Computational Approaches to Subjective Interpretation of Multimedia Messages

Nowadays a large part of communication is taking place on social media platforms such as Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, or YouTube, where messages often include multimedia contents (e.g., images, GIFs or videos). Since such messages are in digital form, computers can in principle process them in order to make our lives more convenient and help us overcome arising issues. However, these goals require the ability to capture what these messages mean to us, that is, how we interpret them from our own subjective points of view. Thus, the main goal of this dissertation is to advance a machine's ability to interpret social media contents in a more natural, subjective way. To this end, three research questions are addressed. The first question aims at answering "How to model human interpretation for machine learning?" We describe a way of modeling interpretation which allows for analyzing single or multiple ways of interpretation of both humans and computer models within the same theoretic framework. In a comprehensive survey we collect various possibilities for such a computational analysis. Particularly interesting are machine learning approaches where a single neural network learns multiple ways of interpretation. For example, a neural network can be trained to predict user-specific movie ratings from movie features and user ID, and can then be analyzed to understand how users rate movies. This is a promising direction, as neural networks are capable of learning complex patterns. However, how analysis results depend on network architecture is a largely unexplored topic. For the example of movie ratings, we show that the way of combining information for prediction can affect both prediction performance and what the network learns about the various ways of interpretation (corresponding to users). Since some application-specific details for dealing with human interpretation only become visible when going deeper into particular use-cases, the other two research questions of this dissertation are concerned with two selected application domains: Subjective visual interpretation and gang violence prevention. The first application study deals with subjectivity that comes from personal attitudes and aims at answering "How can we predict subjective image interpretation one would expect from the general public on photo-sharing platforms such as Flickr?" The predictions in this case take the form of subjective concepts or phrases. Our study on gang violence prevention is more community-centered and considers the question "How can we automatically detect tweets of gang members which could potentially lead to violence?" There, the psychosocial codes aggression, loss and substance use serve as proxy to estimate the subjective implications of online messages. In these two distinct application domains, we develop novel machine learning models for predicting subjective interpretations of images or tweets with images, respectively. In the process of building these detection tools, we also create three different datasets which we share with the research community. Furthermore, we see that some domains such as Chicago gangs require special care due to high vulnerability of involved users. This motivated us to establish and describe an in-depth collaboration between social work researchers and computer scientists. As machine learning is incorporating more and more subjective components and gaining societal impact, we have good reason to believe that similar collaborations between the humanities and computer science will become increasingly necessary to advance the field in an ethical way.

[1]  Vadlamani Ravi,et al.  A survey on opinion mining and sentiment analysis: Tasks, approaches and applications , 2015, Knowl. Based Syst..

[2]  Ali Farhadi,et al.  Describing objects by their attributes , 2009, 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[3]  David A. Shamma,et al.  YFCC100M , 2015, Commun. ACM.

[4]  J. Schmidhuber,et al.  The Sacred Infrastructure for Computational Research , 2017, SciPy.

[5]  Anton van den Hengel,et al.  Tips and Tricks for Visual Question Answering: Learnings from the 2017 Challenge , 2017, 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[6]  J. Gibbs,et al.  A Meta-Analysis on Cognitive Distortions and Externalizing Problem Behavior , 2015 .

[7]  Kiyoaki Shirai,et al.  PhraseRNN: Phrase Recursive Neural Network for Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis , 2015, EMNLP.

[8]  Nuria Oliver,et al.  Towards Computational Models of the Visual Aesthetic Appeal of Consumer Videos , 2010, ECCV.

[9]  Quoc V. Le,et al.  Grounded Compositional Semantics for Finding and Describing Images with Sentences , 2014, TACL.

[10]  Wojciech Samek,et al.  Methods for interpreting and understanding deep neural networks , 2017, Digit. Signal Process..

[11]  Byron C. Wallace,et al.  Modelling Context with User Embeddings for Sarcasm Detection in Social Media , 2016, CoNLL.

[12]  André Brock,et al.  Critical technocultural discourse analysis , 2018, New Media Soc..

[13]  David Bamman,et al.  Distributed Representations of Geographically Situated Language , 2014, ACL.

