ADAPTATION TO UNEXPECTED VARIATIONS OF AN INERTIAL LOAD IN GOAL DIRECTED MOVEMENTS

Abstract Human motor behavior has been studied experimentally in goal directed movements. At the movement onset the inertial load to be displaced was changed unexpectedly. The adaptation of movement and muscular activity have been described with a moving average model. Significant adaptation effects were demonstrated in the first two or three movements in the new condition. Adaptation only partly compensated the mass effects: A higher mass led to a persistent reduction of movement velocity. Amplitudes of muscular activity showed no adaptation of muscular effort, only activation durations were modified. Thus the hypothesis that adaptation pursues a certain movement trajectory as a function of time had to be rejected. However, after scaling towards peak velocity, a global shape invariance was demonstrated in the movement trajectory. In the first movements after a change of mass effective and substantial modifications of muscular activity appeared about 90 milliseconds after movement onset. Earlier modifications suggest a force feedback enlarging the disturbance. Such force feedback may however increase system bandwidth as it will allow increased position/velocity feedback gains.

[1]  L. Stark,et al.  Roles of the elements of the triphasic control signal , 1985, Experimental Neurology.

[2]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Visual control of reaching movements in man. , 1983, Advances in neurology.

[3]  C. Gielen,et al.  Relation between EMG activation patterns and kinematic properties of aimed arm movements. , 1985, Journal of motor behavior.

[4]  M. Latash,et al.  Organizing principles for single joint movements. III. Speed-insensitive strategy as a default. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  Henk G. Stassen,et al.  Internal representation, internal model, human performance model and mental workload , 1988, Autom..

[6]  T Vilis,et al.  Braking of fast and accurate elbow flexions in the monkey. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  M. Hallett,et al.  Ballistic flexion movements of the human thumb. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  R. Happee Goal-directed arm movements. II: A kinematic model and its relation to EMG records. , 1993, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[9]  L Stark,et al.  An analysis of the sources of musculoskeletal system impedance. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  Ruitenbeek Jc,et al.  Computer-controlled manipulator/display system for human-movement studies , 1984 .

[11]  Riender Happee,et al.  Goal-directed arm movements: I. Analysis of EMG records in shoulder and elbow muscles. , 1992, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[12]  J. C. Ruitenbeek Visual and proprioceptive information in goal directed movements: A system theoretical approach , 1985 .

[13]  Duane T. McRuer,et al.  A Review of Quasi-Linear Pilot Models , 1967 .

[14]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Invariant characteristics of a pointing movement in man , 1981, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[15]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Effects of applied vibration on triphasic electromyographic patterns in neurologically ballistic head movements , 1985, Experimental Neurology.

[16]  C. Gielen,et al.  Modification of muscle activation patterns during fast goal-directed arm movements. , 1984, Journal of motor behavior.

[17]  C. Marsden,et al.  The function of the antagonist muscle during fast limb movements in man. , 1983, The Journal of physiology.