Understanding demand volatility in supply chains through the vibrations analogy—the onion supply case

Fluctuating demand for goods in many situations is not caused by genuine discontinuities in the consumption or usage of those goods. Basic food products, for example, are consumed at relatively stable rates. But disruptions in their supply—real or imputed—may cause demand volatility with consequences of unwanted price fluctuations. In this paper, the vibrations analogy is proposed to better understand this phenomenon. Various alternative scenarios of damping vibrations are discussed in this paper, viz., underdamped, overdamped, and critically damped system. An interpretation of those scenarios is offered with respect to their meaning to supply chain management and illustrated through the case of the onion supply. The proposed analogy is found to be useful in explaining and taking appropriate steps for improvement in such cases.

[1]  Christos D. Tarantilis,et al.  Dynamic modeling and control of supply chain systems: A review , 2008, Comput. Oper. Res..

[2]  Sanjay Sharma A method to exchange the demand of products for cost improvement , 2009 .

[3]  Pietro Romano,et al.  How can fluid dynamics help supply chain management , 2009 .

[4]  Sanjay Sharma Single/ multiple parameter swapping in the context of Sanjay Sharma’s Theory of Exchange , 2009 .

[5]  Christopher S. Tang,et al.  The Value of Information Sharing in a Two-Level Supply Chain , 2000 .

[6]  S. Chopra,et al.  Managing Risk To Avoid Supply-Chain Breakdown , 2004 .

[7]  S. Graham Kelly,et al.  Fundamentals of Mechanical Vibrations , 1992 .

[8]  Sanjay Sharma On the flexibility of demand and production rate , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  Özalp Özer,et al.  Trust in Forecast Information Sharing , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[10]  Varun Grover,et al.  Examining the Impact of Interorganizational Systems on Process Efficiency and Sourcing Leverage in Buyer-Supplier Dyads , 2005, Decis. Sci..

[11]  G. Schuh,et al.  Turbulence in Production Systems – Fluid Dynamics and its Contributions to Production Theory , 2009 .

[12]  N. Sanders,et al.  MODELING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FIRM IT CAPABILITY, COLLABORATION, AND PERFORMANCE , 2005 .

[13]  I. Chen,et al.  Towards a theory of supply chain management: the constructs and measurements , 2004 .

[14]  Lianjun An,et al.  Application of control theoretic principles to manage inventory replenishment in a supply chain , 2008 .

[15]  S. Hohmann The Bullwhip Effect in Supply Chains , 2014 .

[16]  Arshinder,et al.  Supply chain coordination: Perspectives, empirical studies and research directions , 2008 .

[17]  Karen Donohue,et al.  Behavioral Causes of the Bullwhip Effect and the Observed Value of Inventory Information , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[18]  Ilhyung Kim,et al.  Measuring endogenous supply chain volatility: Beyond the bullwhip effect , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  T. V. D. Vaart,et al.  Opportunities and realities of supply chain integration: the case of food manufacturers , 2008 .

[20]  Z. Shen,et al.  The impact of ordering behavior on order-quantity variability: a study of forward and reverse bullwhip effects , 2008 .

[21]  Sanjay Sharma Effects concerning quality level with the increase in production rate , 2011 .

[22]  Sanjay Sharma,et al.  Extending Sanjay Sharma's theory of exchange , 2009 .

[23]  Sanjay Sharma,et al.  Multiple sourcing decisions using integrated AHP and knapsack model: a case on carton sourcing , 2010 .

[24]  Samuel H. Huang,et al.  Designing supply chains: Towards theory development , 2006 .

[25]  S. Disney,et al.  Vendor-managed inventory and bullwhip reduction in a two-level supply chain , 2003 .

[26]  K. Lai,et al.  The antecedents of dyadic quality performance and its effect on buyer-supplier relationship improvement , 2009 .

[27]  Sanjay Sharma Theory of exchange , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[28]  T. C. Edwin Cheng,et al.  Institutional isomorphism and the adoption of information technology for supply chain management , 2006, Comput. Ind..

[29]  Sanjay Sharma,et al.  Development of supplier relationship including cost of defectives in the cyclic production , 2013 .

[30]  Vineet Padmanabhan,et al.  Comments on "Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect" , 1997, Manag. Sci..

[31]  R. Akkerman,et al.  An optimization approach for managing fresh food quality throughout the supply chain , 2011 .

[32]  Sanjay Sharma Policies concerning decisions related to quality level , 2010 .

[33]  Stephen M. Disney,et al.  Measuring and avoiding the bullwhip effect: A control theoretic approach , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[34]  Georgia Perakis,et al.  Fluid dynamics models and their applications in transportation and pricing , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[35]  Sanjay Sharma A composite model in the context of a production-inventory system , 2009, Optim. Lett..

[36]  R. Shapiro,et al.  From supply chain to demand chain: the role of lead time reduction in improving demand chain performance , 2004 .