Reynolds Number Effects at High Angles of Attack

Lessons learned from comparisons between ground-based tests and flight measurements for the high-angle-of-attack programs on the F-18 High Alpha Research Vehicle (HARV), the X-29 forward-swept wing aircraft, and the X-31 enhanced fighter maneuverability aircraft are presented. On all three vehicles, Reynolds number effects were evident on the forebodies at high angles of attack. The correlation between flight and wind tunnel forebody pressure distributions for the F-18 HARV were improved by using twin longitudinal grit strips on the forebody of the wind-tunnel model. Pressure distributions obtained on the X-29 wind-tunnel model at flight Reynolds numbers showed excellent correlation with the flight data up to alpha = 50 deg. Above (alpha = 50 deg. the pressure distributions for both flight and wind tunnel became asymmetric and showed poorer agreement, possibly because of the different surface finish of the model and aircraft. The detrimental effect of a very sharp nose apex was demonstrated on the X-31 aircraft. Grit strips on the forebody of the X-31 reduced the randomness but increased the magnitude of the asymmetry. Nose strakes were required to reduce the forebody yawing moment asymmetries and the grit strips on the flight test noseboom improved the aircraft handling qualities.

[1]  Robert M. Hall,et al.  Influence of Reynolds number on forebody side forces for 3.5-diameter tangent-ogive bodies , 1987 .

[2]  Gary E. Erickson.  Wind tunnel investigation of vortex flows on F/A-18 configuration at subsonic through transonic speed , 1991 .

[3]  James C. Ross,et al.  High Alpha Technology Program (HATP) ground test to flight comparisons , 1994 .

[4]  David F. Fisher,et al.  Controlling forebody asymmetries in flight: Experience with boundary layer transition strips , 1994 .

[5]  David F. Fisher,et al.  Effect of Actuated Forebody Strakes on the Forebody Aerodynamics of the NASA F-18 HARV , 1996 .

[6]  G. T. Chapman,et al.  Side forces on a tangent ogive forebody with a fineness ratio of 3.5 at high angles of attack and Mach numbers from 0.1 to 0.7 , 1977 .

[7]  Mark A. Croom,et al.  Comparison of X-31 flight, wind-tunnel, and water-tunnel yawing moment asymmetries at high angles of attack , 1994 .

[8]  Brent R. Cobleigh.  High-angle-of-attack yawing moment asymmetry of the X-31 aircraft from flight test , 1994 .

[9]  Brian L. Hunt,et al.  Asymmetric vortex forces and wakes on slen-der bodies , 1982 .

[10]  David M. Richwine,et al.  Correlation of forebody pressures and aircraft yawing moments on the X-29A aircraft at high angles of attack , 1992 .

[11]  E. R. Keener,et al.  Flow-separation patterns on symmetric forebodies , 1986 .

[12]  Peter C Carr,et al.  Effects of Fuselage Forebody Geometry on Low-Speed Lateral-Directional Characteristics of Twin-Tail Fighter Model at High Angles of Attack. , 1979 .

[13]  Daniel W. Banks,et al.  F-18 high alpha research vehicle surface pressures: Initial in-flight results and correlation with flow visualization and wind-tunnel data , 1990 .

[14]  P. J. Lamont,et al.  AIAA 80-1556R Pressures Around an Inclined Ogive Cylinder with Laminar, Transitional, or Turbulent Separation , 2022 .

[15]  John H. Del Frate,et al.  In-flight flow field analysis on the NASA F-18 high alpha research vehicle with comparisons to ground facility data , 1990 .

[16]  Sue B. Grafton,et al.  The F/A-18 High-Angle-of- Attack Ground-to-Flight Correlation: Lessons Learned , 1997 .

[17]  Mark A. Croom,et al.  Dynamic model testing of the X-31 configuration for high-angle-of-attack flight dynamics research , 1993 .