Bayesian Hierarchical Models for Inference About Population Growth

Mark recapture models have long been used for estimating wildlife population parameters. Typically, the data are summarized in terms of parameters that are interpreted in the context of an implicit demographic model for describing population dynamics. Usually, this demographic model plays little or no role in the mark-recapture model. Bayesian hierarchical models (BHM) offer a way to explicitly include demographic models in an analysis. We argue that such an approach should have wide appeal to ecologists as it allows inference to focus on ecological models of interest rather than obtaining a parsimonious depiction of the sampling process. We discuss the use of BHM’s for modeling mark-recapture data with a focus on models describing density-dependent growth.

[1]  M. Conroy,et al.  Modeling demographic processes in marked populations , 2009 .

[2]  K. Burnham,et al.  Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals , 1999 .

[3]  R. Cormack Estimates of survival from the sighting of marked animals , 1964 .

[4]  G. Jolly EXPLICIT ESTIMATES FROM CAPTURE-RECAPTURE DATA WITH BOTH DEATH AND IMMIGRATION-STOCHASTIC MODEL. , 1965, Biometrika.

[5]  Jean-Dominique Lebreton,et al.  Population models for Greater Snow Geese: a comparison of different approaches to assess potential impacts of harvest , 2004 .

[6]  S. Brooks,et al.  A Bayesian approach to combining animal abundance and demographic data , 2004 .

[7]  Roger Pradel,et al.  M-SURGE: new software specifically designed for multistate capture-recapture models , 2004 .

[8]  M. Conroy,et al.  Analysis and Management of Animal Populations , 2002 .

[9]  P. Green Reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo computation and Bayesian model determination , 1995 .

[10]  W. A. Link,et al.  Hierarchial mark–recapture models: a framework for inference about demographic processes , 2004 .

[11]  Michael J. Conroy,et al.  Analysis of individual- and time-specific covariate effects on survival of Serinus serinus in north-eastern Spain , 2002 .

[12]  Charles M. Francis,et al.  Estimating components of variance in demographic parameters of Tawny Owls, Strix aluco , 2004 .

[13]  Richard J. Barker,et al.  A Further Step Toward the Mother-of-All-Models: Flexibility and Functionality in the Modeling of Capture–Recapture Data , 2009 .

[14]  H. Caswell,et al.  Beyond survival estimation: mark-recapture, matrix population models, and population dynamics , 2004 .

[15]  James D. Nichols,et al.  Evolution of quantitative methods for the study and management of avian populations: on the importance of individual contributions , 2004 .

[16]  G. Seber A NOTE ON THE MULTIPLE-RECAPTURE CENSUS. , 1965, Biometrika.

[17]  J. Tautin,et al.  Large-scale studies of marked birds in North America , 1999 .

[18]  Doug P. Armstrong,et al.  Density-dependent population growth in a reintroduced population of North Island saddlebacks , 2005 .

[19]  Doug P Armstrong,et al.  Adaptive Harvesting of Source Populations for Translocation: a Case Study with New Zealand Robins , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[20]  Carl J. Schwarz,et al.  POPAN-6: Exploring convergence and estimate properties with SIMULATE , 2002 .

[21]  Bradley P. Carlin,et al.  Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit , 2002 .

[22]  Gilles Gauthier,et al.  Effects of spring conditions on breeding propensity of Greater Snow Goose females , 2004 .

[23]  Byron J. T. Morgan,et al.  Modelling the survival of British Lapwings Vanellus vanellus using ring-recovery data and weather covariates , 1999 .