Instrumented Usability Analysis for Mobile Devices

Instrumented usability analysis involves the use of sensors during a usability study which provide observations from which the evaluator can infer details of the context of use, specific activities or disturbances. This is particularly useful for the evaluation of mobile and wearable devices, which are currently difficult to test realistically without constraining users in unnatural ways. To illustrate the benefits of such an approach, we present a study of touch-screen selection of on-screen targets, whilst walking and sitting, using a PocketPC instrumented with an accelerometer. From the accelerometer data the user’s gait behaviour is inferred, allowing us to link performance to gait phase angle, showing there were phase regions with significantly lower error and variability. The article provides examples of how information acquired via sensors gives us quantitatively measurable information about the detailed interactions taking place when mobile, allowing designers to test and revise design decisions, based on realistic user activity.

[1]  Vuokko Lantz,et al.  Rhythmic interaction with a mobile device , 2004, NordiCHI '04.

[2]  Jan Stage,et al.  New techniques for usability evaluation of mobile systems , 2004, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[3]  Stephen A. Brewster,et al.  Gestural and audio metaphors as a means of control for mobile devices , 2002, CHI.

[4]  Gurpreet Dhillon,et al.  Social Responsibility in the Information Age: Issues and Controversies , 2001 .

[5]  Virpi Roto,et al.  Examining mobile phone use in the wild with quasi-experimentation , 2004 .

[6]  Rodrigo José Firmino,et al.  ICTs for Mobile and Ubiquitous Urban Infrastructures: Surveillance, Locative Media and Global Networks , 2010 .

[7]  Jörg Schwenk,et al.  On Cryptographically Strong Bindings of SAML Assertions to Transport Layer Security , 2011, Int. J. Mob. Comput. Multim. Commun..

[8]  SearsAndrew,et al.  An empirical comparison of use-in-motion evaluation scenarios for mobile computing devices , 2005 .

[9]  Marie-Luce Bourguet,et al.  A Usability Framework for the Design and Evaluation of Multimodal Interaction: Application to a Multimodal Mobile Phone , 2010 .

[10]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  Foreground and background interaction with sensor-enhanced mobile devices , 2005, TCHI.

[11]  Roderick Murray-Smith,et al.  Shoogle: excitatory multimodal interaction on mobile devices , 2007, CHI.

[12]  Matthew Chalmers,et al.  Using Location, Bearing and Motion Data to Filter Video and System Logs , 2007, Pervasive.

[13]  Fabio Paternò,et al.  Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices , 2002, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[14]  Slobodan Petrovic,et al.  Improving Effectiveness of Intrusion Detection by Correlation Feature Selection , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security.

[15]  Bing Jiang,et al.  I Sense a Disturbance in the Force: Unobtrusive Detection of Interactions with RFID-tagged Objects , 2004, UbiComp.

[16]  Roderick Murray-Smith,et al.  Shoogle: multimodal excitatory interaction on mobile devices , 2007 .

[17]  A. Morrison,et al.  Coordinated Visualisation of Video and System Log Data , 2006, Fourth International Conference on Coordinated & Multiple Views in Exploratory Visualization (CMV'06).

[18]  Andrew Sears,et al.  An empirical comparison of use-in-motion evaluation scenarios for mobile computing devices , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[19]  Ricardo Colomo Palacios,et al.  Personnel Performance Appraisal Coverage in ITIL, COBIT and CMMi: A Study from the Perspective of People-CMM , 2011, Int. J. Knowl. Soc. Res..

[20]  David Taniar.  Encyclopedia of Mobile Computing and Commerce , 2007 .

[21]  Andrew Sears,et al.  Context awareness via a single device-attached accelerometer during mobile computing , 2005, Mobile HCI.

[22]  Gitte Lindgaard,et al.  UI Design for Mobile Technology in a Closed Environment , 2008 .

[23]  Mark H. Chignell,et al.  Mobile text entry: relationship between walking speed and text input task difficulty , 2005, Mobile HCI.

[24]  David Taniar,et al.  International Journal of Mobile Computing and Multimedia Communications , 2010 .

[25]  Stephen A. Brewster,et al.  Gait phase effects in mobile interaction , 2005, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[26]  Stephen A. Brewster,et al.  Overcoming the Lack of Screen Space on Mobile Computers , 2002, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[27]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Synchronization: Phase locking and frequency entrainment , 2001 .

[28]  G. Fleet,et al.  Browser-Less Surfing and Mobile Internet Access , 2007 .

[29]  Karen D. Loch,et al.  The Societal Impact of the World Wide Web: Key Challenges for the 21st Century , 2001, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[30]  Gordon Bell,et al.  Passive capture and ensuing issues for a personal lifetime store , 2004, CARPE'04.

[31]  Virpi Roto,et al.  Interaction in 4-second bursts: the fragmented nature of attentional resources in mobile HCI , 2005, CHI.

[32]  David Taniar,et al.  Mobile Computing: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications , 2008 .

[33]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Synchronization - A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences , 2001, Cambridge Nonlinear Science Series.

[34]  Witold Abramowicz,et al.  Usability Driven Open Platform for Mobile Government (USE-ME.GOV) , 2008 .

[35]  Keith Cheverst,et al.  Exploring Personal Mobile Phones and Digital Display Systems to Support Indoor Navigation by Formative Study Methods , 2010, Int. J. Handheld Comput. Res..

[36]  Albrecht Schmidt,et al.  Multi-sensor Activity Context Detection for Wearable Computing , 2003, EUSAI.