A Low-Carbon Fuel Standard for California, Part 2: Policy Analysis

The Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) can play a major role in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and stimulating improvements in transportation fuel technologies so that California can meet its climate policy goals. In Part 1 of this study we evaluated the technical feasibility of achieving a 10 percent reduction in the carbon intensity (measured in gCO2e/MJ) of transportation fuels in California by 2020. We identified six scenarios based on a variety of different technologies that could meet or exceed this goal, and concluded that the goal was ambitious but attainable. In Part 2, we examine many of the specific policy issues needed to achieve this ambitious target. Our recommendations are based on the best information we were able to gather in the time available, including consultation with many different stakeholders. The recommendations are intended to assist the California Air Resources Board, Energy Commission, and Public Utility Commission, as well as private organizations and individuals, in addressing the many complex issues involved in designing a low carbon fuel standard. Choices about specific policies and calculation of numeric values for use in regulation must, of course, be made by these regulatory agencies. The analysis we present here is only illustrative.

[1]  Bruce A. McCarl,et al.  Competitiveness of terrestrial greenhouse gas offsets: are they a bridge to the future? , 2007 .

[2]  C. Wene.  Experience Curves for Energy Technology Policy , 2000 .

[3]  J. Mathews.  Biofuels : What a Biopact between North and South could achieve , 2007 .

[4]  Richard S. J. Tol,et al.  The Marginal Costs of Greenhouse Gas Emissions , 1999 .

[5]  Marilyn A Brown.  Market failures and barriers as a basis for clean energy policies , 2001 .

[6]  Robert W. Hahn,et al.  Economic Prescriptions for Environmental Problems: How the Patient Followed the Doctor's Orders , 1989 .

[7]  G. Meehl,et al.  The Importance of Land-Cover Change in Simulating Future Climates , 2005, Science.

[8]  Gregg Marland,et al.  The climatic impacts of land surface change and carbon management, and the implications for climate-change mitigation policy , 2003 .

[9]  Scott Elliott,et al.  Compensation of atmospheric CO2 buildup through engineered chemical sinkage , 2001 .

[10]  Vicki Norberg-Bohm,et al.  THE ROLE OF GOVERNMENT IN ENERGY TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION: INSIGHTS FOR GOVERNMENT POLICY IN THE ENERGY SECTOR , 2002 .

[11]  A. Frank,et al.  Hybrid vehicles gain traction. , 2006, Scientific American.

[12]  P Watson,et al.  Carbon reporting within the renewable transport fuel obligation - methodology , 2007 .

[13]  Thomas S Turrentine,et al.  Symbolism In Early Markets For Hybrid Electric Vehicles , 2007 .

[14]  M. A. Adelman,et al.  The Economics of Petroleum Supply , 1993 .

[15]  Andrew D. Jones,et al.  Energy and Greenhouse Impacts of Biofuels , 2007 .

[16]  Brett David Williams,et al.  Commercializing light-duty plug-in/plug-out hydrogen-fuel-cell vehicles: , 2007 .

[17]  Christopher Potter,et al.  Terrestrial Biomass and the Effects of Deforestation on the Global Carbon Cycle , 1999 .

[18]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  Profile of the petroleum refining industry in california: California industries of the future program , 2004 .

[19]  Reid R. Heffner,et al.  Symbolism in California’s Early Market for Hybrid Electric Vehicles , 2007 .

[20]  A Second-Best Analysis of Environmental Subsidies , 1998 .

[21]  Philippe Quirion,et al.  Does uncertainty justify intensity emission caps , 2005 .

[22]  John B. Heywood,et al.  Coordinated Policy Measures for Reducing the Fuel Consumption of the U.S. Light-Duty Vehicle Fleet , 2004 .

[23]  J. Levine.  Zoned Out: Regulation, Markets, and Choices in Transportation and Metropolitan Land Use , 2005 .

[24]  Alexander E. Farrell,et al.  Creating Markets for Green Biofuels: Measuring and improving environmental performance , 2007 .

[25]  M. Dry,et al.  The Fischer–Tropsch process: 1950–2000 , 2002 .

[26]  Richard A. Houghton,et al.  Why are estimates of the terrestrial carbon balance so different? , 2003 .

