The effect of pore size and magnetic susceptibility on the surface NMR relaxation parameter T 2

Surface nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) is a non-invasive geophysical method that can provide valuable information about aquifer properties related to groundwater flow and storage. Our ability to extract such information from surface NMR data, however, is limited by an insufficient understanding of the relaxation parameter T 2 * governing the decay rate of the surface NMR signal in Earth’s magnetic field. In this study, we use a combination of numerical and laboratory experiments to systematically explore the effect of two key geologic properties, pore size and magnetic susceptibility, on the T 2 * relaxation process. A one-dimensional numerical model is developed and parametrized to simulate the surface NMR response for a wide range of geologic materials. These simulations illuminate the processes controlling T 2 * relaxation and identify conditions under which T 2 * exhibits varied sensitivity to pore size. For materials with low magnetic susceptibility, T 2 * is highly sensitive to pore size; however, as susceptibility increases, this sensitivity diminishes and T 2 * becomes dominated by complex dephasing effects, particularly when pores are large. Laboratory Earth’s field NMR experiments complement the numerical simulations. Measurements on water-saturated quartz sands show that for weakly magnetic materials, T 2 * can be sensitive to pore size and thus could provide useful information about aquifer properties.

[1]  Jean-Michel Baltassat,et al.  Nuclear magnetic resonance as a geophysical tool for hydrogeologists , 2002 .

[2]  Jean-Michel Vouillamoz,et al.  Application of integrated magnetic resonance sounding and resistivity methods for borehole implementation : a case study in Cambodia , 2002 .

[3]  Chris Morriss,et al.  Core Analysis By Low-field Nmr , 1997 .

[4]  B. Audoly,et al.  Correlation functions for inhomogeneous magnetic field in random media with application to a dense random pack of spheres. , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[5]  Ugur Yaramanci,et al.  Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) properties of unconsolidated sediments in field and laboratory , 2005 .

[6]  J. Roy,et al.  Hydrogeological interpretation and potential of the new magnetic resonance sounding, MRS, method , 2003 .

[7]  Subir K. Banerjee,et al.  Magnetic Properties of Rocks and Minerals , 2013 .

[8]  Anatoly Legchenko,et al.  A review of the basic principles for proton magnetic resonance sounding measurements , 2002 .

[9]  R. Ehrlich,et al.  Pore-Size Distribution And NMR In Microporous Cherty Sandstones , 1989 .

[10]  H. Carr,et al.  DIFFUSION AND NUCLEAR SPIN RELAXATION IN WATER , 1958 .

[11]  Hürlimann,et al.  Effective Gradients in Porous Media Due to Susceptibility Differences , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[12]  J. Roy,et al.  Widespread occurrence of aquifers currently undetectable with the MRS technique in the Grenville geological province, Canada , 2004 .

[13]  P. Callaghan,et al.  New Zealand Developments in Earth's Field NMR , 2007 .

[14]  W. E. Kenyon,et al.  A Three-Part Study of NMR Longitudinal Relaxation Properties of Water-Saturated Sandstones , 1988 .

[15]  Bruce J Balcom,et al.  The internal magnetic field distribution, and single exponential magnetic resonance free induction decay, in rocks. , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[16]  Marian Hertrich,et al.  Imaging of groundwater with nuclear magnetic resonance , 2008 .

[17]  E. Purcell,et al.  Effects of Diffusion on Free Precession in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Experiments , 1954 .

[18]  Kevin P. Munn,et al.  A NMR technique for the analysis of pore structure: Application to materials with well-defined pore structure , 1987 .

[19]  U. Yaramanci,et al.  Surface NMR within a geophysical study of an aquifer at Haldensleben (Germany) , 1999 .

[20]  Yi-Qiao Song Using internal magnetic fields to obtain pore size distributions of porous media , 2003 .

[21]  D. J. Bergman,et al.  Nuclear Magnetic Resonance: Petrophysical and Logging Applications , 2011 .

[22]  A. Legchenko,et al.  A new direct non-invasive groundwater detection technology for Australia , 1991 .

[23]  K. Brownstein,et al.  Importance of classical diffusion in NMR studies of water in biological cells , 1979 .

[24]  H P Huinink,et al.  Random-walk simulations of NMR dephasing effects due to uniform magnetic-field gradients in a pore. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[25]  David O. Walsh,et al.  Multi-channel surface NMR instrumentation and software for 1D/2D groundwater investigations , 2008 .

[26]  F. Rubio,et al.  The use of MRS in the determination of hydraulic transmissivity: The case of alluvial aquifers , 2008 .

[27]  A. Timur,et al.  Pulsed Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Studies of Porosity, Movable Fluid, and Permeability of Sandstones , 1969 .