAPE IN MOSQUITOES (DIPTERA: CULICIDAE) , 1984 .

[11]  D. Potts NATURAL SELECTION IN EXPERIMENTAL POPULATIONS OF REEF‐BUILDING CORALS (SCLERACTINIA) , 1984, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[12]  G. P. Lohmann Eigenshape analysis of microfossils: A general morphometric procedure for describing changes in shape , 1983 .

[13]  C. Brett,et al.  Regional variation and paleontology of two coral beds in the Middle Devonian Hamilton Group of western New York , 1983 .

[14]  C. Brett,et al.  Substrate specificity in the Devonian tabulate coral Pleurodictyum , 1982 .

[15]  C. Stearn The shapes of Paleozoic and modern reef-builders: a critical review , 1982, Paleobiology.

[16]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  The Truss: Body Form Reconstructions in Morphometrics , 1982 .

[17]  A. Siegel,et al.  A robust comparison of biological shapes. , 1982, Biometrics.

[18]  Charles R. Giardina,et al.  Elliptic Fourier features of a closed contour , 1982, Comput. Graph. Image Process..

[19]  Robert Ehrlich,et al.  Some approaches for location of centroids of quartz grain outlines to increase homology between Fourier amplitude spectra , 1982 .

[20]  Douglas F. Williams,et al.  Fourier analysis of test shape of planktonic foraminifera , 1981, Nature.

[21]  A. B. Foster ENVIRONMENTAL VARIATION IN A FOSSIL SCLERACTINIAN CORAL , 1979 .

[22]  Ann Budd Foster,et al.  Phenotypic plasticity in the reef corals Montastraea annularis (Ellis & Solander) and Siderastrea siderea (Ellis & Solander) , 1979 .

[23]  R. Furness,et al.  Astogenetic and environmental variation of zooid size within colonies of Jurassic Stomatopora (Bryozoa, Cyclostomata) , 1978 .

[24]  R. Ehrlich,et al.  Fourier Biometrics: Harmonic Amplitudes as Multivariate Shape Descriptors , 1977 .

[25]  J. L. Gevirtz Fourier analysis of bivalve outlines: Implications on evolution and autecology , 1976 .

[26]  P. Dustan,et al.  Growth and form in the reef-building coral Montastrea annularis , 1975 .

[27]  Robert L. Anstey,et al.  Fourier Analysis of Zooecial Shapes in Fossil Tubular Bryozoans , 1973 .

[28]  Roger L. Kaesler,et al.  Fourier Analysis of the Ostracode Margin , 1972 .

[29]  Ralph Roskies,et al.  Fourier Descriptors for Plane Closed Curves , 1972, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[30]  T. Goreau THE PHYSIOLOGY OF SKELETON FORMATION IN CORALS. I. A METHOD FOR MEASURING THE RATE OF CALCIUM DEPOSITION BY CORALS UNDER DIFFERENT CONDITIONS , 1959 .

[31]  C. Wallace,et al.  Scleractinia of eastern Australia. Part V , 1984 .

[32]  J. Veron The species concept in 'Scleractinia of Eastern Australia' , 1982 .

[33]  D. Potts Differentiation in Coral Populations , 1978 .

[34]  M. Wijsman-Best Systematics and ecology of New Caledonian Faviinae (Coelenterata – Scleractinia) , 1972 .

[35]  T. W. Vaughan,et al.  Revision of the Suborders Families, and Genera of the Scleractinia , 1943 .