Paired comparison for subjective multimedia quality assessment: Theory and practice

For subjective multimedia quality assessment, paired comparison has been used less frequently than other methodologies such as single stimulus and double stimulus methodologies, mainly due to its increased time complexity. However, it has been shown that paired comparison provides improved discriminability between stimuli, which consequently improves reliability of the test results. Analyzing comparison results involves several challenges in quality score computation, outlier detection, etc. This paper presents theoretical backgrounds on these challenges and use cases where paired comparison are successfully applied. In particular, the issue of the increased time complexity is discussed along with recently proposed solutions.

[1]  Touradj Ebrahimi,et al.  Subjective Quality Evaluation via Paired Comparison: Application to Scalable Video Coding , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[2]  R. Davidson On Extending the Bradley-Terry Model to Accommodate Ties in Paired Comparison Experiments , 1970 .

[3]  Maya R. Gupta,et al.  How to Analyze Paired Comparison Data , 2011 .

[4]  Qingming Huang,et al.  HodgeRank on Random Graphs for Subjective Video Quality Assessment , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[5]  P. V. Rao,et al.  Ties in Paired-Comparison Experiments: A Generalization of the Bradley-Terry Model , 1967 .

[6]  M. Glickman Parameter Estimation in Large Dynamic Paired Comparison Experiments , 1999 .

[7]  Luis von Ahn,et al.  Matchin: eliciting user preferences with an online game , 2009, CHI.

[8]  John C. Handley,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Bradley-Terry and Thurstone-Mosteller Paired Comparison Models for Image Quality Assessment , 2001, PICS.

[9]  L. Thurstone A law of comparative judgment. , 1994 .

[10]  R. A. Bradley,et al.  Rank Analysis of Incomplete Block Designs: I. The Method of Paired Comparisons , 1952 .

[11]  Marcus Barkowsky,et al.  Analysis and improvement of a paired comparison method in the application of 3DTV subjective experiment , 2012, 2012 19th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[12]  Touradj Ebrahimi,et al.  Paired comparison-based subjective quality assessment of stereoscopic images , 2013, Multimedia Tools and Applications.

[13]  Ragnhild Eg,et al.  Randomised pair comparison: an economic and robust method for audiovisual quality assessment , 2010, NOSSDAV.

[14]  Chin-Laung Lei,et al.  Quadrant of euphoria: a crowdsourcing platform for QoE assessment , 2010, IEEE Network.

[15]  Olga Sorkine-Hornung,et al.  A comparative study of image retargeting , 2010, ACM Trans. Graph..