[14]  Alberto Del Bimbo,et al.  Image Popularity Prediction in Social Media Using Sentiment and Context Features , 2015, ACM Multimedia.

[15]  A. Zwinderman,et al.  Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology Quantifying the Association between Gene Expressions and DNA-Markers by Penalized Canonical Correlation Analysis , 2011 .

[16]  Erik Cambria,et al.  Sentic LDA: Improving on LDA with semantic similarity for aspect-based sentiment analysis , 2016, 2016 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN).

[17]  Alexander Binder,et al.  Explaining nonlinear classification decisions with deep Taylor decomposition , 2015, Pattern Recognit..

[18]  Owen Rambow,et al.  Using Natural Language Processing and Qualitative Analysis to Intervene in Gang Violence: A Collaboration Between Social Work Researchers and Data Scientists , 2016, ArXiv.

[19]  Georgiana Dinu,et al.  From Visual Attributes to Adjectives through Decompositional Distributional Semantics , 2015, Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics.

[20]  David Carmel,et al.  Social media recommendation based on people and tags , 2010, SIGIR.

[21]  Immanuel Bayer fastFM: A Library for Factorization Machines , 2016, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[22]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[23]  Shih-Fu Chang,et al.  More Cat than Cute?: Interpretable Prediction of Adjective-Noun Pairs , 2017, MUSA2@MM.

[24]  Luca Bertinetto,et al.  Learning feed-forward one-shot learners , 2016, NIPS.

[25]  R. Zajonc Feeling and thinking : Preferences need no inferences , 1980 .

[26]  Yue Gao,et al.  Predicting Personalized Emotion Perceptions of Social Images , 2016, ACM Multimedia.

[27]  Adiwijaya,et al.  Aspect-based sentiment analysis to review products using Naïve Bayes , 2017 .

[28]  Sergio Guadarrama,et al.  Speed/Accuracy Trade-Offs for Modern Convolutional Object Detectors , 2016, 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[29]  Takao Kobayashi,et al.  Speaking style adaptation using context clustering decision tree for HMM-based speech synthesis , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[30]  A. L. Edwards The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research , 1958 .

[31]  Bernardete Ribeiro,et al.  Learning from multiple annotators: Distinguishing good from random labelers , 2013, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[32]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning representations by back-propagating errors , 1986, Nature.

[33]  Milos Jenicek,et al.  List of Cognitive Biases , 2010 .

[34]  Rongrong Ji,et al.  SentiBank: large-scale ontology and classifiers for detecting sentiment and emotions in visual content , 2013, ACM Multimedia.

[35]  Lexing Xie,et al.  SentiCap: Generating Image Descriptions with Sentiments , 2015, AAAI.

[36]  P. Stenner,et al.  Doing Q methodology: theory, method and interpretation , 2005 .

[37]  Safiya Umoja Noble,et al.  The Intersectional Internet: Race, Sex, Class, and Culture Online , 2016 .

[38]  Li Fei-Fei,et al.  ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database , 2009, CVPR.

[39]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  Social media as a measurement tool of depression in populations , 2013, WebSci.

[40]  M. Bartlett THE STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF CANONICAL CORRELATIONS , 1941 .

[41]  Matthieu Cord,et al.  MUTAN: Multimodal Tucker Fusion for Visual Question Answering , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV).

[42]  Jiebo Luo,et al.  Robust Image Sentiment Analysis Using Progressively Trained and Domain Transferred Deep Networks , 2015, AAAI.

[43]  I. Pavlov,et al.  Conditioned reflexes: An investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral cortex , 2010, Annals of Neurosciences.

[44]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[45]  Jennifer G. Dy,et al.  Active Learning from Crowds , 2011, ICML.

[46]  Adrian Ulges,et al.  Visual Concept Learning from Weakly Labeled Web Videos , 2010, Video Search and Mining.

[47]  Xinlei Chen,et al.  Microsoft COCO Captions: Data Collection and Evaluation Server , 2015, ArXiv.

[48]  Steffen Rendle,et al.  Factorization Machines , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining.

[49]  Philipp Blandfort,et al.  Annotating Social Media Data From Vulnerable Populations: Evaluating Disagreement Between Domain Experts and Graduate Student Annotators , 2019, HICSS.

