Hydraulics and well testing of engineered geothermal reservoirs

Abstract In most engineered reservoirs the water to extract the geothermal energy must be supplied, i.e., forced into the reservoir, rather than merely extracted as is common for conventional geothermal reservoirs. One operational hydraulic parameter of great interest is the impedance, which measures how much pressure is required to force water at unit flow rate through the reservoir. For practical purposes, the impedance should be less than 1 MPa s/l, and economic competitiveness with conventional reservoirs requires values one tenth as large. Most engineered reservoirs operated to date have met the upper requirement, and some are approaching the lower. Another parameter of great practical interest is the water loss rate, i.e. the difference between the rates of water injected and produced. Water losses and impedance are very pressure-dependent, but impedance is inversely so—high pressure increases water loss, but decreases the impedance. Hence operators may select strategies to meet their requirements. In some tight rock formations such as those at the Fenton Hill, USA, reservoir, the water loss rate may be so small that the pressure may be maximized to reduce impedance and increase energy production. In more permeable rock formations, the water losses may be quite high, so pressure and energy production may have to be limited. But in some cases, e.g. the reservoir at Soultz, France, there may be enough native permeability and water in place that more water actually may be extracted with downhole pumps from the reservoir than is injected.

[1]  Bruce A. Robinson,et al.  Dispersed fluid flow in fractured reservoirs: An analysis of tracer‐determined residence time distributions , 1984 .

[2]  Eckart Hurtig,et al.  Fibre-optic temperature measurements in shallow boreholes: experimental application for fluid logging , 1994 .

[3]  R. Jung Hydraulic fracturing and hydraulic testing in the granitic sections of borehole GPK1, Soultz sous Forêts , 1991 .

[4]  Tsutomu Yamaguchi,et al.  Fluid circulation and heat extraction from engineered geothermal reservoirs , 1999 .

[5]  R. Jung,et al.  Hydraulic in situ investigations of an artificial fracture in the Falkenberg granite , 1989 .

[6]  Uk Cornwall,et al.  Hot dry rock , 1990 .

[7]  H. D. Murphy,et al.  Experiments with non-Darcy flow in joints with large scale roughness , 1985 .

[8]  R. J. Hopkirk,et al.  Observation and simulation of non‐Darcian flow transients in fractured rock , 1997 .

[9]  Modelling tracer tests in the Rosemanowes HDR reservoir , 1995 .

[10]  M. Fehler,et al.  Identification of MHF (massive hydraulic fracturing) fracture planes and flow paths: A correlation of well log data with patterns in locations of induced seismicity , 1987 .

[11]  Reinhard Jung,et al.  The European HDR project at Soultz sous forets: Stimulation of the second deep well and first circulation experiments , 1996 .

[12]  D. A. Nicol,et al.  The performance and characteristics of the experimental hot dry rock geothermal reservoir at Rosemanowes, Cornwall (1985–1988) , 1994 .

[13]  Hideaki Takahashi,et al.  New project for Hot Wet Rock geothermal reservoir design concept , 1992 .

[14]  J. Andrews,et al.  222Rn solution by the circulating fluids in a "hot dry rock" geothermal reservoir , 1986 .

[15]  Daniel Swenson,et al.  MODELING FLOW IN A JOINTED GEOTHERMAL RESERVOIR , 1994 .

[16]  Jefferson W. Tester,et al.  Interwell Tracer Analyses of a Hydraulically Fractured Granitic Geothermal Reservoir , 1982 .

[17]  D. W. Brown,et al.  The potential for large errors in the inferred minimum earth stress when using incomplete hydraulic fracturing results , 1989 .

[18]  Donald W. Brown,et al.  HDR reservoir flow impedance and potential for impedance reduction , 1993 .

[19]  Y. Tsang Usage of “Equivalent apertures” for rock fractures as derived from hydraulic and tracer tests , 1992 .