Normalization and Scaling for Human Response Corridors and Development of Injury Risk Curves

To ‘collate’ impact response data from a group of samples from tests using unembalmed human cadavers (Post-Mortem Human Subjects, PMHS) for crashworthiness applications, it is important to transform the fundamental measured variable such as acceleration, force and deflection to a standard or reference, termed as normalization. Scaling can be defined as a process by which normalized data can be transformed from one Standard to another (example, mid-size adult male to large-male and small-size female adults, and pediatric populations). This chapter examines the pros and cons of approaches used in normalization/scaling processes for over four decades in impact biomechanics, with a focus on automotive applications. Specifically, the equal stress equal velocity and impulse momentum methods are discussed. The process of corridor development is critical to ensure that all anthropomorphic test devices mimic human impact responses. The chapter also examines methods used in developing human corridors, ranging from subjective to objective approaches in terms of incorporating individual variations or spread in the measured metrics. The variability in the response should also be taken into account in the determination of the human tolerance to impact, routinely used as a tool to improve occupant protection in crashes. Human tolerance can be expressed in terms of a human injury risk curve. The different empirical and statistical methods historically used in the biomechanical field to develop injury risk curves are presented in this chapter. The normalization group ISO/TC22/SC12/WG6 recommended a procedure to construct injury risk curves aiming at harmonizing the development of injury risk curves. This procedure is presented in detail. It includes several steps taking into account the specific censored status of the biomechanical data and including some checks related to the statistical modeling of the injury risk. Topics allowing future improvement of the procedure are discussed.

[1]  Xavier Trosseille,et al.  Statistical simulations to evaluate the methods of the construction of injury risk curves. , 2011, Stapp car crash journal.

[2]  David C. Viano,et al.  Biomechanical responses and injuries in blunt lateral impact , 1989 .

[3]  D. Parkinson,et al.  Bayesian Methods in Cosmology: Model selection and multi-model inference , 2009 .

[4]  Rolf H. Eppinger,et al.  Prediction of thoracic injury using measurable experimental parameters , 1976 .

[5]  Tony R. Laituri,et al.  Predictions of AIS3+ Thoracic Risks for Belted Occupants in Full-Engagement, Real-World Frontal Impacts: Sensitivity to Various Theoretical Risk Curves , 2003 .

[6]  Rolf H. Eppinger,et al.  Development of dummy and injury index for NHTSA's thoracic side impact protection research program , 1984 .

[7]  Rolf H. Eppinger,et al.  Quantification of Side Impact Responses and Injuries , 1981 .

[8]  John M. Cavanaugh,et al.  Biomechanical Response and Injury Tolerance of the Pelvis in Twelve Sled Side Impacts , 1990 .

[9]  Greg Shaw,et al.  A Normalization Technique for Developing Corridors from Individual Subject Responses , 2004 .

[10]  John W. Melvin Injury Assessment Reference Values for the CRABI 6-Month Infant Dummy in a Rear-Facing Infant Restraint with Airbag Deployment , 1995 .

[11]  L Di Domenico,et al.  Risk Curve Boundaries , 2005, Traffic injury prevention.

[12]  Matthew R. Maltese,et al.  CHESTBAND ANALYSIS OF HUMAN TOLERANCE TO SIDE IMPACT , 1997 .

[13]  H. J. Mertz,et al.  Interpretations of the Impact Responses of a 3-Year-Old Child Dummy Relative to Child Injury Potential , 1982 .

[14]  David W. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Survival Analysis: Regression Modeling of Time-to-Event Data , 2008 .

[15]  R H Eppinger,et al.  Mechanisms of thoracic injury in frontal impact. , 1996, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[16]  Narayan Yoganandan,et al.  Response corridors of the human head-neck complex in rear impact. , 2004, Annual proceedings. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine.

[17]  C. K. Kroell,et al.  Impact Response of the Human Thorax , 1973 .

[18]  M. Ramet,et al.  EVALUATION OF PELVIC FRACTURE TOLERANCE IN SIDE IMPACT , 1980 .

[19]  Narayan Yoganandan,et al.  Biomechanics of human thoracolumbar spinal column trauma from vertical impact loading. , 2013, Annals of advances in automotive medicine. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. Annual Scientific Conference.

[20]  Kevin Moorhouse An Improved Normalization Methodology for Developing Mean Human Response Curves , 2008 .

[21]  Harold J. Mertz,et al.  A procedure for normalizing impact response data , 1984 .

[22]  Koichi Kamiji,et al.  Whole-body response to pure lateral impact. , 2010, Stapp car crash journal.

[23]  Rolf H. Eppinger,et al.  DYNAMIC AXIAL TOLERANCE OF THE HUMAN FOOT-ANKLE COMPLEX , 1996 .

[24]  Rolf H. Eppinger,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF A PROMISING UNIVERSAL THORACIC TRAUMA PREDICTION METHODOLOGY , 1978 .

[25]  H. T. McAdams The Repeatability of Dummy Performance , 1973 .

[26]  M. Ramet,et al.  Tolerance of human pelvis to fracture and proposed pelvic protection criterion to be measured on side impact dummies , 1982 .

[27]  Jonathan D. Rupp,et al.  PMHS impact response in low and high-speed nearside impacts , 2011 .

[28]  N. Yoganandan,et al.  Force and Acceleration Corridors from Lateral Head Impact , 2004, Traffic injury prevention.