[50]  Franco Turini,et al.  A Survey of Methods for Explaining Black Box Models , 2018, ACM Comput. Surv..

[51]  Shih-Fu Chang,et al.  Deep Cross Residual Learning for Multitask Visual Recognition , 2016, ACM Multimedia.

[52]  Luo Si,et al.  Mining contrastive opinions on political texts using cross-perspective topic model , 2012, WSDM '12.

[53]  Adrian Ulges,et al.  Pornography detection in video benefits (a lot) from a multi-modal approach , 2012, AMVA '12.

[54]  James Ze Wang,et al.  Content-based image retrieval: approaches and trends of the new age , 2005, MIR '05.

[55]  Yi Li,et al.  R-FCN: Object Detection via Region-based Fully Convolutional Networks , 2016, NIPS.

[56]  Jean Carletta,et al.  Squibs: Reliability Measurement without Limits , 2008, CL.

[57]  John B. Goodenough,et al.  Contextual correlates of synonymy , 1965, CACM.

[58]  W. Stephenson The study of behavior : Q-technique and its methodology , 1955 .

[59]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  Information filtering and information retrieval: two sides of the same coin? , 1992, CACM.

[60]  Yejin Choi,et al.  Composing Simple Image Descriptions using Web-scale N-grams , 2011, CoNLL.

[61]  Raffay Hamid,et al.  What makes an image popular? , 2014, WWW.

[62]  Vicente Ordonez,et al.  Im2Text: Describing Images Using 1 Million Captioned Photographs , 2011, NIPS.

[63]  Byron C. Wallace,et al.  Quantifying Mental Health from Social Media with Neural User Embeddings , 2017, MLHC.

[64]  Pedro M. Domingos A few useful things to know about machine learning , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[65]  Jonathan E King,et al.  Surf and turf wars online--growing implications of Internet gang violence. , 2007, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[66]  I. Olver,et al.  Ricoeur's Theory of Interpretation: An Instrument for Data Interpretation in Hermeneutic Phenomenology , 2009 .

[67]  R. Atkinson,et al.  Accessing Hidden and Hard-to-Reach Populations: Snowball Research Strategies , 2001 .

[68]  Zachary Chase Lipton The mythos of model interpretability , 2016, ACM Queue.

[69]  Katherine A. Keith,et al.  Identifying civilians killed by police with distantly supervised entity-event extraction , 2017, EMNLP.

[70]  David M. Messick,et al.  The group attribution error , 1985 .

[71]  Lior Rokach,et al.  Recommender Systems: Introduction and Challenges , 2015, Recommender Systems Handbook.

[72]  Jeffrey Lane,et al.  The Digital Street , 2016, Oxford Scholarship Online.

[73]  Sorin Adam Matei,et al.  Computational communication research , 2019, WIREs Data Mining Knowl. Discov..

[74]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Understanding, Visualizing and Interpreting Deep Learning Models , 2017, ArXiv.

[75]  Michael S. Bernstein,et al.  Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotations , 2016, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[76]  Christina Kluge Experimental Design In Psychological Research , 2016 .

[77]  Yue Gao,et al.  Continuous Probability Distribution Prediction of Image Emotions via Multitask Shared Sparse Regression , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[78]  P. Schyns,et al.  Measuring Internal Representations from Behavioral and Brain Data , 2012, Current Biology.

[79]  Eric Gilbert,et al.  VADER: A Parsimonious Rule-Based Model for Sentiment Analysis of Social Media Text , 2014, ICWSM.

[80]  John G. Breslin,et al.  A Hierarchical Model of Reviews for Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis , 2016, EMNLP.

[81]  Justin W. Patchin,et al.  Offline Consequences of Online Victimization , 2007 .

[82]  Steffen Rendle,et al.  Factor Models for Recommending Given Names , 2013 .

[83]  A. Damasio The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex. , 1996, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[84]  Margarita Vázquez Campos,et al.  The Notion of Point of View , 2015 .

[85]  Motoaki Kawanabe,et al.  How to Explain Individual Classification Decisions , 2009, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[86]  Ali Farhadi,et al.  You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[87]  A. Nederhof Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review. , 1985 .

