Randomized Trial Comparing In-Situ Radiofrequency Ablation andMilligan-Morgan Hemorrhoidectomy inProlapsing Hemorrhoids

: The Milligan-Morgan (MM) operation is the most widely practiced procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids. But it is also associated with a fair amount of postoperative pain, a long period of convalescence, and complications like bleeding and anal stenosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of in-situ radiofrequency ablation (RA) of hemorrhoids. During a 6-month period, 40 patients with grade 3 hemorrhoids were prospectively randomized for RA (21 patients) or MM hemorrhoidectomy (19 patients). Patients were evaluated for operative time, postoperative pain, time to return to work and occurrence of early and late complications. Duration of surgery was significantly higher in the MM group (p<0.0001). Postoperative hospitalization was longer in the MM group (p<0.001). The post defecation pain and pain at rest were much less in the RA group (p<0.001). Wound healing period (16.3 vs. 37.5 days) and time to return to work (7.3 vs. 18.3 days) were other significant findings. Early complications occurred more frequently in the MM group, but late complications like external skin tags [4 patients vs. 2 patients] and one asymptomatic recurrence was noted in the RA group. In-situ RA of prolapsing hemorrhoids is a quick and bloodless procedure. It is associated with significantly less postoperative pain, shorter hospital stay and early return to normal activity. It can be considered as an alternative to conventional hemorrhoidectomy.

[1]  Pravin J. Gupta.  Novel technique: radiofrequency coagulation--a treatment alternative for early-stage hemorrhoids. , 2002, MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine.

[2]  J. Wedman,et al.  Treatment of Simple Snoring Using Radio Waves for Ablation of Uvula and Soft Palate: A Day‐Case Surgery Procedure , 2002, The Laryngoscope.

[3]  M. Oya,et al.  A Prospective Randomized Comparison Between an Open Hemorrhoidectomy and a Semi-Closed (Semi-Open) Hemorrhoidectomy , 2002, Surgery Today.

[4]  J. Sayfan,et al.  Sutureless Closed Hemorrhoidectomy: A New Technique , 2001, Annals of surgery.

[5]  J. Pfenninger,et al.  Common anorectal conditions: Part II. Lesions. , 2001, American family physician.

[6]  Goldberg Sn,et al.  Radiofrequency tissue ablation: physical principles and techniques for increasing coagulation necrosis. , 2001 .

[7]  D. Hemingway,et al.  Pain after stapled haemorrhoidectomy , 2000, The Lancet.

[8]  M. Pescatori.  Pain after stapled haemorrhoidectomy , 2000, The Lancet.

[9]  A. O'Bichere,et al.  Randomized clinical trial of sutured versus stapled closed haemorrhoidectomy , 2000, The British journal of surgery.

[10]  V. Fazio.  Early promise of stapling technique for haemorrhoidectomy , 2000, The Lancet.

[11]  D. Hemingway,et al.  Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial , 2000, The Lancet.

[12]  C. Ingoldby,et al.  A prospective randomized study of calcium alginate (Sorbsan) versus standard gauze packing following haemorrhoidectomy. , 1998, Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh.

[13]  J. Gornbein,et al.  Prospective randomized comparative study of bipolar electrocoagulation versus heater probe for treatment of chronically bleeding internal hemorrhoids. , 1997, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[14]  C. Casciani,et al.  [Submucosal hemorrhoidectomy with a radiofrequency bistoury]. , 1997, Minerva chirurgica.

[15]  C. Kainz,et al.  Radiosurgery in the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. , 1996, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[16]  A. Anselmo,et al.  [Treatment of hemorrhoidal peduncles with diathermy probe]. , 1995, Annali italiani di chirurgia.

[17]  S L Dawson,et al.  Tissue ablation with radiofrequency: effect of probe size, gauge, duration, and temperature on lesion volume. , 1995, Academic radiology.

[18]  T. Ikeda,et al.  A novel therapy for internal hemorrhoids: ligation of the hemorrhoidal artery with a newly devised instrument (Moricorn) in conjunction with a Doppler flowmeter. , 1995, The American journal of gastroenterology.

[19]  M. Saidi,et al.  Comparison of office loop electrosurgical conization and cold knife conization. , 1994, The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists.

[20]  E. Leff.  Hemorrhoidectomy — laservs. nonlaser: Outpatient surgical experience , 1992, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[21]  S. Huang.  Advances in Applications of Radiofrequency Current to Catheter Ablation Therapy , 1991, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[22]  Jinn Shiun Chen,et al.  The role of lasers in hemorrhoidectomy , 1991, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[23]  M. S. Valinsky,et al.  Treatment of verrucae via radio wave surgery. , 1990, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.

[24]  R. Newton,et al.  Direct current electrotherapy of internal hemorrhoids: an effective, safe, and painless outpatient approach. , 1989, The American journal of gastroenterology.

[25]  S. Hussain,et al.  Incisions with knife or diathermy and postoperative pain , 1988, The British journal of surgery.

[26]  L. E. Smith.  Hemorrhoids. A review of current techniques and management. , 1987, Gastroenterology clinics of North America.

[27]  S. Nivatvongs,et al.  The shape of the buttocks , 1983, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[28]  R. Leicester,et al.  Infrared coagulation: A new treatment for hemorrhoids , 1981, Diseases of the colon and rectum.