Mechanisms of enhanced drug delivery in brain metastases with focused ultrasound-induced blood–tumor barrier disruption

Significance Improved penetration along with accurate prediction and mechanistic understanding of anticancer agent delivery across the blood–brain/blood–tumor barrier (BBB/BTB) are essential for the rational development of effective therapeutic strategies in intracranial malignancies. In this study, we provide insights in drug pharmacokinetics in brain metastases after focused ultrasound-induced BBB/BTB disruption by integrating quantitative microscopy with mathematical modeling. We demonstrate that focused ultrasound-induced BBB/BTB disruption contributes to enhanced interstitial convective transport in solid tumors, in addition to alleviating vascular barriers, and provide evidence of improved penetration of nontargeted and antibody-targeted chemotherapies. Together, our work provides a unified framework for prospective, quantitative, and mechanistic investigation of the penetration of anticancer drugs across the BBB/BTB in brain tumors. Blood–brain/blood–tumor barriers (BBB and BTB) and interstitial transport may constitute major obstacles to the transport of therapeutics in brain tumors. In this study, we examined the impact of focused ultrasound (FUS) in combination with microbubbles on the transport of two relevant chemotherapy-based anticancer agents in breast cancer brain metastases at cellular resolution: doxorubicin, a nontargeted chemotherapeutic, and ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), an antibody–drug conjugate. Using an orthotopic xenograft model of HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastasis and quantitative microscopy, we demonstrate significant increases in the extravasation of both agents (sevenfold and twofold for doxorubicin and T-DM1, respectively), and we provide evidence of increased drug penetration (>100 vs. <20 µm and 42 ± 7 vs. 12 ± 4 µm for doxorubicin and T-DM1, respectively) after the application of FUS compared with control (non-FUS). Integration of experimental data with physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling of drug transport reveals that FUS in combination with microbubbles alleviates vascular barriers and enhances interstitial convective transport via an increase in hydraulic conductivity. Experimental data demonstrate that FUS in combination with microbubbles enhances significantly the endothelial cell uptake of the small chemotherapeutic agent. Quantification with PBPK modeling reveals an increase in transmembrane transport by more than two orders of magnitude. PBPK modeling indicates a selective increase in transvascular transport of doxorubicin through small vessel wall pores with a narrow range of sizes (diameter, 10–50 nm). Our work provides a quantitative framework for the optimization of FUS–drug combinations to maximize intratumoral drug delivery and facilitate the development of strategies to treat brain metastases.

[1]  Timothy W. Secomb,et al.  Transport of drugs from blood vessels to tumour tissue , 2017, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[2]  Triantafyllos Stylianopoulos,et al.  Reengineering the Physical Microenvironment of Tumors to Improve Drug Delivery and Efficacy: From Mathematical Modeling to Bench to Bedside. , 2018, Trends in cancer.

[3]  J. Panyam,et al.  Injectable sustained release microparticles of curcumin: a new concept for cancer chemoprevention. , 2010, Cancer research.

[4]  R. Jain,et al.  Combined targeting of HER2 and VEGFR2 for effective treatment of HER2-amplified breast cancer brain metastases , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  R K Jain,et al.  Transport of molecules in the tumor interstitium: a review. , 1987, Cancer research.

[6]  J. Polli,et al.  Lapatinib Distribution in HER2 Overexpressing Experimental Brain Metastases of Breast Cancer , 2011, Pharmaceutical Research.

[7]  M. Roussel,et al.  Medulloblastoma Genotype Dictates Blood Brain Barrier Phenotype. , 2016, Cancer cell.

[8]  Victor Frenkel,et al.  Ultrasound mediated delivery of drugs and genes to solid tumors. , 2008, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[9]  A. Di Leo,et al.  Continued value of adjuvant anthracyclines as treatment for early breast cancer. , 2015, The Lancet. Oncology.

[10]  C. Miller,et al.  The brain microenvironment mediates resistance in luminal breast cancer to PI3K inhibition through HER3 activation , 2017, Science Translational Medicine.

[11]  R. Jain,et al.  Strategies for advancing cancer nanomedicine. , 2013, Nature materials.

[12]  W. Wick,et al.  Impact of Blood–Brain Barrier Integrity on Tumor Growth and Therapy Response in Brain Metastases , 2016, Clinical Cancer Research.

[13]  P. Steeg,et al.  Heterogeneous Blood–Tumor Barrier Permeability Determines Drug Efficacy in Experimental Brain Metastases of Breast Cancer , 2010, Clinical Cancer Research.

[14]  M. Sliwkowski,et al.  Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1): a novel agent for targeting HER2+ breast cancer. , 2011, Clinical breast cancer.

[15]  F. Markowetz,et al.  Cancer Evolution: Mathematical Models and Computational Inference , 2014, Systematic biology.