[88]  Andreas Dengel,et al.  Which Languages do People Speak on Flickr?: A Language and Geo-Location Study of the YFCC100m Dataset , 2016, MMCommons @ ACM Multimedia.

[89]  S. Milgram BEHAVIORAL STUDY OF OBEDIENCE. , 1963, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[90]  Radu Soricut,et al.  Conceptual Captions: A Cleaned, Hypernymed, Image Alt-text Dataset For Automatic Image Captioning , 2018, ACL.

[91]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Interpretable deep neural networks for single-trial EEG classification , 2016, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[92]  Quoc V. Le,et al.  Distributed Representations of Sentences and Documents , 2014, ICML.

[93]  David A. Cohn,et al.  Active Learning with Statistical Models , 1996, NIPS.

[94]  K. Pearson VII. Note on regression and inheritance in the case of two parents , 1895, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London.

[95]  R. Nickerson Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises , 1998 .

[96]  Steven Schockaert,et al.  Finding locations of flickr resources using language models and similarity search , 2011, ICMR.

[97]  Haris Papageorgiou,et al.  SemEval-2016 Task 5: Aspect Based Sentiment Analysis , 2016, *SEMEVAL.

[98]  Clement T. Yu,et al.  Personalized Web search for improving retrieval effectiveness , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[99]  Jörn Hees,et al.  An Overview of Computational Approaches for Analyzing Interpretation , 2018, ArXiv.

[100]  Xin Jin,et al.  Deep image aesthetics classification using inception modules and fine-tuning connected layer , 2016, 2016 8th International Conference on Wireless Communications & Signal Processing (WCSP).

[101]  J. Chambers,et al.  The handbook of language variation and change , 2003 .

[102]  Gerardo Hermosillo,et al.  Learning From Crowds , 2010, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[103]  Stefan Carlsson,et al.  CNN Features Off-the-Shelf: An Astounding Baseline for Recognition , 2014, 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops.

[104]  Michael S. Bernstein,et al.  Short and tweet: experiments on recommending content from information streams , 2010, CHI.

[105]  Y. Bar-Haim,et al.  Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: a meta-analytic study. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[106]  Jian Sun,et al.  Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[107]  Songbo Tan,et al.  A survey on sentiment detection of reviews , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[108]  Maria L. Rizzo,et al.  Measuring and testing dependence by correlation of distances , 2007, 0803.4101.

[109]  David Tritchler,et al.  Genome-wide sparse canonical correlation of gene expression with genotypes , 2007, BMC proceedings.

[110]  John Ruscio,et al.  Constructing Confidence Intervals for Spearman’s Rank Correlation with Ordinal Data: A Simulation Study Comparing Analytic and Bootstrap Methods , 2008 .

[111]  Andrew M. Saint-Laurent,et al.  Understanding open source and free software licensing - guide to navigation licensing issues in existing and new software , 2004 .

[112]  Andreas Dengel,et al.  Real-time Analysis and Visualization of the YFCC100m Dataset , 2015, MMCommons '15.

[113]  Daniel Gildea,et al.  The Proposition Bank: An Annotated Corpus of Semantic Roles , 2005, CL.

[114]  Marco Baroni,et al.  Nouns are Vectors, Adjectives are Matrices: Representing Adjective-Noun Constructions in Semantic Space , 2010, EMNLP.

[115]  Yehuda Koren,et al.  Factorization meets the neighborhood: a multifaceted collaborative filtering model , 2008, KDD.

[116]  Kok-Lim Low,et al.  Saliency-enhanced image aesthetics class prediction , 2009, 2009 16th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[117]  Jerome L. Myers,et al.  Research Design & Statistical Analysis , 1995 .

[118]  Stephan Trenn,et al.  Multilayer Perceptrons: Approximation Order and Necessary Number of Hidden Units , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[119]  Julien Jacques,et al.  Functional data clustering: a survey , 2013, Advances in Data Analysis and Classification.

[120]  Desmond Upton Patton,et al.  Stop and Frisk Online: Theorizing Everyday Racism in Digital Policing in the Use of Social Media for Identification of Criminal Conduct and Associations , 2017 .

