Smaller than predicted increase in aboveground net primary production and yield of field‐grown soybean under fully open‐air [CO2] elevation

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change projects that atmospheric [CO2] will reach 550 ppm by 2050. Numerous assessments of plant response to elevated [CO2] have been conducted in chambers and enclosures, with only a few studies reporting responses in fully open‐air, field conditions. Reported yields for the world's two major grain crops, wheat and rice, are substantially lower in free‐air CO2 enrichment (FACE) than predicted from similar elevated [CO2] experiments within chambers. This discrepancy has major implications for forecasting future global food supply. Globally, the leguminous‐crop soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) is planted on more land than any other dicotyledonous crop. Previous studies have shown that total dry mass production increased on average 37% in response to increasing [CO2] to approximately 700 ppm, but harvestable yield will increase only 24%. Is this representative of soybean responses under open‐air field conditions? The effects of elevation of [CO2] to 550 ppm on total production, partitioning and yield of soybean over 3 years are reported. This is the first FACE study of soybean (http://www.soyface.uiuc.edu) and the first on crops in the Midwest of North America, one of the major food production regions of the globe. Although increases in both aboveground net primary production (17–18%) and yield (15%) were consistent across three growing seasons and two cultivars, the relative stimulation was less than projected from previous chamber experiments. As in previous studies, partitioning to seed dry mass decreased; however, net production during vegetative growth did not increase and crop maturation was delayed, not accelerated as previously reported. These results suggest that chamber studies may have over‐estimated the stimulatory effect of rising [CO2], with important implications on global food supply forecasts.

[1]  F. Dohleman,et al.  Will photosynthesis of maize (Zea mays) in the US Corn Belt increase in future [CO2] rich atmospheres? An analysis of diurnal courses of CO2 uptake under free‐air concentration enrichment (FACE) , 2004 .

[2]  A. Rogers,et al.  Rising atmospheric carbon dioxide: plants FACE the future. , 2004, Annual review of plant biology.

[3]  A. Rogers,et al.  Iowa State University From the SelectedWorks of Emily Heaton April , 2004 Leaf photosynthesis and carbohydrate dynamics of soybeans grown throughout their life-cycle under Free-Air Carbon dioxide Enrichment , 2018 .

[4]  A. Rogers,et al.  Testing the “source–sink” hypothesis of down-regulation of photosynthesis in elevated [CO2] in the field with single gene substitutions in Glycine max , 2004 .

[5]  M. Parrya,et al.  Effects of climate change on global food production under SRES emissions and socio-economic scenarios , 2004 .

[6]  S. Long,et al.  Can photosynthesis respond to short-term fluctuations in atmospheric carbon dioxide? , 2004, Photosynthesis Research.

[7]  J. Holtum,et al.  Photosynthetic CO2 uptake in seedlings of two tropical tree species exposed to oscillating elevated concentrations of CO2 , 2003, Planta.

[8]  R. Cesar Izaurralde,et al.  Integrated assessment of Hadley Center (HadCM2) climate-change impacts on agricultural productivity and irrigation water supply in the conterminous United States: Part II. Regional agricultural production in 2030 and 2095 , 2003 .

[9]  Masumi Okada,et al.  Seasonal changes in the effects of elevated CO2 on rice at three levels of nitrogen supply: a free air CO2 enrichment (FACE) experiment , 2003 .

[10]  Peter S. Curtis,et al.  Plant reproduction under elevated CO2 conditions: a meta‐analysis of reports on 79 crop and wild species , 2002 .

[11]  P. Curtis,et al.  A meta‐analysis of elevated [CO2] effects on soybean (Glycine max) physiology, growth and yield , 2002 .

[12]  T. Carter,et al.  Phenotypic Diversity of Modern Chinese and North American Soybean Cultivars , 2001 .

[13]  R. Nelson,et al.  Molecular Genetic Analysis of U.S. and Chinese Soybean Ancestral Lines , 2001 .

[14]  F. Miglietta,et al.  Free‐air CO2 enrichment (FACE) of a poplar plantation: the POPFACE fumigation system , 2001 .

[15]  J. D. Hanson,et al.  Nitrogen and CO2 affect regrowth and biomass partitioning differently in forages of three functional groups , 2001 .

[16]  Robert J. Scholes,et al.  The Carbon Cycle and Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide , 2001 .

[17]  L. Ziska,et al.  Sensitivity of field-grown soybean to future atmospheric CO2: selection for improved productivity in the 21st century. , 2000 .

[18]  R C Littell,et al.  Mixed Models: Modelling Covariance Structure in the Analysis of Repeated Measures Data , 2005 .

[19]  R. Loomis Feeding a World Population of More than Eight Billion People: A Challenge to Science , 1999 .

[20]  S. Long,et al.  Free-air Carbon Dioxide Enrichment (FACE) in Global Change Research: A Review , 1999 .

[21]  Bryant,et al.  Acclimation of photosynthesis to elevated CO2 under low-nitrogen nutrition is affected by the capacity for assimilate utilization. Perennial ryegrass under free-Air CO2 enrichment , 1998, Plant physiology.

[22]  R C Littell,et al.  Statistical analysis of repeated measures data using SAS procedures. , 1998, Journal of animal science.

[23]  L. Ziska,et al.  Intraspecific variation in seed yield of soybean (Glycine max) in response to increased atmospheric carbon dioxide , 1998 .

[24]  A. Heagle,et al.  Influence of Ozone Stress on Soybean Response to Carbon Dioxide Enrichment: III. Yield and Seed Quality , 1998 .

[25]  A. Heagle,et al.  Influence of Ozone Stress on Soybean Response to Carbon Dioxide Enrichment: II. Biomass and Development , 1998 .

[26]  Peter S. Curtis,et al.  A meta-analysis of elevated CO2 effects on woody plant mass, form, and physiology , 1998, Oecologia.

[27]  Russell D. Wolfinger,et al.  A comparison of two approaches for selecting covariance structures in the analysis of repeated measurements , 1998 .

[28]  B. Drake,et al.  MORE EFFICIENT PLANTS: A Consequence of Rising Atmospheric CO2? , 1997, Annual review of plant physiology and plant molecular biology.

[29]  P. Pinter,et al.  Productivity and water use of wheat under free‐air CO2 enrichment , 1995 .

[30]  L. Ziska,et al.  Growth and photosynthetic response of three soybean cultivars to simultaneous increases in growth temperature and CO2 , 1995 .

[31]  H. Rogers,et al.  Soybean growth response to water supply and atmospheric carbon dioxide enrichment , 1995 .

[32]  C. Wood,et al.  Energy content, construction cost and phytomass accumulation of Glycine max (L.) Merr. and Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench grown in elevated CO2 in the field. , 1994, The New phytologist.

[33]  T. Carter,et al.  Genetic Base for North American Public Soybean Cultivars Released between 1947 and 1988 , 1994 .

[34]  W. Arp Effects of source‐sink relations on photosynthetic acclimation to elevated CO2 , 1991 .

[35]  B. Kimball Carbon Dioxide and Agricultural Yield: An Assemblage and Analysis of 430 Prior Observations1 , 1983 .

[36]  J. Hanway,et al.  How a soybean plant develops , 1967 .

[37]  J. Holtum,et al.  Photosynthetic CO 2 uptake in seedlings of two tropical tree species exposed to oscillating elevated concentrations of CO 2 , 2022 .