For all intents and purposes: Twitter as a foundational technology for teachers

Twitter is increasingly accepted as an important educational technology and has been shown to serve a range of purposes. In fact, this variety suggests that Twitter has the potential to serve as a foundational technology: one capable of supporting teachers’ learning across multiple formal and informal contexts. To explore this possibility, we examined the purposes that Twitter serves in one educational technology graduate program. We collected over 9000 tweets containing any of 12 program-related hashtags and coded a sample of them to describe the purposes they served. This resulted in six themes: contribute to disciplinary conversation, engage with disciplinary conversation, build community, make connections with other communities, ask for and provide support, and unclear or irrelevant purpose. These themes—and the varied contexts they were associated with—suggest that Twitter serves as a foundational technology in this program and has the potential to do so in other educational communities.

[1]  Rebecca Eynon,et al.  The Ethics of Internet Research , 2008 .

[2]  Benjamin Gleason,et al.  Twitteracy: Tweeting as a New Literacy Practice , 2012 .

[3]  Johnny Saldaña,et al.  The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers , 2009 .

[4]  Des Laffey,et al.  Is Twitter for the Birds? , 2011 .

[5]  Julie Coiro,et al.  Central issues in new literacies and new literacies research , 2008 .

[6]  Telecommunications Board,et al.  Emerging and Readily Available Technologies and National Security: A Framework for Addressing Ethical, Legal, and Societal Issues , 2014 .

[7]  M. Cole.  Cultural psychology: a once and future discipline? , 1996, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[8]  Lois Ann Scheidt,et al.  It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens , 2015, New Media Soc..

[9]  Matthew J. Koehler,et al.  Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge , 2006, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[10]  F. Al-Shamali,et al.  Author Biographies. , 2015, Journal of social work in disability & rehabilitation.

[11]  Leigh Graves Wolf,et al.  Making It Meaningful : The Reciprocal Relationship Between Technology and Psychology , 2022 .

[12]  Reynol Junco,et al.  The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades , 2011, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[13]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[14]  Michael Molenda,et al.  Historical Foundations , 2021, Hinduism.

[15]  Leigh Graves Wolf,et al.  The Habits of Mind Necessary to Generate New Ways of Teaching in a Career of Constant Change , 2013 .

[16]  H. Borko,et al.  Wicked Problems and Other Thoughts on Issues of Technology and Teacher Learning , 2009 .

[17]  Noeline Wright.  Twittering in teacher education: reflecting on practicum experiences , 2010 .

[18]  Melvin Kranzberg.  Technology and History: "Kranzberg's Laws" , 1986 .

[19]  Brigid Barron.  Interest and Self-Sustained Learning as Catalysts of Development: A Learning Ecology Perspective , 2006, Human Development.

[20]  Braden Allenby,et al.  The Industrial Ecology of Emerging Technologies , 2008 .

[21]  Daniel G. Krutka,et al.  How and Why Educators Use Twitter: A Survey of the Field , 2014 .

[22]  W. Goddard,et al.  Design and study of homogeneous catalysts for the selective, low temperature oxidation of hydrocarbons , 2006 .

[23]  Ryan D. Visser,et al.  #TwitterforTeachers: The Implications of Twitter as a Self-Directed Professional Development Tool for K–12 Teachers , 2014 .

[24]  Rachel Buchanan,et al.  'Follow' Me: Networked Professional Learning for Teachers , 2013 .

[25]  Michael Cole,et al.  Literacy without Schooling: Testing for Intellectual Effects , 1978 .