[121]  Jeff A. Bilmes,et al.  Deep Canonical Correlation Analysis , 2013, ICML.

[122]  H. Blumer,et al.  Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method , 1988 .

[123]  H. Hotelling Relations Between Two Sets of Variates , 1936 .

[124]  C. Carbon Cognitive mechanisms for explaining dynamics of aesthetic appreciation , 2011, i-Perception.

[125]  Marcus Liwicki,et al.  Classless Association Using Neural Networks , 2017, ICANN.

[126]  David Vilares,et al.  Detecting Perspectives in Political Debates , 2017, EMNLP.

[127]  Bruno S. Silvestre,et al.  Social Media? Get Serious! Understanding the Functional Building Blocks of Social Media , 2011 .

[128]  Antonio Torralba,et al.  LabelMe: A Database and Web-Based Tool for Image Annotation , 2008, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[129]  Joaquin Quiñonero Candela,et al.  Web-Scale Bayesian Click-Through rate Prediction for Sponsored Search Advertising in Microsoft's Bing Search Engine , 2010, ICML.

[130]  Fei-Fei Li,et al.  Deep visual-semantic alignments for generating image descriptions , 2014, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[131]  Alexander Binder,et al.  On Pixel-Wise Explanations for Non-Linear Classifier Decisions by Layer-Wise Relevance Propagation , 2015, PloS one.

[132]  Zoubin Ghahramani,et al.  Unifying linear dimensionality reduction , 2014, 1406.0873.

[133]  M. Pickering,et al.  Syntactic priming in language production , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[134]  Helmut Feldweg,et al.  GermaNet - a Lexical-Semantic Net for German , 1997 .

[135]  Ricardo Vilalta,et al.  A Perspective View and Survey of Meta-Learning , 2002, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[136]  Carsten Eickhoff,et al.  Cognitive Biases in Crowdsourcing , 2018, WSDM.

[137]  Saltelli Andrea,et al.  Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer , 2008 .

[138]  Frank Keller,et al.  Jointly Representing Images and Text: Dependency Graphs, Word Senses, and Multimodal Embeddings , 2016, iV&L-MM@MM.

[139]  Songjie Gong A Collaborative Filtering Recommendation Algorithm Based on User Clustering and Item Clustering , 2010, J. Softw..

[140]  Rick A Adams,et al.  Computational Psychiatry: towards a mathematically informed understanding of mental illness , 2015, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[141]  F. Maxwell Harper,et al.  The MovieLens Datasets: History and Context , 2016, TIIS.

[142]  Andreas Dengel,et al.  Image Captioning in the Wild: How People Caption Images on Flickr , 2017, MUSA2@MM.

[143]  Yoon Kim,et al.  Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classification , 2014, EMNLP.

[144]  N. McGlynn Thinking fast and slow. , 2014, Australian veterinary journal.

[145]  A. Field,et al.  Distorted cognition and pathological anxiety in children and adolescents , 2008 .

[146]  Matthew S. Gerber,et al.  Predicting crime using Twitter and kernel density estimation , 2014, Decis. Support Syst..

[147]  J. Ardila Meaning in Language. An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics , 2011 .

[148]  D. Fitch,et al.  Review of "Algorithms of oppression: how search engines reinforce racism," by Noble, S. U. (2018). New York, New York: NYU Press. , 2018, CDQR.

[149]  Yuan Yu,et al.  TensorFlow: A system for large-scale machine learning , 2016, OSDI.

[150]  Rossano Schifanella,et al.  VATAS: An Open-Source Web Platform for Visual and Textual Analysis of Social Media , 2020, Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research.

[151]  Saif Mohammad,et al.  SemEval-2016 Task 6: Detecting Stance in Tweets , 2016, *SEMEVAL.

[152]  Hans-Georg Müller,et al.  Functional Data Analysis , 2016 .

[153]  R. Manmatha,et al.  A Model for Learning the Semantics of Pictures , 2003, NIPS.

[154]  E. Guevara A Regression Model of Adjective-Noun Compositionality in Distributional Semantics , 2010 .