[27]  C. Taylor,et al.  Stern Review: The Economics of Climate Change , 2006 .

[28]  Dermot Gately,et al.  OPEC's Incentives for Faster Output Growth , 2004 .

[29]  Ken Caldeira,et al.  Climate effects of global land cover change , 2005 .

[30]  Mark A. Delucchi,et al.  Quantifying the benefits of hybrid vehicles , 2006 .

[31]  Daniel Sperling,et al.  Using Geographic Information Systems to Evaluate Siting and Networks of Hydrogen Stations , 2004 .

[32]  Jan Corfee-Morlot,et al.  CDM: Taking stock and looking forward , 2007 .

[33]  S. Scotchmer,et al.  Innovation and Incentives , 2004 .

[34]  Christopher R. Knittel,et al.  Sacred Cars? Optimal Regulation of Stationary and Non-Stationary Pollution Sources , 2008 .

[35]  David W. Keith,et al.  Using CaO- and MgO-rich industrial waste streams for carbon sequestration , 2005 .

[36]  T. Ochsner,et al.  Tillage and soil carbon sequestration—What do we really know? , 2007 .

[37]  Stephen J. DeCanio,et al.  Economic models of climate change : a critique , 2003 .

[38]  David W. Keith,et al.  Climate Strategy with Co2 Capture from the Air , 2001 .

[39]  D. B. Hess,et al.  Policy Support for and Barriers to Transit-Oriented Development in the Inner City: Literature Review , 2004 .

[40]  David L. Greene,et al.  Feebates, rebates and gas-guzzler taxes: a study of incentives for increased fuel economy , 2005 .

[41]  Guihua Wang,et al.  Lifecycle Analysis of Air Quality Impacts of Hydrogen and Gasoline Transportation Fuel Pathways , 2008 .

[42]  Mark A. Delucchi,et al.  Conceptual and Methodological Issues in Lifecycle Analyses of Transportation Fuels , 2004 .

[43]  Marc Ross,et al.  Capital Budgeting Practices of Twelve Large Manufacturers , 1986 .

[44]  R. Houghton.  The annual net flux of carbon to the atmosphere from changes in land use 1850–1990* , 1999 .

[45]  B. Metz.  IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage , 2005 .

[46]  Anthony R. Kovscek,et al.  Increasing CO2 storage in oil recovery , 2005 .

[47]  D. Tilman,et al.  Carbon-Negative Biofuels from Low-Input High-Diversity Grassland Biomass , 2006, Science.

[48]  James Bushnell,et al.  Market Power in California's Gasoline Market , 2004 .

[49]  K. Malmedal,et al.  Energy Policy Act of 2005 , 2007, IEEE Industry Applications Magazine.

[50]  Judith Gurney.  BP Statistical Review of World Energy , 1985 .

[51]  Adam R. Brandt,et al.  Scraping the bottom of the barrel: greenhouse gas emission consequences of a transition to low-quality and synthetic petroleum resources , 2007 .

[52]  Jennifer Allen,et al.  INVENTORY OF CALIFORNIA GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS AND SINKS: 1990 TO 2002 UPDATE PREPARED IN SUPPORT OF THE 2005 INTEGRATED ENERGY POLICY REPORT , 2005 .

[53]  James J. Winebrake,et al.  The AFV credit program and its role in future AFV market development , 1997 .

[54]  Joan M. Ogden,et al.  The role of biomass in California's hydrogen economy , 2008 .

[55]  David W. Keith,et al.  Fossil Fuels Without CO2 Emissions , 1998, Science.

[56]  J. Canadell,et al.  Recent patterns and mechanisms of carbon exchange by terrestrial ecosystems , 2001, Nature.

[57]  M. Melaina.  Initiating hydrogen infrastructures: preliminary analysis of a sufficient number of initial hydrogen stations in the US , 2003 .

[58]  André Faaij,et al.  Identification of early opportunities for CO2 sequestration—worldwide screening for CO2-EOR and CO2-ECBM projects , 2005 .

[59]  Klaus S. Lackner,et al.  CARBONATE CHEMISTRY FOR SEQUESTERING FOSSIL CARBON , 2003 .

[60]  Catrinus Jepma,et al.  Climate Policy 3 , 2003 .