Privacy-centred data-driven innovation in the smart city. Exemplary use case of traffic counting

ABSTRACT As urban areas around the world seek to transform themselves into smart cities, new technologies are being interwoven into the urban fabric that surrounds us. This process is often technology-driven and revolves around issues of quantification, cost reduction, and efficiency. This perspective is increasingly being challenged by more inclusive perspectives that seek to empower civil society and which focus on its needs and demands. A major concern with smart city technologies in public spaces is the lack of protection for individual privacy as a result of surveillance. In this paper, we have chosen the use case of traffic counting as an example to illustrate how the use of advanced technologies and integrated planning strategies can shift the balance between administrative and business interests on the one hand, and privacy concerns on the other, towards a privacy-centric approach. We propose a privacy-centric planning and development approach for smart city technologies. Through our use case, we demonstrate a privacy-centric participatory development process that led to a prototypical technical solution for privacy-friendly and human-centric traffic counting. We conclude this paper by deriving suggestions for more privacy-friendly smart city development processes from our specific use case.

[1]  Agusti Solanas,et al.  The pursuit of citizens' privacy: a privacy-aware smart city is possible , 2013, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[2]  Fei Liu,et al.  A video-based real-time adaptive vehicle-counting system for urban roads , 2017, PloS one.

[3]  Liesbet van Zoonen,et al.  Privacy concerns in smart cities , 2016, Gov. Inf. Q..

[4]  Meikang Qiu,et al.  Privacy Protection for Preventing Data Over-Collection in Smart City , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[5]  Lei Cui,et al.  Security and Privacy in Smart Cities: Challenges and Opportunities , 2018, IEEE Access.

[6]  Ding Wang,et al.  Where’s Wally? In Search of Citizen Perspectives on the Smart City , 2016 .

[7]  Zbigniew Smoreda,et al.  Unravelling daily human mobility motifs , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[8]  Ali Farhadi,et al.  YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvement , 2018, ArXiv.

[9]  Xuanzhe Liu,et al.  Approximate Query Processing on Autonomous Cameras , 2019, ArXiv.

[10]  George K. Thiruvathukal,et al.  Large-Scale Object Detection of Images from Network Cameras in Variable Ambient Lighting Conditions , 2018, 2019 IEEE Conference on Multimedia Information Processing and Retrieval (MIPR).

[11]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Understanding individual human mobility patterns , 2008, Nature.

[12]  Jihane Tadili,et al.  Citizen participation in smart cities: a survey , 2019, SCA.

[13]  Isabel Wagner,et al.  Privacy in the Smart City—Applications, Technologies, Challenges, and Solutions , 2018, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[14]  César A. Hidalgo,et al.  Unique in the Crowd: The privacy bounds of human mobility , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[15]  David C. Anastasiu,et al.  The NVIDIA AI City Challenge , 2017, 2017 IEEE SmartWorld, Ubiquitous Intelligence & Computing, Advanced & Trusted Computed, Scalable Computing & Communications, Cloud & Big Data Computing, Internet of People and Smart City Innovation (SmartWorld/SCALCOM/UIC/ATC/CBDCom/IOP/SCI).

[16]  Hug March,et al.  Smart contradictions: The politics of making Barcelona a Self-sufficient city , 2016 .

[17]  Devajyoti Deka,et al.  Social and Environmental Justice Issues in Urban Transportation , 2004 .

[18]  Un-Habitat,et al.  neW URBAn AGendA , 2016 .

[19]  Anthony Townsend,et al.  Smart Cities: Big Data, Civic Hackers, and the Quest for a New Utopia , 2013 .

[20]  Jiska Engelbert,et al.  Excluding citizens from the European smart city: The discourse practices of pursuing and granting smartness , 2019, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[21]  Xu Liu,et al.  Highway Vehicle Counting in Compressed Domain , 2016, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[22]  Victor R. Prybutok,et al.  Factors that determine residents’ acceptance of smart city technologies , 2020, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[23]  Mark Gaved,et al.  A Citizen-Centred Approach to Education in the Smart City: Incidental Language Learning for Supporting the Inclusion of Recent Migrants , 2012, Int. J. Digit. Lit. Digit. Competence.

[24]  COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS , 2008 .

[25]  Shiquan Wang,et al.  Object Detection and Counting with Low Quality Videos , 2016 .

[26]  Marius Rohde Johannessen,et al.  The Role of Citizen Participation in Municipal Smart City Projects: Lessons Learned from Norway , 2016 .

[27]  Ben Green The Smart Enough City , 2019 .

[28]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions , 2011, dg.o '11.

[29]  Tobias Senst,et al.  Extending IOU Based Multi-Object Tracking by Visual Information , 2018, 2018 15th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance (AVSS).

[30]  R. Kitchin,et al.  The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism , 2013, GeoJournal.

[31]  Zhen Tu,et al.  A New Privacy Breach: User Trajectory Recovery From Aggregated Mobility Data , 2018, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.