Motor adaptation as an optimal combination of computational strategies

To efficiently and accurately manipulate objects, the nervous system must adjust motor commands based on experience. Four major adaptive strategies that could help achieve this goal are: internal model formation of the environmental dynamics, minimizing force, trajectory planning, and selectively stiffening the arm. We measured motor adaptation to a robotic force field with and without a large background force requirement. We then developed a computational model of motor adaptation that allowed the relative contribution of the four strategies to be estimated. Motor adaptation was best modeled as a blend of strategies, with internal model formation playing a greater role when forces were smaller and predictable; impedance control had a higher priority when forces were smaller and unpredictable; force minimization was more important when forces were larger; and trajectory planning was involved in both large and small background force conditions. These results are consistent with the viewpoint that the nervous system effectively seeks to minimize a cost-function containing force, stiffness, and position error terms.

[1]  Y Uno,et al.  Quantitative examinations of internal representations for arm trajectory planning: minimum commanded torque change model. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  M. Kawato,et al.  Adaptation to Stable and Unstable Dynamics Achieved By Combined Impedance Control and Inverse Dynamics Model , 2003 .

[3]  David J. Ostry,et al.  Compensation for loads during arm movements using equilibrium-point control , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  R A Scheidt,et al.  Impedance control and internal model formation when reaching in a randomly varying dynamical environment. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation , 1984, 1984 American Control Conference.

[6]  R A Scheidt,et al.  Persistence of motor adaptation during constrained, multi-joint, arm movements. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  H. Gomi,et al.  Task-Dependent Viscoelasticity of Human Multijoint Arm and Its Spatial Characteristics for Interaction with Environments , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation: Part I—Theory , 1985 .

[9]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  Making smooth moves , 2022 .

[10]  Dan Nemet,et al.  Neuromotor noise limits motor performance, but not motor adaptation, in children. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  F A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.