[16]  E. Neuwelt,et al.  Outwitting the blood-brain barrier for therapeutic purposes: osmotic opening and other means. , 1998, Neurosurgery.

[17]  K. Hoang-Xuan,et al.  Clinical trial of blood-brain barrier disruption by pulsed ultrasound , 2016, Science Translational Medicine.

[18]  M. Livingstone,et al.  Controlled Ultrasound-Induced Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption Using Passive Acoustic Emissions Monitoring , 2012, PloS one.

[19]  N. McDannold,et al.  Ultrasound-mediated blood-brain/blood-tumor barrier disruption improves outcomes with trastuzumab in a breast cancer brain metastasis model. , 2012, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[20]  S. Eikenberry Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling Open Access a Tumor Cord Model for Doxorubicin Delivery and Dose Optimization in Solid Tumors , 2022 .

[21]  Triantafyllos Stylianopoulos,et al.  Combining two strategies to improve perfusion and drug delivery in solid tumors , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  E. Winer,et al.  Drug Resistance in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Brain Metastases: Blame the Barrier or the Brain? , 2018, Clinical Cancer Research.

[23]  R. Jain,et al.  Normalization of tumour blood vessels improves the delivery of nanomedicines in a size-dependent manner , 2012, Nature nanotechnology.

[24]  C. Yeh,et al.  Focused Ultrasound-Induced Blood-Brain Barrier Opening: Association with Mechanical Index and Cavitation Index Analyzed by Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic-Resonance Imaging , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[25]  R. Jain,et al.  Quantifying solid stress and elastic energy from excised or in situ tumors , 2018, Nature Protocols.

[26]  R. Jain,et al.  Preclinical Efficacy of Ado-trastuzumab Emtansine in the Brain Microenvironment. , 2016, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[27]  L. Deangelis,et al.  Treatment of Brain Metastases. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[28]  J. Baselga,et al.  Trastuzumab emtansine for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[29]  R. Jain,et al.  Engineering and physical sciences in oncology: challenges and opportunities , 2017, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[30]  D. Hansel,et al.  Abstract 3652: Pegylated arginine deiminase (ADI-PEG20) as a potential therapeutic agent for rarer variants of bladder cancer that are deficient for argininosuccinate synthetase , 2012 .

[31]  D. Richel,et al.  Anthracycline-trastuzumab regimens for HER2/neu-overexpressing breast cancer: current experience and future strategies. , 2008, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[32]  Xianghua Luo,et al.  Summary report on the graded prognostic assessment: an accurate and facile diagnosis-specific tool to estimate survival for patients with brain metastases. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[33]  Kullervo Hynynen,et al.  Brain arterioles show more active vesicular transport of blood-borne tracer molecules than capillaries and venules after focused ultrasound-evoked opening of the blood-brain barrier. , 2006, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[34]  R K Jain,et al.  Transport of fluid and macromolecules in tumors. III. Role of binding and metabolism. , 1991 .

[35]  Greg M. Thurber,et al.  Single-cell and subcellular pharmacokinetic imaging allows insight into drug action in vivo , 2013, Nature Communications.

[36]  J. Medema,et al.  Therapy-resistant tumor microvascular endothelial cells contribute to treatment failure in glioblastoma multiforme , 2013, Oncogene.

[37]  Dai Fukumura,et al.  Dissecting tumour pathophysiology using intravital microscopy , 2002, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[38]  Timothy J Keyes,et al.  Structural and functional features of central nervous system lymphatics , 2015, Nature.

[39]  Kevin Burrage,et al.  Unlocking data sets by calibrating populations of models to data density: A study in atrial electrophysiology , 2017, Science Advances.

[40]  R K Jain,et al.  Effect of transvascular fluid exchange on pressure-flow relationship in tumors: a proposed mechanism for tumor blood flow heterogeneity. , 1996, Microvascular research.

[41]  K. Uğurbil,et al.  A proof-of-concept study for developing integrated two-photon microscopic and magnetic resonance imaging modality at ultrahigh field of 16.4 tesla , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[42]  T. Secomb,et al.  A mathematical model for comparison of bolus injection, continuous infusion, and liposomal delivery of doxorubicin to tumor cells. , 2000, Neoplasia.

[43]  Ricky T. Tong,et al.  Effect of vascular normalization by antiangiogenic therapy on interstitial hypertension, peritumor edema, and lymphatic metastasis: insights from a mathematical model. , 2007, Cancer research.

[44]  K. Hynynen,et al.  Noninvasive MR imaging-guided focal opening of the blood-brain barrier in rabbits. , 2001, Radiology.

