Effect of captopril on mortality and morbidity in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. Results of the survival and ventricular enlargement trial. The SAVE Investigators.

BACKGROUND Left ventricular dilatation and dysfunction after myocardial infarction are major predictors of death. In experimental and clinical studies, longterm therapy with the angiotensin-converting--enzyme inhibitor captopril attenuated ventricular dilatation and remodeling. We investigated whether captopril could reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after a myocardial infarction. METHODS Within 3 to 16 days after myocardial infarction, 2231 patients with ejection fractions of 40 percent or less but without overt heart failure or symptoms of myocardial ischemia were randomly assigned to receive doubleblind treatment with either placebo (1116 patients) or captopril (1115 patients) and were followed for an average of 42 months. RESULTS Mortality from all causes was significantly reduced in the captopril group (228 deaths, or 20 percent) as compared with the placebo group (275 deaths, or 25 percent); the reduction in risk was 19 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 3 to 32 percent; P = 0.019). In addition, the incidence of both fatal and nonfatal major cardiovascular events was consistently reduced in the captopril group. The reduction in risk was 21 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 5 to 35 percent; P = 0.014) for death from cardiovascular causes, 37 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 20 to 50 percent; P less than 0.001) for the development of severe heart failure, 22 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 4 to 37 percent; P = 0.019) for congestive heart failure requiring hospitalization, and 25 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 5 to 40 percent; P = 0.015) for recurrent myocardial infarction. CONCLUSIONS In patients with asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction, long-term administration of captopril was associated with an improvement in survival and reduced morbidity and mortality due to major cardiovascular events. These benefits were observed in patients who received thrombolytic therapy, aspirin, or beta-blockers, as well as those who did not, suggesting that treatment with captopril leads to additional improvement in outcome among selected survivors of myocardial infarction.

[1]  M. Pfeffer,et al.  Left Ventricular Diastolic Pressure‐Volume Relations in Rats with Healed Myocardial Infarction: Effects on Systolic Function , 1981, Circulation research.

[2]  J. Ritchie,et al.  Risk stratification for 1 year survival based on characteristics identified in the early hours of acute myocardial infarction. The Western Washington Intracoronary Streptokinase Trial. , 1986, Circulation.

[3]  E. Gilpin,et al.  Limitations and advantages of the ejection fraction for defining high risk after acute myocardial infarction. , 1986, The American journal of cardiology.

[4]  M. Pfeffer,et al.  Ventricular Remodeling After Myocardial Infarction: Experimental Observations and Clinical Implications , 1990, Circulation.

[5]  M. Pfeffer,et al.  Rationale, design and baseline characteristics of the survival and ventricular enlargement trial , 1991 .

[6]  J. Kalbfleisch,et al.  The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data , 1980 .

[7]  E. Gilpin,et al.  A decision scheme for coronary angiography after acute myocardial infarction. , 1989, Circulation.

[8]  K. Hammermeister,et al.  Variables predictive of survival in patients with coronary disease. Selection by univariate and multivariate analyses from the clinical, electrocardiographic, exercise, arteriographic, and quantitative angiographic evaluations. , 1979, Circulation.

[9]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Risk stratification and survival after myocardial infarction. , 1983, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  J. S. Janicki,et al.  Cardiac myocyte necrosis induced by angiotensin II. , 1991, Circulation research.

[11]  J. B. Garrison,et al.  Regional cardiac dilatation after acute myocardial infarction: recognition by two-dimensional echocardiography. , 1979, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  F. Klocke,et al.  Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute myocardial infarction , 1990 .

[13]  W Grossman,et al.  Left ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction: a corollary to infarct expansion. , 1986, Circulation.

[14]  P Smith,et al.  The effect of warfarin on mortality and reinfarction after myocardial infarction. , 1990, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  G. Lamas,et al.  Effect of captopril on progressive ventricular dilatation after anterior myocardial infarction. , 1988, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  R M Whitlock,et al.  Left ventricular end-systolic volume as the major determinant of survival after recovery from myocardial infarction. , 1987, Circulation.

[17]  Salim Yusuf,et al.  Effect of enalapril on survival in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fractions and congestive heart failure. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  M. Pfeffer,et al.  Survival after an experimental myocardial infarction: beneficial effects of long-term therapy with captopril. , 1985, Circulation.

[19]  W. Kannel Epidemiology and prevention of cardiac failure: Framingham Study insights. , 1987, European heart journal.

[20]  D. Roden,et al.  Congestive heart failure after acute myocardial infarction in patients receiving antiarrhythmic agents for ventricular premature complexes (Cardiac Arrhythmia Pilot Study). , 1989, The American journal of cardiology.

[21]  R. Virmani,et al.  Pharmacologic perturbation of neutrophils by Fluosol results in a sustained reduction in infarct size in the canine model of reperfusion. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[22]  W. Kannel,et al.  Prognosis after initial myocardial infarction: the Framingham study. , 1979, The American journal of cardiology.

[23]  G. Lamas,et al.  Activation of neurohumoral systems following acute myocardial infarction. , 1991, The American journal of cardiology.

[24]  A. Moss,et al.  Prognosis and management after a first myocardial infarction. , 1990, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  R. Jeremy,et al.  Patterns of left ventricular dilation during the six months after myocardial infarction. , 1989, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[26]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Relation between beta-adrenergic blocker use, various correlates of left ventricular function and the chance of developing congestive heart failure. The Multicenter Diltiazem Post-Infarction Research Group. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[27]  G. Ertl,et al.  Early remodelling of the left ventricle in patients with myocardial infarction. , 1990, European heart journal.

[28]  M. Pfeffer,et al.  Influence of Chronic Captopril Therapy on the Infarcted Left Ventricle of the Rat , 1985, Circulation research.

[29]  J. Laragh,et al.  Association of the renin-sodium profile with the risk of myocardial infarction in patients with hypertension. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[30]  N. Sharpe,et al.  TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH SYMPTOMLESS LEFT VENTRICULAR DYSFUNCTION AFTER MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION , 1988, The Lancet.

[31]  F. Tristani,et al.  Effect of Vasodilator Therapy on Mortality in Chronic Congestive Heart Failure , 1986 .

[32]  J. Giudicelli,et al.  Systemic and regional hemodynamic profile of five angiotensin I converting enzyme inhibitors in the spontaneously hypertensive rat. , 1987, The American journal of cardiology.