Tracking reliability and helpfulness in agent interactions

A critical aspect of open systems such as the Internet is the interactions amongst the component agents of the system. Often this interaction is organised around social principles, in that one agent may request the help of another, and in turn may make a commitment to assist another when requested. In this paper we investigate two measures of the social responsibility of an agent known as reliability and helpfulness. Intuitively, reliability measures how good an agent is at keeping its commitments, and helpfulness measures how willing an agent is to make a commitment, when requested for help. We discuss these notions in the context of FIPA protocols. It is important to note that these measures are dependent only on the messages exchanged between the agents, and do not make any assumptions about the internal organisation of the agents. This means that these measures are both applicable to any variety of software agent, and externally verifiable, i.e. able to be calculated by anyone with access to the messages exchanged.

[1]  C. Castelfranchi,et al.  Social Trust : A Cognitive Approach , 2000 .

[2]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Towards a social level characterisation of socially responsible agents , 1997, IEE Proc. Softw. Eng..

[3]  Jordi Sabater-Mir,et al.  Reputation and social network analysis in multi-agent systems , 2002, AAMAS '02.

[4]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Socially Rational Agents , 1997 .

[5]  Munindar P. Singh,et al.  Commitment Machines , 2001, ATAL.

[6]  Amedeo Cesta,et al.  Effects of Different Interaction Attitudes on a Multi-Agent System Performance , 1996, MAAMAW.

[7]  Munindar P. Singh,et al.  A Social Mechanism of Reputation Management in Electronic Communities , 2000, CIA.

[8]  Andrzej Skowron,et al.  Logical Foundations of Computer Science , 1997, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[9]  Vijay V. Raghavan,et al.  A critical investigation of recall and precision as measures of retrieval system performance , 1989, TOIS.

[10]  Sarvapali D. Ramchurn,et al.  Trust in multi-agent systems , 2004, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[11]  Michael Winikoff,et al.  Avoiding Resource Conflicts in Intelligent Agents , 2002, ECAI.

[12]  Reid G. Smith,et al.  The Contract Net Protocol: High-Level Communication and Control in a Distributed Problem Solver , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[13]  John McCarthy,et al.  Making Robots Conscious of Their Mental States , 1995, Machine Intelligence 15.

[14]  Jordi Sabater-Mir,et al.  REGRET: reputation in gregarious societies , 2001, AGENTS '01.

[15]  Allen Newell,et al.  The Knowledge Level , 1989, Artif. Intell..

[16]  N. James,et al.  Know how , 2002, Antiquity.

[17]  Marco Colombetti,et al.  Operational specification of a commitment-based agent communication language , 2002, AAMAS '02.

[18]  Munindar P. Singh,et al.  Detecting deception in reputation management , 2003, AAMAS '03.

[19]  Charles Warlow Utrecht , 2008, Practical Neurology.

[20]  Munindar P. Singh,et al.  Search in Referral Networks , 2002 .

[21]  Alexander Dekhtyar,et al.  Information Retrieval , 2018, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[22]  Cristiano Castelfranchi,et al.  Guarantees for Autonomy in Cognitive Agent Architecture , 1995, ECAI Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages.

[23]  Michael Luck,et al.  Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems , 2002 .

[24]  Lin Padgham,et al.  Agent Capabilities: Extending BDI Theory , 2000, AAAI/IAAI.

[25]  Cyril W. Cleverdon,et al.  Factors determining the performance of indexing systems , 1966 .

[26]  Marco Colombetti,et al.  A COMMITMENT-BASED APPROACH TO AGENT COMMUNICATION , 2004, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[27]  Russell Smith The contract net protocol , 1980 .

[28]  Martine De Cock,et al.  Applied Artificial Intelligence , 2006 .

[29]  Cyril W. Cleverdon,et al.  Aslib Cranfield research project - Factors determining the performance of indexing systems; Volume 1, Design; Part 2, Appendices , 1966 .

[30]  Sarvapali D. Ramchurn,et al.  Trust evaluation through relationship analysis , 2005, AAMAS '05.

[31]  John-Jules Ch. Meyer,et al.  A Logic of Capabilities , 1994, LFCS.

[32]  Michael Rovatsos,et al.  Using trust for detecting deceitful agents in artificial societies , 2000, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[33]  G. SmithR. The Contract Net Protocol , 1980 .

[34]  Michael Luck,et al.  Engagement and Cooperating in Motivated Agent Modelling , 1995, DAI.

[35]  John McCarthy NOTES ON SELF-AWARENESS , 2004 .

[36]  Anand S. Rao,et al.  Modeling Rational Agents within a BDI-Architecture , 1997, KR.