Quantifiers in Natural Languages: Some Logical Problems, I

Quantifiers are by common consent among the most important ingredients in the logical structure of both formalized and natural languages. As we all know, formalized quantifiers and their generalizations have been studied extensively by logicians. In contrast, relatively little close attention has been paid to the peculiarities of the logical behavior of quantifiers in natural languages, in spite of the fact that quantifiers have figured conspicuously in some of the most important recent methodological controversies in linguistics.1 It is the. purpose of this paper to help to change this situation by surveying some of the non-trivial logical phenomena that we find in examining natural-language quantifiers. In doing so, I am largely restricting my attention to the natural-language counterparts of logicians’ existential quantifier and universal quantifier, neglecting such ‘nonstandard’ quantifier words as ‘many’ and ‘most’. I shall cover in the survey a number earlier observations of mine which have already been partly published,2 but I shall also try to concentrate on certain new insights which serve to extend and to consolidate the old results.

[1]  Donald Davidson,et al.  In Defense of Convention T , 1973 .

[2]  J. C. Shepherdson,et al.  Reduktionstheorie des Entscheidungsproblems im Pradikatenkalkul der ersten Stufe , 1961, The Mathematical Gazette.

[3]  Wilbur John Walkoe,et al.  Finite Partially-Ordered Quantification , 1970, J. Symb. Log..

[4]  Jaakko Hintikka,et al.  Quantifiers in Logic and Quantifiers in Natural Languages , 1979 .

[5]  D. Davidson,et al.  True to the Facts , 1969 .

[6]  Z. Vendler.  I.—EACH AND EVERY, ANY AND ALL , 1962 .

[7]  Willard Van Orman Quine,et al.  Philosophy of Logic. , 1988 .

[8]  Jaakko Hintikka,et al.  Quantifiers vs. Quantification Theory , 1973 .

[9]  J. Hintikka.  The Prospects for Convention T , 1976 .

[10]  Jaakko Hintikka,et al.  Semantical Games and the Bach-Peters Paradox , 1975 .

[11]  George Lakoff,et al.  On Generative Semantics , 1969 .

[12]  Jaakko Hintikka,et al.  Models for modalities , 1975 .

[13]  Jaakko Hintikka,et al.  Impossible possible worlds vindicated , 1975, J. Philos. Log..

[14]  Jaakko Hintikka,et al.  Partially Ordered Quantifiers vs. Partially Ordered Ideas , 1976 .

[15]  Asa Kasher,et al.  Language in Focus Foundations, Methods, and Systems : Essays in Memory of Yehoshua Bar-Hillel , 1976 .

[16]  D. Terence Langendoen,et al.  Studies in linguistic semantics , 1979 .

[17]  Jaakko Hintikka,et al.  Conditionals, Generic Quantifiers, and Other Applications of Subgames , 1979 .

[18]  JAAKKO HINTIKKA,et al.  PRONOUNS OF LAZINESS IN GAME-THEORETICAL SEMANTICS , 1977 .

[19]  Hartley Rogers,et al.  Certain Logical Reduction and Decision Problems , 1956 .

[20]  J. Hintikka.  A counterexample to Tarski-type truth-definitions as applied to natural languages , 1975 .

[21]  Joseph S. Wholey,et al.  Review: Janos Suranyi, Reduktionstheorie des Entscheidungsproblems im Pradikatenkalkul der Ersten Stufe , 1960, Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[22]  Erik Stenius,et al.  Comments on Jaakko Hintikka's paper “Quantifiers vs. Quantification theory”* , 1976 .

[23]  D. Davidson.  On Saying That , 1968 .

[24]  D. Davidson.  Truth and Meaning , 1967 .