Modeling pattern noise in responses of fly motion detectors to naturalistic scenes

Insects have a very efficient visual system that helps them to perform extraordinarily complicated navigational acts and precisely controlled aerobatic flight. Physiological evidence suggests that flight control is guided by a small system of 'tangential' neurons tuned to very specific types of complex motion by the way that they collate information from local motion detectors. One class of tangential neurons, the 'horizontal system' (HS) neurons, respond with opponent graded responses to yaw stimuli. Using the results of physiological experiments, we have developed a model, based on an array of Reichardt correlators, for the receptive field of HS neurons that view optical flow along the equator. Our model incorporates additional non-linearities that mimic known properties of the insect motion pathway, including logarithmic encoding of luminance, saturation and motion adaptation (adaptive gain-control). In this paper, we compare the response of our elaborated model with fly HS neuron responses to naturalistic image panoramas. Such responses are dominated by noise which is largely non-random. Deviations in the correlator response are likely due to the structure of the visual scene, which we term "Pattern noise". To investigate the influence of anisotropic features in producing pattern noise, we presented a panoramic image at various initial positions, and versions of the same image modified to disrupt vertical contours. We conclude that the response of the fly neurons shows evidence of local saturation at key stages in the motion pathway. This saturation reduces the effect of pattern noise and improves the coding of velocity. Our model provides an excellent basis for the development of biomimetic yaw sensors for robotic applications.

[1]  Derek Abbott,et al.  Elaborated Reichardt correlators for velocity estimation tasks , 2002, SPIE Micro + Nano Materials, Devices, and Applications.

[2]  R. B. Pinter Adaptation of receptive field spatial organization via multiplicative lateral inhibition. , 1984, Journal of theoretical biology.

[3]  William Bialek,et al.  Statistics of Natural Images: Scaling in the Woods , 1993, NIPS.

[4]  W Reichardt,et al.  Functional structure of a mechanism of perception of optical movement , 1958 .

[5]  Robert B. Pinter,et al.  Image Motion Processing in Biological and Computer Vision Systems , 1989, Other Conferences.

[6]  J. Howard,et al.  Response of an insect photoreceptor: a simple log-normal model , 1981, Nature.

[7]  A. Borst,et al.  Dendritic integration and its role in computing image velocity. , 1998, Science.

[8]  Klein,et al.  Nonlinear directionally selective subunits in complex cells of cat striate cortex. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  S. Laughlin Matching coding, circuits, cells, and molecules to signals: General principles of retinal design in the fly's eye , 1994, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[10]  Peter J. Sobey Determining range information from self-motion: the template model , 1991, Other Conferences.

[11]  S. McKee,et al.  Precise velocity discrimination despite random variations in temporal frequency and contrast , 1986, Vision Research.

[12]  R Hengstenberg,et al.  Dendritic structure and receptive-field organization of optic flow processing interneurons in the fly. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  W. Reichardt,et al.  Computational structure of a biological motion-detection system as revealed by local detector analysis in the fly's nervous system. , 1989, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[14]  Daniel L. Ruderman,et al.  Origins of scaling in natural images , 1996, Vision Research.

[15]  Zhang,et al.  Honeybee navigation en route to the goal: visual flight control and odometry , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[16]  Robert A. Harris,et al.  Adaptation and the temporal delay filter of fly motion detectors , 1999, Vision Research.

[17]  Martin Egelhaaf,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Visual Course Control in Insects , 1989 .

[18]  Kamran Eshraghian,et al.  Two-dimensional motion detector based on insect vision , 1996, Advanced Imaging and Network Technologies.

[19]  Andrew Charles James,et al.  White-noise studies in the fly lamina , 1990 .

[20]  S. Laughlin,et al.  Adaptation of the motion-sensitive neuron H1 is generated locally and governed by contrast frequency , 1985, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[21]  Robert A. Harris,et al.  Contrast Gain Reduction in Fly Motion Adaptation , 2000, Neuron.

[22]  A. Dubs,et al.  The dynamics of phototransduction in insects , 1984, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[23]  E H Adelson,et al.  Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[24]  Ron O. Dror,et al.  Accuracy of Visual Velocity Estimation by Reichardt Correlators , 1998 .

[25]  K. Kirschfeld,et al.  Motion sensitivity in the nucleus of the basal optic root of the pigeon. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  A. Borst,et al.  Transient and steady-state response properties of movement detectors. , 1989, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[27]  J. van Santen,et al.  Elaborated Reichardt detectors. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[28]  J. H. van Hateren,et al.  Modelling the Power Spectra of Natural Images: Statistics and Information , 1996, Vision Research.