Assessment of the effectiveness of Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) in the delivery of desired Ecosystem Services in Sasumua catchment, Kenya

Abstract. The study was conducted in Sasumua watershed in Nyandarua County, Kenya where a Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) pilot project was initiated in June 2015 with the aim of promoting sustainable land management practices (SLM) that would lead to improved water quality. This study which was conducted after one year of PES implementation, seeks to establish what effect the SLM technologies being promoted under PES would have on the water quality. A representative sub-watershed was established where 42.3 ha were under intensive cultivation. Baseline status on Total Suspended Solids (TSS) was established during the rainy season of March–May 2015 just before the onset of PES project. Baseline status on SLM technologies in the study site was also established. Two V-notches were installed to record flow in the rainy season of March–May 2016 for purposes of soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) calibration. Data collection involved water sampling at selected points during two major rainy seasons of October–December 2015 and March–May 2016. Water samples were tested for TSS by photometric determination method using Lovibond water quality testing kit. The SWAT model was applied to generate two scenarios (Worst and Best scenarios) of the study site. The scenarios before and after PES project (determined from actual field measurements) were fitted in between the SWAT scenarios to evaluate the effectiveness of the PES approach after one year of PES project. The baseline status for TSS was an average of 71.05 mg/L. After one year of PES project implementation, the TSS improved to an average of 42.73 mg/L. SWAT model predicts a worst scenario for TSS at an average of 124.15 mg/L and best scenario at an average of 12.76 mg/L. Watershed management through PES approach can be effective in improving downstream water quality as shown by increase in adoption of SLM technologies from 11 % to approximately 32 % within the first year. However, long term research data is highly recommended to validate the effectiveness of PES over number of years especially on ecosystem services that manifest after long periods and establishing whether PES incentives actually maintain best conditions at farm level. More ecosystem services should also be monitored to validate the TSS results.

[1]  C. Paniconi,et al.  Assessment of alternative land management practices using hydrological simulation and a decision support tool: Arborea agricultural region, Sardinia , 2007 .

[2]  Mark A. Nearing,et al.  PRACTICAL THRESHOLDS FOR SEPARATING EROSIVE AND NON–EROSIVE STORMS , 2002 .

[3]  Steven T. Bednarz,et al.  LARGE AREA HYDROLOGIC MODELING AND ASSESSMENT PART II: MODEL APPLICATION 1 , 1998 .

[4]  W. J. Gburek,et al.  Use of the SWAT Model to Quantify Water Quality Effects of Agricultural BMPs at the Farm-Scale Level , 2008 .

[5]  O. Kirui,et al.  Economics of Land Degradation and Improvement in Kenya , 2016 .

[6]  S. Pagiola Payments for Environmental Services in Costa Rica , 2008 .

[7]  Q. Mahmood,et al.  Water quality assessment of Siran river, Pakistan , 2011 .

[8]  Modeling of Agricultural BMP Scenarios in the Paw Paw River Watershed using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool ( SWAT ) , 2008 .

[9]  Millenium Ecosystem Assessment Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis , 2005 .

[10]  Mazdak Arabi,et al.  Modeling long-term water quality impact of structural BMPs , 2006 .

[11]  A. Smith,et al.  Soil Science , 1965, Nature.

[12]  P. Ina,et al.  Monitoring payments for watershed services schemes in developing countries , 2013 .

[13]  Financial sustainability for environmental services : rural development in microwatersheds Rio Rural , Brazil Case studies on Remuneration of Positive Externalities ( RPE ) / Payments for Environmental Services ( PES ) , 2013 .

[14]  N. McCarthy,et al.  Climate-smart agriculture: a synthesis of empirical evidence of food security and mitigation benefits from improved cropland management , 2011 .

[15]  Food Security Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) , 2004 .

[16]  S. Postel,et al.  Watershed protection: Capturing the benefits of nature's water supply services , 2005 .

[17]  S. Wunder Payments for environmental services : Some nuts and bolts , 2022 .

[18]  Adrian Martin,et al.  Measuring effectiveness, efficiency and equity in an experimental Payments for Ecosystem Services trial , 2014, Global environmental change : human and policy dimensions.

[19]  J. Schneekloth Measurement of Soil Moisture , 2005 .

[20]  Stefano Pagiola,et al.  Selling Forest Environmental Services : Market-Based Mechanisms for Conservation and Development , 2002 .

[21]  E. Nkonya,et al.  On-site and off-Site long-term economic impacts of soil fertility management practices: The case of maize-based cropping systems in Kenya , 2008 .

[22]  J. Mwangi,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF THE WATER QUALITY STATUS OF SASUMUA WATERSHED, KENYA , 2012 .

[23]  M. N. Jairo Effects of climate and weather variability on sustainable land management, crop biodiversity and poverty in Kenya , 2013 .

[24]  Y. Clough,et al.  On the relationship between farmland biodiversity and land-use intensity in Europe , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  E. Molua Climate Change Perception and Farmers' Adoption of Sustainable Land Management for Robust Adaptation in Cameroon , 2014 .

[26]  James C. Ascough,et al.  ROOT ZONE WATER QUALITY MODEL SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS USING MONTE CARLO SIMULATION , 2000 .

[27]  J M Gathenya,et al.  A modeling approach to evaluate the impact of conservation practices on water and sediment yield in Sasumua Watershed, Kenya , 2015, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[28]  Zoe Douglas,et al.  Conservation and environment , 2006 .

[29]  Z. Adimassu,et al.  EFFECT OF SOIL BUNDS ON RUNOFF, SOIL AND NUTRIENT LOSSES, AND CROP YIELD IN THE CENTRAL HIGHLANDS OF ETHIOPIA , 2014 .

[30]  J. Hardner,et al.  Rethinking green consumerism. , 2002, Scientific American.

[31]  João Rocha,et al.  Soil and Water Assessment Tool "SWAT" , 2008, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[32]  L. Couldrick,et al.  Payments for ecosystem services: A best practice guide , 2013 .

[33]  E. Kihiu Pastoral Practices, Economics, and Institutions of Sustainable Rangeland Management in Kenya , 2016 .

[34]  G. Boody An Assessment of Performance-Based Indicators and Payments for Resources Conservation on Agricultural Lands , 2007 .

[35]  Hanna Sterve Factors restricting adoption of sustainable agricultural practices in a smallholder agro-ecosystem : A case study of Potshini community, upper Thukela region, South Africa , 2011 .

[36]  S. Wunder,et al.  Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues , 2008 .

[37]  N. Carroll,et al.  Gaining depth: state of watershed investment 2014 , 2014 .

[38]  H. Liniger,et al.  Sustainable land management in practice: guidelines and best practices for Sub-Saharan Africa , 2011 .

[39]  B. Aylward Land use, hydrological function and economic valuation. , 2005 .