Finite element study of intramedullary osteosynthesis in the treatment of trochanteric fractures of the hip: Gamma and PFN.

The ongoing debate surrounding the surgical treatment of trochanteric hip fractures, particularly unstable fractures, has led to continuous changes in the design of well-established implants and to the development of new ones. The goal of this paper was to use a finite element simulation to compare the biomechanical behaviour of two intramedullary implants most often used at the University Hospital of Zaragoza: the standard Gamma nail (Howmedica) and the proximal femoral nail (PFN, Stratec). The main focus was on the displacements of the fracture focus and the stress distributions along the femur and the implant. Both nails produced an important redistribution of stress in the bone tissue, but the redistribution of peak stress was higher for the Gamma nail. On the other hand, with PFN there were smaller displacements at the fracture site. Finally, under the same workload, the Gamma nail supported higher stresses than the PFN.

[1]  T. Reiter,et al.  Finite element analysis of the stress distributions in the proximal end of the femur after stabilization of a pertrochanteric model fracture: a comparison of two implants. , 1995, Injury.

[2]  S. Boriani,et al.  A technical report reviewing the use of the 11-mm Gamma nail: interoperative femur fracture incidence. , 1996, Orthopedics.

[3]  A L Yettram,et al.  Finite element analysis of a Gamma nail within a fractured femur. , 1998, Medical engineering & physics.

[4]  F. Kummer,et al.  A biomechanical evaluation of the Gamma nail. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[5]  F. Hofeldt,et al.  Proximal femoral fractures. , 1987, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[6]  C. van der Werken,et al.  The AO/ASIF-proximal femoral nail (PFN): a new device for the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures. , 1999, Injury.

[7]  J. Vroemen,et al.  Biomechanical analysis of the Gamma nail and sliding hip screw. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  A. Patel,et al.  Fixation of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. A randomised prospective comparison of the gamma nail and the dynamic hip screw. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[9]  C. Snijders,et al.  Prevention of fracture at the distal locking site of the gamma nail. A biomechanical study. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[10]  Salit Kark,et al.  A dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy , 2000 .

[11]  B. Cunningham,et al.  Proximal femoral fractures: a biomechanical study to compare intramedullary and extramedullary fixation. , 1994, Injury.

[12]  Wolf Gl,et al.  Treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of the femur using sliding screw plate fixation. , 1982, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[13]  T. Hearn,et al.  Fixation of Segmental Subtrochanteric Fractures: A Biomechanical Study , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[14]  A Grosse,et al.  Closed locked intramedullary nailing. Its application to comminuted fractures of the femur. , 1985, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  K. Leung,et al.  Gamma nails and dynamic hip screws for peritrochanteric fractures. A randomised prospective study in elderly patients. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[16]  R. Huiskes,et al.  Acrylic cement creeps but does not allow much subsidence of femoral stems , 1997 .