[155]  Chen Xu,et al.  The SUN Attribute Database: Beyond Categories for Deeper Scene Understanding , 2014, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[156]  Ross B. Girshick,et al.  Fast R-CNN , 2015, 1504.08083.

[157]  Peter Young,et al.  Framing Image Description as a Ranking Task: Data, Models and Evaluation Metrics , 2013, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[158]  Steffen Rendle Social Network and Click-through Prediction with Factorization Machines , 2012, KDD 2012.

[159]  Stephen Bazen,et al.  The Taylor Decomposition: A Unified Generalization of the Oaxaca Method to Nonlinear Models , 2013 .

[160]  Philipp Cimiano,et al.  Learning Compositionality Functions on Word Embeddings for Modelling Attribute Meaning in Adjective-Noun Phrases , 2017, EACL.

[161]  Ronan Collobert,et al.  Phrase-based Image Captioning , 2015, ICML.

[162]  Adrian Ulges,et al.  Relevance filtering meets active learning: improving web-based concept detectors , 2010, MIR '10.

[163]  H. Hotelling The most predictable criterion. , 1935 .

[164]  Yuefeng Li,et al.  Effective Pattern Discovery for Text Mining , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[165]  Abebe Rorissa,et al.  A comparative study of Flickr tags and index terms in a general image collection , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[166]  Adrian Ulges,et al.  Navidgator - Similarity Based Browsing for Image and Video Databases , 2008, KI.

[167]  Martha Larson,et al.  Intent and its discontents: the user at the wheel of the online video search engine , 2012, ACM Multimedia.

[168]  Max Welling,et al.  Visualizing Deep Neural Network Decisions: Prediction Difference Analysis , 2017, ICLR.

[169]  Soroush Vosoughi,et al.  DeepStance at SemEval-2016 Task 6: Detecting Stance in Tweets Using Character and Word-Level CNNs , 2016, *SEMEVAL.

[170]  Saroj Kaushik,et al.  Topical Stance Detection for Twitter: A Two-Phase LSTM Model Using Attention , 2018, ECIR.

[171]  Lars Schmidt-Thieme,et al.  Pairwise interaction tensor factorization for personalized tag recommendation , 2010, WSDM '10.

[172]  Yue Gao,et al.  Predicting Personalized Image Emotion Perceptions in Social Networks , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing.

[173]  Colin Fyfe,et al.  A neural implementation of canonical correlation analysis , 1999, Neural Networks.

[174]  Margarita Vázquez Campos,et al.  Subjective and Objective Aspects of Points of View , 2015 .

[175]  Sergey Ioffe,et al.  Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Vision , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[176]  Desmond Upton Patton,et al.  Internet banging: New trends in social media, gang violence, masculinity and hip hop , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[177]  Andrew H. Sung,et al.  Ranking importance of input parameters of neural networks , 1998 .

[178]  Vicente Ordonez,et al.  High level describable attributes for predicting aesthetics and interestingness , 2011, CVPR 2011.

[179]  Shu-Ching Chen,et al.  Multimedia Big Data Analytics , 2018, ACM Comput. Surv..

[180]  Tao Chen,et al.  Visual Affect Around the World: A Large-scale Multilingual Visual Sentiment Ontology , 2015, ACM Multimedia.

[181]  Lorenzo Torresani,et al.  AutoCaption: Automatic caption generation for personal photos , 2014, IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision.

[182]  Andreas Dengel,et al.  Introducing Concept And Syntax Transition Networks for Image Captioning , 2016, ICMR.

[183]  George A. Miller,et al.  WordNet: A Lexical Database for English , 1995, HLT.

[184]  Andreas Kleinschmidt,et al.  Ongoing Activity Fluctuations in hMT+ Bias the Perception of Coherent Visual Motion , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[185]  Mark W. Schmidt,et al.  Modeling annotator expertise: Learning when everybody knows a bit of something , 2010, AISTATS.

[186]  L. Ross The Intuitive Psychologist And His Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process1 , 1977 .

[187]  Luc Van Gool,et al.  The Pascal Visual Object Classes (VOC) Challenge , 2010, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[188]  Xavier Giró-i-Nieto,et al.  From pixels to sentiment: Fine-tuning CNNs for visual sentiment prediction , 2016, Image Vis. Comput..

