Improving MANET Simulation Results - Deploying Realistic Mobility and Radio Wave Propagation Models

Recent research has shown the poor accuracy of widely used simulators in the area of wireless networks. Beside many other parameters two are of particular interest: (i) the mobility model, and (ii) the radio wave propagation model. The first is responsible for the network topology and the latter for the perception of transmitted data. Both have strong impact on the performance of mobile ad-hoc networks, e.g. the performance of routing protocols changes with these models. We developed a framework combining a realistic mobility model and radio wave propagation model. To generate mobility multiple well understood random mobility models are combined in a scenario graph. The graph also includes obstacles which restrict the movement and the radio wave propagation. The radio wave propagation is calculated using a ray-tracing approach. We present an extensive simulation study on the effect of the mobility and radio wave propagation on simulation results.

[1]  Jason Liu,et al.  Experimental evaluation of wireless simulation assumptions , 2004, MSWiM '04.

[2]  S. Bhatia,et al.  Performance of mobile ad hoc networking routing protocols in realistic scenarios , 2003, IEEE Military Communications Conference, 2003. MILCOM 2003..

[3]  Kevin C. Almeroth,et al.  Towards realistic mobility models for mobile ad hoc networks , 2003, MobiCom '03.

[4]  Jesus Perez,et al.  Efficient ray-tracing techniques for three-dimensional analyses of propagation in mobile communications: application to picocell and microcell scenarios , 1998 .

[5]  Guevara Noubir,et al.  Mobility models for ad hoc network simulation , 2004, IEEE INFOCOM 2004.

[6]  David Kotz,et al.  Extracting a Mobility Model from Real User Traces , 2006, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2006. 25TH IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[7]  Daniel D. Stancil,et al.  Efficient simulation of Ricean fading within a packet simulator , 2000, Vehicular Technology Conference Fall 2000. IEEE VTS Fall VTC2000. 52nd Vehicular Technology Conference (Cat. No.00CH37152).

[8]  Abbas Jamalipour,et al.  Wireless communications , 2005, GLOBECOM '05. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2005..

[9]  Martin Wenig,et al.  The effect of the radio wave propagation model in mobile ad hoc networks , 2006, MSWiM '06.

[10]  Krzysztof Pawlikowski,et al.  On credibility of simulation studies of telecommunication networks , 2002, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[11]  Hannes Hartenstein,et al.  Stochastic properties of the random waypoint mobility model: epoch length, direction distribution, and cell change rate , 2002, MSWiM '02.

[12]  David A. Maltz,et al.  Dynamic Source Routing in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks , 1994, Mobidata.

[13]  Ahmed Helmy,et al.  The IMPORTANT framework for analyzing the Impact of Mobility on Performance Of RouTing protocols for Adhoc NeTworks , 2003, Ad Hoc Networks.

[14]  Paolo Santi,et al.  The Node Distribution of the Random Waypoint Mobility Model for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks , 2003, IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput..

[15]  Jennifer Widom,et al.  Teletraffic modeling for personal communications services , 1997 .

[16]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing , 2001, RFC.

[17]  P. De Doncker,et al.  High-accuracy physical layer model for wireless network simulations in NS-2 , 2004, International Workshop on Wireless Ad-Hoc Networks, 2004..

[18]  Tracy Camp,et al.  A survey of mobility models for ad hoc network research , 2002, Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput..

[19]  Xiaoyan Hong,et al.  A group mobility model for ad hoc wireless networks , 1999, MSWiM '99.