Flexibility in Manufacturing and Activity Based Costing: Modelling the Interrelationships

Theory claims that ABC is most suitable for companies employing flexibility in manufacturing, as it is a vehicle for more accurately depicting cost causation when the level of overheads increases. Furthermore, the benefits of flexibility in production can only be visible when sophisticated cost accounting systems, such as ABC, are implemented. However, previous empirical studies have shown that this is not always the case. In this paper we develop a model, which proposes whether ABC implementation should be recommended by combining several attributes that, according to theory and previous empirical findings, characterize sophisticated cost accounting systems and flexibility in production. This model can be used to assist companies to assess the suitability and applicability of ABC, under their own specific business conditions regarding production flexibility. In order to evaluate the reliability of the model we have empirically tested it to a sample of leading Greek manufacturing firms. The model developed succeeded in identifying, at a statistically significant level, the perceptions of managers about the suitability of ABC for their companies. It also revealed that production flexibility is a significant factor driving companies towards ABC adoption.

[1]  Kathryn E. Stecke,et al.  Classification of flexible manufacturing systems , 2011 .

[2]  F. Frank Chen,et al.  Activity‐based approach to justification of advanced factory management systems , 1996 .

[3]  Robin,et al.  Profit priorities from activity based costing , 1991 .

[4]  R. Kaplan.  Measuring manufacturing performance: a new challenge for managerial accounting research , 1983 .

[5]  Suresh P. Sethi,et al.  Flexibility in manufacturing: A survey , 1990 .

[6]  Falconer Mitchell,et al.  The development of activity-based costing journal literature, 1987-2000 , 2002 .

[7]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Activity-based Systems: Measuring the Costs of Resource Usage , 1992 .

[8]  Markus Granlund,et al.  Cost accounting in Finland: current practice and trends of development , 1996 .

[9]  Trond Bjørnenak.  Diffusion and accounting: the case of ABC in Norway , 1997 .

[10]  Kevin T. Stevens,et al.  ACTIVITY-BASED COSTING IN IRELAND: BARRIERS TO, AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR, CHANGE , 1999 .

[11]  Falconer Mitchell,et al.  Activity-Based Costing: Problems in Practice , 1993 .

[12]  A. Friedman,et al.  Success and Failure of Activity-Based Techniques: A Long-term Perspective , 2000 .

[13]  George Foster,et al.  Measuring the success of activity-based cost management and its determinants , 1997 .

[14]  Anne M. Lillis,et al.  The impact of manufacturing flexibility on management control system design , 1995 .

[15]  Thomas H. Johnson,et al.  Relevance Lost: The Rise and Fall of Management Accounting , 1987 .

[16]  Teemu Malmi,et al.  Activity-based costing diffusion across organizations: an exploratory empirical analysis of Finnish firms , 1999 .

[17]  David Dugdale,et al.  Investment in Advanced Manufacturing Technology: A Study of Practice in Large UK Companies , 1998 .

[18]  Mike Tayles,et al.  Product costing in UK manufacturing organizations , 1994 .

[19]  Falconer Mitchell,et al.  Activity-based costing in the U.K.’s largest companies: a comparison of 1994 and 1999 survey results , 2000 .

[20]  Stephen T. Parkinson,et al.  The Adoption of Flexible Manufacturing Systems in British and German Companies , 1986 .

[21]  Carsten Rohde,et al.  Management Accounting in Denmark; Theory and Practice , 1996 .

[22]  Robert J. Vokurka,et al.  A review of empirical research on manufacturing flexibility , 2000 .

[23]  Sten Jönsson,et al.  Cost Management in Sweden: From Modern to Post Modern , 1996 .

[24]  Toni M. Somers,et al.  The measurement of manufacturing flexibility , 1992 .

[25]  Derrick E. D'Souza,et al.  Toward a taxonomy of manufacturing flexibility dimensions , 2000 .

[26]  Thomas Schrefl,et al.  Activity-based costing & management , 2007 .

[27]  Annie S. McGowan,et al.  Satisfaction with activity-based cost management implementation , 1997 .

[28]  K. Langfield-Smith,et al.  Adoption and benefits of management accounting practices: an Australian study , 1998 .

[29]  J. Hurley.  Cost and effect , 2001 .

[30]  Shannon W. Anderson,et al.  The impact of contextual and process factors on the evaluation of activity-based costing systems , 1999 .

[31]  Tamás Koltai,et al.  A flexible costing system for flexible manufacturing systems using activity based costing , 2000 .

[32]  David Upton,et al.  Flexibility as process mobility: The management of plant capabilities for quick response manufacturing , 1995 .

[33]  T. Somers,et al.  BUSINESS STRATEGY, MANUFACTURING FLEXIBILITY, AND ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE RELATIONSHIPS: A PATH ANALYSIS APPROACH , 1996 .

[34]  M. Bromwich,et al.  Activity Based Costing Systems and Incremental Costs , 1999 .

[35]  T. Groot.  Activity-based Costing in U.S. and Dutch Food Companies , 1999 .

[36]  Charles H. Fine,et al.  An Empirical Study of Flexibility in Manufacturing , 1995 .

[37]  Lin Fitzgerald,et al.  The involvement of management accountants in operational process change , 2002 .

[38]  Yash P. Gupta,et al.  Flexibility of manufacturing systems: Concepts and measurements , 1989 .

[39]  Maurice Gosselin.  The effect of strategy and organizational structure on the adoption and implementation of activity-based costing , 1997 .

[40]  D. Gerwin.  Manufacturing flexibility: a strategic perspective , 1993 .

[41]  John A. Sharp,et al.  A review of manufacturing flexibility , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[42]  Falconer Mitchell,et al.  A survey of activity-based costing in the U.K.'s largest companies , 1995 .