[29]  Narayan Yoganandan,et al.  Deflection, Acceleration, and Force Corridors for Small Females in Side Impacts , 2005, Traffic injury prevention.

[30]  Jeffrey Richard Crandall,et al.  Whole‐Body Kinematics: Response Corridors for Restrained PMHS in Frontal Impacts , 2012 .

[31]  D. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[32]  Srirangam Kumaresan,et al.  Biomechanical Assessment of Human Cervical Spine Ligaments , 1998 .

[33]  Narayan Yoganandan,et al.  Biomechanics of side impact: injury criteria, aging occupants, and airbag technology. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[34]  Rolf H Eppinger,et al.  Response corridors of human surrogates in lateral impacts. , 2002, Stapp car crash journal.

[35]  Heiko Johannsen,et al.  Estimating Q-dummy injury criteria using the CASPER project results and scaling adult reference values , 2012 .

[36]  Rolf H. Eppinger,et al.  Correlation of Side Impact Dummy/Cadaver Tests , 1981 .

[37]  Richard W. Kent,et al.  Data Censoring and Parametric Distribution Assignment in the Development of Injury Risk Functions from Biochemical Data , 2004 .

[38]  Michael Kleinberger,et al.  Biomechanical Considerations for Child Occupant Protection , 1998 .

[39]  W. W. Muir,et al.  Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity , 1980 .

[40]  M. Craig,et al.  Development of brain injury criteria (BrIC). , 2013, Stapp car crash journal.

[41]  Norbert Praxl How reliable are injury risk curves , 2011 .

[42]  Guy S. Nusholtz,et al.  Comparison of parametric and non-parametric methods for determining injury risk , 2003 .

[43]  Rolf H. Eppinger,et al.  Human Response to and Injury from Lateral Impact , 1983 .

[44]  Harold J. Mertz Injury Risk Assessments Based on Dummy Responses , 2002 .

[45]  Xavier Trosseille,et al.  Study of rib fracture mechanisms based on the rib strain profiles in side and forward oblique impact. , 2011, Stapp car crash journal.

[46]  M. Ramet,et al.  Pelvic Tolerance and Protection Criteria in Side Impact , 1982 .

[47]  Roger P. Daniel,et al.  A Biomechanical Analysis of Head, Neck, and Torso Injuries to Child Surrogates Due to Sudden Torso Acceleration , 1984 .

[48]  Annette L. Irwin,et al.  Displacement responses of the shoulder and thorax in lateral sled impacts , 1993 .

[49]  Guy S. Nusholtz,et al.  Consistent threshold estimate for doubly censored biomechanical data , 1999 .

[50]  Rolf H Eppinger,et al.  Development of Side Impact Thoracic Injury Criteria and Their Application to the Modified ES-2 Dummy with Rib Extensions (ES-2re). , 2003, Stapp car crash journal.

[51]  H. Mertz,et al.  HEAD INJURY RISK ASSESSMENT FOR FOREHEAD IMPACTS , 1996 .

[52]  Xavier Trosseille,et al.  Injury risk curves for the WorldSID 50th male dummy. , 2009, Stapp car crash journal.

[53]  P. L. Majewski,et al.  Measurement of Head, T 1 , and Pelvic Response to -Gx Impact Acceleration , 1977 .

[54]  Harold J. Mertz,et al.  INJURY RISK CURVES FOR CHILDREN AND ADULTS IN FRONTAL AND REAR COLLISIONS , 1997 .

[55]  Steven Millington,et al.  Injury tolerance and response of the ankle joint in dynamic dorsiflexion. , 2004, Stapp car crash journal.

[56]  Lan Wang,et al.  Injury Risk Assessment of Several Crash Data Sets , 2003 .

[57]  N Yoganandan,et al.  Biomechanics of abdominal injuries. , 2001, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[58]  Erik G. Takhounts,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF IMPROVED INJURY CRITERIA FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF ADVANCED AUTOMOTIVE RESTRAINT SYSTEMS - II , 1999 .

[59]  N Yoganandan,et al.  Geometric and mechanical properties of human cervical spine ligaments. , 2000, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[60]  Narayan Yoganandan,et al.  Oblique lateral impact biofidelity deflection corridors from Post Mortem Human Surrogates. , 2013, Stapp car crash journal.

[61]  Kristy B Arbogast,et al.  Comparison of kinematic responses of the head and spine for children and adults in low-speed frontal sled tests. , 2009, Stapp car crash journal.

[62]  John H Bolte,et al.  Oblique and lateral impact response of the PMHS thorax. , 2006, Stapp car crash journal.

[63]  Rolf H Eppinger,et al.  The effects of axial preload and dorsiflexion on the tolerance of the ankle/subtalar joint to dynamic inversion and eversion. , 2002, Stapp car crash journal.

[64]  Matthew P Reed,et al.  PMHS impact response in 3 m/s and 8 m/s nearside impacts with abdomen offset. , 2013, Stapp car crash journal.

[65]  Yuko Nakahira,et al.  A combined evaluation method and a modified maximum likelihood method for injury risk curves , 2000 .

[66]  A Elhagediab,et al.  Biomechanical properties of human lumbar spine ligaments. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[67]  N Yoganandan,et al.  Effect of Age and Loading Rate on Human Cervical Spine Injury Threshold , 1998, Spine.