Cross-Communicability: Evaluating the Meta-communication of Cross-Platform Applications

Evaluating cross-platform systems is challenging due to the different constraints and capabilities of each platform. In this paper we extend the Semiotic Inspection Method (SIM), a Semiotic Engineering evaluation method, to evaluate cross-platform systems. We introduce the term cross-communicability to denote the quality of the meta-communication of the system as whole, taking into account the user traversal between the different platforms. To assess cross-communicability, we describe a novel approach to conduct the SIM, which introduces a contrastive analysis of the designer-to-user meta-communication messages of each platform, based on a semiotic framing of design changes initially proposed for End-User Development. The results from an analytical study indicate that this approach is capable of identifying and classifying several potential communication breakdowns particular to cross-platform systems, which in turn can inform the design or redesign of a cross-platform application.

[1]  Laurent Karsenty,et al.  Inter‐Usability of Multi‐Device Systems – A Conceptual Framework , 2005 .

[2]  Charles S. Peirce,et al.  The essential Peirce , 1992 .

[3]  Dominique L. Scapin,et al.  How assessing plasticity design choices can improve UI quality: a case study , 2010, EICS '10.

[4]  Simone D. J. Barbosa,et al.  Design da interação humano-computador com MoLIC , 2014, IHC.

[5]  James A. Landay,et al.  Employing patterns and layers for early-stage design and prototyping of cross-device user interfaces , 2008, CHI.

[6]  Ahmed Seffah,et al.  Multiple user interfaces : cross-platform applications and context-aware interfaces , 2005 .

[7]  Fabio Paternò,et al.  On-demand cross-device interface components migration , 2010, Mobile HCI.

[8]  Clarisse Sieckenius de Souza,et al.  The semiotic inspection method , 2006, IHC '06.

[9]  P. Agre.  Lucy A. Suchman, Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Commuinication (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1987) , 1990, Artif. Intell..

[10]  Marco Winckler,et al.  Human-Computer Interaction - INTERACT 2011 - 13th IFIP TC 13 International Conference, Lisbon, Portugal, September 5-9, 2011, Proceedings, Part III , 2011, INTERACT.

[11]  Simone Diniz Junqueira Barbosa,et al.  Methods and tools: a method for evaluating the communicability of user interfaces , 2000, INTR.

[12]  Simone Diniz Junqueira Barbosa,et al.  A Semiotic Framing for End-User Development , 2006, End User Development.

[13]  Jean Vanderdonckt,et al.  Graceful degradation of user interfaces as a design method for multiplatform systems , 2004, IUI '04.

[14]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Heuristic Evaluation of Prototypes (individual) , 2022 .

[15]  Harri Oinas-Kukkonen,et al.  Cross-platform service user experience: a field study and an initial framework , 2010, Mobile HCI.

[16]  George W. Stickel,et al.  The Essential Peirce: Vol 2 , 1999 .

[17]  Ahmed Seffah,et al.  Multi-devices "Multiple" user interfaces: development models and research opportunities , 2004, J. Syst. Softw..

[18]  Clarisse Sieckenius de Souza,et al.  The Semiotic Engineering of Human-Computer Interaction , 2005 .

[19]  Fabio Paternò,et al.  Desktop-to-Mobile Web Adaptation through Customizable Two-Dimensional Semantic Redesign , 2010, HCSE.

[20]  Lucy Suchman.  Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication , 1987 .

[21]  Philippe A. Palanque,et al.  Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2007 , 2007, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[22]  Clarisse Sieckenius de Souza,et al.  Can inspection methods generate valid new knowledge in HCI? The case of semiotic inspection , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[23]  Cathleen Wharton,et al.  The cognitive walkthrough method: a practitioner's guide , 1994 .

[24]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability inspection methods , 1994, CHI 95 Conference Companion.

[25]  Fabio Paternò.  Designing Multi-device User Interfaces: How to Adapt to the Changing Device , 2007, INTERACT.

[26]  Ville Antila,et al.  Challenges in Designing Inter-usable Systems , 2011, INTERACT.