Don't words come easy? A psychophysical exploration of word superiority
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Isabel Gauthier,et al. A visual short-term memory advantage for objects of expertise. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[2] W. Prinzmetal. The word-superiority effect does not require a T-scope , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.
[3] S. Dehaene,et al. Language-specific tuning of visual cortex? Functional properties of the Visual Word Form Area. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[4] Alexander P. Leff,et al. Too Little, Too Late: Reduced Visual Span and Speed Characterize Pure Alexia , 2009, Cerebral cortex.
[5] James S. Adelman,et al. Visual word recognition, volume 1 : models and methods, orthography and phonology , 2012 .
[6] Christian Gerlach,et al. Visual processing in pure alexia: A case study , 2010, Cortex.
[7] A. Meyers. Reading , 1999, Language Teaching.
[8] S. Dehaene,et al. The unique role of the visual word form area in reading , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[9] John Duncan,et al. Attentional functions of parietal and frontal cortex. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.
[10] C. Bundesen,et al. A neural theory of visual attention: bridging cognition and neurophysiology. , 2005, Psychological review.
[11] M. Carrasco,et al. The eccentricity effect: Target eccentricity affects performance on conjunction searches , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.
[12] P. Cavanagh,et al. The Capacity of Visual Short-Term Memory is Set Both by Visual Information Load and by Number of Objects , 2004, Psychological science.
[13] George Sperling,et al. The information available in brief visual presentations. , 1960 .
[14] S Lehéricy,et al. The visual word form area: spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[15] Stanislas Dehaene,et al. Reading normal and degraded words: Contribution of the dorsal and ventral visual pathways , 2008, NeuroImage.
[16] Charles W. Eriksen,et al. Retinal locus and acuity in visual information processing , 1977 .
[17] T. R. Jordan,et al. What do lateralized displays tell us about visual word perception? A cautionary indication from the word-letter effect , 2004, Neuropsychologia.
[18] Timothy R. Jordan,et al. Word superiority over isolated letters: The neglected case of forward masking , 1994, Memory & cognition.
[19] J. Grainger,et al. Does the huamn mnid raed wrods as a wlohe? , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[20] Jonathan Grainger,et al. The front end of visual word recognition , 2012 .
[21] Timothy R. Jordan,et al. Word Superiority Over Isolated Letters: The Neglected Role of Flanking Mask Contours , 1993 .
[22] D. Plaut,et al. A LITERATURE REVIEW AND NEW DATA SUPPORTING AN INTERACTIVE ACCOUNT OF LETTER-BY-LETTER READING. , 1998, Cognitive neuropsychology.
[23] Isabel Gauthier,et al. Letter processing in the visual system: Different activation patterns for single letters and strings , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.
[24] James L. McClelland,et al. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .
[25] Denis G. Pelli,et al. The remarkable inefficiency of word recognition , 2003, Nature.
[26] Claus Bundesen,et al. Generalizing parametric models by introducing trial-by-trial parameter variability: The case of TVA , 2011 .
[27] Guinevere F. Eden,et al. Attention to single letters activates left extrastriate cortex , 2004, NeuroImage.
[28] Mariano Sigman,et al. Hierarchical Coding of Letter Strings in the Ventral Stream: Dissecting the Inner Organization of the Visual Word-Form System , 2007, Neuron.
[29] C. Price,et al. The Interactive Account of ventral occipitotemporal contributions to reading , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[30] Word-superiority in pure alexia , 2013 .
[31] J. Vanrie,et al. Effects of spatial separation between stimuli in whole report from brief visual displays , 2007, Perception & psychophysics.
[32] D. D. Wheeler. Processes in word recognition , 1970 .
[33] M Coltheart,et al. DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. , 2001, Psychological review.
[34] G. A. Miller. THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .
[35] G. M. Reicher. Perceptual recognition as a function of meaninfulness of stimulus material. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.
[36] Claus Bundesen,et al. Prompt but inefficient: nicotine differentially modulates discrete components of attention , 2011, Psychopharmacology.
[37] J. M. Cattell. THE TIME TAKEN UP BY CEREBRAL OPERATIONS , 1886 .
[38] M. Sullivan,et al. Too little, too late. , 1999, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[39] James L. McClelland,et al. The role of familiar units in perception of words and nonwords , 1977 .
[40] C. Bundesen. A theory of visual attention. , 1990, Psychological review.
[41] H. I. S. Thirlaway,et al. Too little, too late , 1976, Nature.
[42] James L. McClelland,et al. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: part 1.: an account of basic findings , 1988 .