Temporal Trends in Disease Severity and Predicted Surgical Risk at the Time of Referral for Echocardiography in Patients Diagnosed with Aortic Stenosis.

BACKGROUND Calcific aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common underlying pathology in patients undergoing heart valve surgery, with an expected increasing prevalence among the aging population. METHODS AND RESULTS We identified the temporal trends in referral patterns, disease severity, and associated surgical risk among patients with AS between January 1, 1995 and December 31, 2012 at the Duke University Hospital. A total of 6103 patients had a finding of mild (n = 3303), moderate (n = 1648), or severe AS (n = 1152) in a native aortic valve. Overall presence of severe AS increased significantly over time (P = 0.009) with the most substantial increase occurring from 2010 and onward. Median age upon referral (P < 0.001) and attendant predicted surgical risk (P < 0.001) increased significantly in the observation period among patients with a finding of severe AS. Among patients with a finding of severe AS, the proportion of patients aged older than 80 years increased to 51.0% in the most recent time period (2010-2012) compared with 32.6% in the preceding time period (P < 0.001 for overall time trend). Similarly, the proportion of patients with a logistic EuroSCORE greater than 20% increased to 21.3% (2010-2012) from 12.1% (pre-2010). CONCLUSIONS Among patients referred for echocardiography to a high-volume tertiary hospital center, a significant increase in the prevalence of severe AS was observed over time. This trend occurred in parallel with increasing age and predicted surgical risk at referral. Health-care resource planning should account for an increasing number of patients in need of high-risk aortic valve replacements in the near future.

[1]  J. Gardin,et al.  Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study , 2006, The Lancet.

[2]  Sean M. O'Brien,et al.  Long-Term Survival After Aortic Valve Replacement Among High-Risk Elderly Patients in the United States: Insights From the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database, 1991 to 2007 , 2012, Circulation.

[3]  Sean M. O'Brien,et al.  Isolated aortic valve replacement in North America comprising 108,687 patients in 10 years: changes in risks, valve types, and outcomes in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database. , 2009, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[4]  S. Nashef,et al.  The logistic EuroSCORE , 2003 .

[5]  Sean M. O'Brien,et al.  The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 2--isolated valve surgery. , 2009, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[6]  D. Owens,et al.  Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Nonsurgical Candidates With Severe, Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis , 2013, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[7]  A. Bogers,et al.  Aortic stenosis in the elderly: disease prevalence and number of candidates for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis and modeling study. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  R. Bonow,et al.  Five-year clinical and economic outcomes among patients with medically managed severe aortic stenosis: results from a Medicare claims analysis. , 2011, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[9]  A. Leguerrier,et al.  Aortic valve replacement in the elderly: the real life. , 2012, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[10]  A. Cribier,et al.  Performance analysis of EuroSCORE II compared to the original logistic EuroSCORE and STS scores for predicting 30-day mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. , 2013, The American journal of cardiology.

[11]  Richard B Devereux,et al.  Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardio , 2005, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[12]  Susheel Kodali,et al.  Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement for inoperable severe aortic stenosis. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  R. Bansal,et al.  Clinical profile and natural history of 453 nonsurgically managed patients with severe aortic stenosis. , 2006, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[14]  M. Enriquez-Sarano,et al.  Aortic valve stenosis in community medical practice: determinants of outcome and implications for aortic valve replacement. , 2012, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[15]  C. Berry,et al.  The changing course of aortic valve disease in Scotland: temporal trends in hospitalizations and mortality and prognostic importance of aortic stenosis. , 2013, European heart journal.

[16]  D. Mark,et al.  The Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valve (PARTNER) trial: a health economic and policy perspective. , 2012, Circulation.

[17]  Claire Duvernoy,et al.  Evaluation of Patients With Severe Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis Who Do Not Undergo Aortic Valve Replacement: The Potential Role of Subjectively Overestimated Operative Risk , 2009, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[18]  Danica Marinac-Dabic,et al.  The STS-ACC transcatheter valve therapy national registry: a new partnership and infrastructure for the introduction and surveillance of medical devices and therapies. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  M. Chu,et al.  Bicuspid aortic valve disease , 2013, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[20]  W. O’Neill,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Compared With Standard Care Among Inoperable Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis: Results From the Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) Trial (Cohort B) , 2012, Circulation.