The attentional blink and task switching within and across modalities

The attentional blink (AB) is a robust deficit obtained for a second visual target (T2) appearing within 200 600 ms of a correctly identified first target (T1). In most AB studies both targets appear among distractors in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP), and a key variable is the lag or SOA between the two targets. In the present chapter we review research bearing on the basis for the AB deficit and related deficits, including cross-modal versions of the AB procedure and tasks that require a task switch (a switch in target criterion) between T1 and T2. We conclude that the standard AB deficit is restricted to visual targets and can be distinguished from an additional deficit that results from a task switch between T1 and T2. The latter effect is found with cross-modal and auditory stimuli as well as visual stimuli, and is additive with the AB effect (when both targets are visual). We propose that the standard AB effect occurs at a different stage of processing than the more central taskswitching deficit and shows features that distinguish it from the latter. The visual AB effect represents a limit in the speed with which visual targets — which are vulnerable to masking — can be consolidated into working memory or awareness: A second target may be lost while queuing for access to the consolidation process. We review studies that show a clear dissociation between AB and task-switching deficits, consistent with complementary findings of Allport and Hsieh (this volume) on criterion shifting in RSVP target search. The evidence suggests that there are multiple bottlenecks in processing which individually or together limit performance when two target stimuli must be processed close in time.

[1]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Chronometric Evidence for Central Postponement in Temporally Overlapping Tasks , 2003 .

[2]  M. Chun,et al.  The influence of temporal selection on spatial selection and distractor interference: an attentional blink study. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  K L Shapiro,et al.  Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? . , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  M. Potter,et al.  A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  H Pashler,et al.  Processing stages in overlapping tasks: evidence for a central bottleneck. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  M. Potter Short-term conceptual memory for pictures. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[7]  K. Arnell,et al.  The attentional blink across stimulus modalities: Evidence for central processing limitations. , 1999 .

[8]  N. Meiran Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. , 1996 .

[9]  H. Egeth,et al.  Beyond similarity: Masking of the target is sufficient to cause the attentional blink , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  Kimron Shapiro,et al.  Direct measurement of attentional dwell time in human vision , 1994, Nature.

[11]  W. Maki,et al.  Associative priming by targets and distractors during rapid serial visual presentation: does word meaning survive the attentional blink? , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  H. Pashler Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  S. Monsell,et al.  Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. , 1995 .

[14]  I. Biederman,et al.  Mental set and mental shift revisited , 1976 .

[15]  D. Alan Allport,et al.  SHIFTING INTENTIONAL SET - EXPLORING THE DYNAMIC CONTROL OF TASKS , 1994 .

[16]  J. Duncan,et al.  The Slow Time-Course of Visual Attention , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  H. Egeth,et al.  Are attentional dwell times inconsistent with serial visual search? , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[18]  P. Jolicoeur Modulation of the attentional blink by on-line response selection: Evidence from speeded and unspeeded Task1 decisions , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[19]  J. Enns,et al.  Object Substitution: A New Form of Masking in Unattended Visual Locations , 1997 .

[20]  J. Duncan The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli. , 1980, Psychological review.

[21]  M. Potter Meaning in visual search. , 1975, Science.

[22]  P. Jolicoeur Restricted attentional capacity between sensory modalities , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[23]  J. Deutsch Perception and Communication , 1958, Nature.

[24]  D. Broadbent,et al.  From detection to identification: Response to multiple targets in rapid serial visual presentation , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  Arnulf Remole,et al.  VISUAL MASKING: AN INTEGRATIVE APPROACH , 1985 .

[26]  E. Vogel,et al.  Word meanings can be accessed but not reported during the attentional blink , 1996, Nature.

[27]  V. Lollo,et al.  Low-level masking in the attentional blink , 1997 .

[28]  J. Driver,et al.  Priming from the Attentional Blink: A Failure to Extract Visual Tokens but Not Visual Types , 1997 .

[29]  J. Deutsch,et al.  Attention: Some theoretical considerations. , 1963 .

[30]  K. Shapiro,et al.  Temporal allocation of visual attention: Inhibition or interference? , 1994 .

[31]  V. Lollo,et al.  Beyond the attentional blink: visual masking by object substitution. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  Alan Allport,et al.  Task-switching: using RSVP methods to study an experimenter-cued shift of set , 2001 .

[33]  M. Chun Temporal binding errors are redistributed by the attentional blink , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  M. Potter Very short-term conceptual memory , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[35]  G. Sperling,et al.  Dynamics of automatic and controlled visual attention. , 1987, Science.

[36]  Karen M. Arnell,et al.  Attention to visual pattern information produces the attentional blink in rapid serial visual presentation. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  Walter F. Bischof,et al.  Attentional switching in spatial and nonspatial domains : Evidence from the attentional blink , 1999 .

[38]  K L Shapiro,et al.  Similarity determines the attentional blink. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[39]  M. Chun,et al.  Types and tokens in visual processing: a double dissociation between the attentional blink and repetition blindness. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  R. Dell’Acqua,et al.  The Demonstration of Short-Term Consolidation , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[41]  George Sperling,et al.  The information available in brief visual presentations. , 1960 .

[42]  W S Maki,et al.  Sources of the attentional blink during rapid serial visual presentation: perceptual interference and retrieval competition. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[43]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Attentional requirements in a ‘preattentive’ feature search task , 1997, Nature.