[189]  Charu C. Aggarwal,et al.  A Survey of Text Classification Algorithms , 2012, Mining Text Data.

[190]  J. Bargh,et al.  Automaticity of social behavior: direct effects of trait construct and stereotype-activation on action. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[191]  Rebecca J. Passonneau Computing Reliability for Coreference Annotation , 2004, LREC.

[192]  Jacek M. Zurada,et al.  Sensitivity analysis for minimization of input data dimension for feedforward neural network , 1994, Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems - ISCAS '94.

[193]  Kaiming He,et al.  Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[194]  Timothy Dozat,et al.  Incorporating Nesterov Momentum into Adam , 2016 .

[195]  Andreas Dengel,et al.  Generating Affective Captions using Concept And Syntax Transition Networks , 2016, ACM Multimedia.

[196]  Siobhan Chapman Logic and Conversation , 2005 .

[197]  Juhan Nam,et al.  Multimodal Deep Learning , 2011, ICML.

[198]  Svetlana Lazebnik,et al.  Flickr30k Entities: Collecting Region-to-Phrase Correspondences for Richer Image-to-Sentence Models , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV).

[199]  Lei Zhang,et al.  A Survey of Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis , 2012, Mining Text Data.

[200]  Jens Zimmermann,et al.  Hermeneutics: A Very Short Introduction , 2015 .

[201]  Pietro Perona,et al.  Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context , 2014, ECCV.

[202]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Unconscious semantic priming from pictures , 1999, Cognition.

[203]  Owen Rambow,et al.  Automatically Processing Tweets from Gang-Involved Youth: Towards Detecting Loss and Aggression , 2016, COLING.

[204]  Ruifeng Xu,et al.  Stance Classification with Target-specific Neural Attention , 2017, IJCAI.

[205]  Quoc V. Le,et al.  Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networks , 2014, NIPS.

[206]  Robert LaRose,et al.  Loneliness as the Cause and the Effect of Problematic Internet Use: The Relationship between Internet Use and Psychological Well-Being , 2009, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[207]  Colin Fyfe,et al.  Kernel and Nonlinear Canonical Correlation Analysis , 2000, IJCNN.

[208]  Jeffrey Dean,et al.  Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality , 2013, NIPS.

[209]  Gianluca Demartini,et al.  Scaling-Up the Crowd: Micro-Task Pricing Schemes for Worker Retention and Latency Improvement , 2014, HCOMP.

[210]  Rongrong Ji,et al.  Large-scale visual sentiment ontology and detectors using adjective noun pairs , 2013, ACM Multimedia.

[211]  Susan T. Dumais,et al.  Personalized information delivery: an analysis of information filtering methods , 1992, CACM.

[212]  A. Damasio,et al.  Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[213]  Samy Bengio,et al.  Show and tell: A neural image caption generator , 2014, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[214]  Rob Kitchin,et al.  The data revolution : big data, open data, data infrastructures & their consequences , 2014 .

[215]  Geoffrey Zweig,et al.  From captions to visual concepts and back , 2014, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[216]  Steven Bird,et al.  NLTK: The Natural Language Toolkit , 2002, ACL.

[217]  Emily B. Falk,et al.  Big Data under the Microscope and Brains in Social Context , 2015 .

[218]  Christopher S. G. Khoo,et al.  Aspect-based sentiment analysis of movie reviews on discussion boards , 2010, J. Inf. Sci..

[219]  Cyrus Rashtchian,et al.  Every Picture Tells a Story: Generating Sentences from Images , 2010, ECCV.

[220]  William R. Frey,et al.  Artificial Intelligence and Inclusion: Formerly Gang-Involved Youth as Domain Experts for Analyzing Unstructured Twitter Data , 2018, Social science computer review.

[221]  Rashmi Prasad,et al.  Annotating Discourse Connectives and Their Arguments , 2004, FCP@NAACL-HLT.

[222]  Chu-Song Chen,et al.  Assessment of photo aesthetics with efficiency , 2012, Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR2012).

[223]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[224]  GarbarinoJames Gun Violence in Chicago , 2017 .

[225]  Richard S. Sutton,et al.  Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction , 1998, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.