[45]  W. Banks,et al.  From blood–brain barrier to blood–brain interface: new opportunities for CNS drug delivery , 2016, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[46]  R. Jain,et al.  Delivering nanomedicine to solid tumors , 2010, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[47]  Mickael Tanter,et al.  Dynamic Study of Blood–Brain Barrier Closure after its Disruption using Ultrasound: A Quantitative Analysis , 2012, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[48]  R. Jain,et al.  Antiangiogenesis strategies revisited: from starving tumors to alleviating hypoxia. , 2014, Cancer cell.

[49]  R K Jain,et al.  Transport of fluid and macromolecules in tumors. I. Role of interstitial pressure and convection. , 1989, Microvascular research.

[50]  R. Jain,et al.  Role of tumor vascular architecture in nutrient and drug delivery: an invasion percolation-based network model. , 1996, Microvascular research.

[51]  R. Jain,et al.  Emerging strategies for delivering antiangiogenic therapies to primary and metastatic brain tumors☆ , 2017, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[52]  Ferenc A. Jolesz,et al.  Local and reversible blood–brain barrier disruption by noninvasive focused ultrasound at frequencies suitable for trans-skull sonications , 2005, NeuroImage.

[53]  N. McDannold,et al.  Growth inhibition in a brain metastasis model by antibody delivery using focused ultrasound-mediated blood-brain barrier disruption. , 2016, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[54]  R K Jain,et al.  Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling: principles and applications. , 1983, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[55]  Hal Blumenfeld,et al.  Neurostimulation to improve level of consciousness in patients with epilepsy. , 2015, Neurosurgical focus.

[56]  Kullervo Hynynen,et al.  Two-Photon Fluorescence Microscopy Study of Cerebrovascular Dynamics in Ultrasound-Induced Blood—Brain Barrier Opening , 2011, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[57]  R. Jain,et al.  Pharmacokinetic analysis of the perivascular distribution of bifunctional antibodies and haptens: comparison with experimental data. , 1992, Cancer research.

[58]  Natalia Vykhodtseva,et al.  Temporary disruption of the blood-brain barrier by use of ultrasound and microbubbles: safety and efficacy evaluation in rhesus macaques. , 2012, Cancer research.

[59]  Elisa E. Konofagou,et al.  Non-invasive, Focused Ultrasound-Facilitated Gene Delivery for Optogenetics , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[60]  R. Jain,et al.  Emerging strategies for treating brain metastases from breast cancer. , 2015, Cancer cell.

[61]  Nathan McDannold,et al.  Ultrasound-mediated blood-brain barrier disruption for targeted drug delivery in the central nervous system. , 2014, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[62]  Katherine W Ferrara,et al.  Ultrasound increases nanoparticle delivery by reducing intratumoral pressure and increasing transport in epithelial and epithelial-mesenchymal transition tumors. , 2012, Cancer research.

[63]  P. Lockman,et al.  Quantitative Fluorescence Microscopy Measures Vascular Pore Size in Primary and Metastatic Brain Tumors. , 2017, Cancer research.

[64]  Dai Fukumura,et al.  Solid stress and elastic energy as measures of tumour mechanopathology , 2016, Nature Biomedical Engineering.

[65]  John M Lambert,et al.  Targeting HER2-positive breast cancer with trastuzumab-DM1, an antibody-cytotoxic drug conjugate. , 2008, Cancer research.

[66]  A. Kim,et al.  Pulsed ultrasound expands the extracellular and perivascular spaces of the brain , 2016, Brain Research.

[67]  Nathan McDannold,et al.  Ultrasound-mediated blood-brain barrier disruption for targeted drug delivery in the central nervous system , 2014, Defense + Security Symposium.

[68]  C. Yang,et al.  The role of Gliadel wafers in the treatment of newly diagnosed GBM: a meta-analysis , 2015, Drug design, development and therapy.

[69]  E. Hansson,et al.  Astrocyte–endothelial interactions at the blood–brain barrier , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[70]  S. Steinberg,et al.  Alterations in Pericyte Subpopulations Are Associated with Elevated Blood–Tumor Barrier Permeability in Experimental Brain Metastasis of Breast Cancer , 2016, Clinical Cancer Research.

[71]  Lothar Lilge,et al.  Modeling localized delivery of Doxorubicin to the brain following focused ultrasound enhanced blood-brain barrier permeability , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[72]  A. Cohen-Gadol,et al.  Novel delivery methods bypassing the blood-brain and blood-tumor barriers. , 2015, Neurosurgical focus.

[73]  Jun Qian,et al.  Overcoming the blood-brain barrier for delivering drugs into the brain by using adenosine receptor nanoagonist. , 2014, ACS nano.

[74]  Michael M. Schmidt,et al.  A modeling analysis of the effects of molecular size and binding affinity on tumor targeting , 2009, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.