A loss-recovery evaluation tool for debris flow

Abstract In recent years, various severely natural disasters have swept the world, especially the debris flow in geological disaster, which causes huge losses and needs lengthy recovery. This motivates a comprehensive consideration on post-disaster loss and recovery in a closed loop point of view, based on a novel systematic two-stage evaluation method, this study focuses on loss evaluation and emergency resilience decision of debris flow. In the first stage, the weighing technique is applied to a reasonably established index system for loss evaluation. Then, Combined with technique for order preference by similarity to Ideal solution (TOPSIS) and the grey relation analysis (GRA) is utilized to evaluate the loss level of debris flow. In the second stage, an improved restoration triangle model is used to evaluate the post-disaster reconstruction and recovery. In order to solve the complex computational problems, a specific software system was developed to ensure convenience and efficiency in practical applications. The validity of the whole study is verified by case study. The results demonstrate that the proposed method can help decision makers generate strategies in risk management.

[1]  S. Cutter,et al.  Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management Disaster Resilience Indicators for Benchmarking Baseline Conditions , 2011 .

[2]  Suzanne Wilkinson,et al.  An integrated approach: managing resources for post-disaster reconstruction , 2011 .

[3]  Jiuping Xu,et al.  Meta-synthesis pattern of post-disaster recovery and reconstruction: based on actual investigation on 2008 Wenchuan earthquake , 2011, Natural Hazards.

[4]  Li-Jeng Huang,et al.  An FAHP-based Quantitative Method for Risk Assessment of Debris-flow Hazards Using Different Fuzzy Numbers , 2016 .

[5]  Rajeev Rathi,et al.  A fuzzy-MADM based approach for prioritising Six Sigma projects in the Indian auto sector , 2017 .

[6]  C. J. van Westen,et al.  Multi-scale debris flow vulnerability assessment and direct loss estimation of buildings in the Eastern Italian Alps , 2016, Natural Hazards.

[7]  Abdellah Adib,et al.  New Validation Approach Based on Group MADM for Network Selection , 2013, NETYS.

[8]  F. Shi,et al.  Relationships between plant colonization and soil characteristics in the natural recovery of an earthquake-triggered debris flow gully in the Wanglang National Nature Reserve, China , 2016, Journal of Mountain Science.

[9]  M. Kabak,et al.  A GIS-based risk reduction approach for the hazardous materials routing problem in Gaziantep , 2017 .

[10]  Chen Yaning Grey clustering analysis of the disaster losses assessment , 1999 .

[11]  Bijan Sarkar,et al.  Warehouse location selection by fuzzy multi-criteria decision making methodologies based on subjective and objective criteria , 2016 .

[12]  Thomas Glade,et al.  Quantification of model uncertainty in debris flow vulnerability assessment , 2014 .

[13]  James M. Kendra,et al.  Elements of resilience after the World Trade Center disaster: reconstituting New York City's Emergency Operations Centre. , 2003, Disasters.

[14]  Yi Lu,et al.  Critical Systems Thinking on the Inefficiency in Post-Earthquake Relief: A Practice in Longmen Shan Fault Area , 2016 .

[15]  Xiaowei Luo,et al.  Multi-Index Evaluation for Flood Disaster from Sustainable Perspective: A Case Study of Xinjiang in China , 2018, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[16]  C. H. Hulsbergen,et al.  Resilience and vulnerability: coastal dynamics or Dutch dikes? , 1998 .

[17]  G. Tobin Sustainability and community resilience: the holy grail of hazards planning? , 1999 .

[18]  Stephanie E. Chang,et al.  Measuring Improvements in the Disaster Resilience of Communities , 2004 .

[19]  Riyanti Djalante,et al.  Pathways for adaptive and integrated disaster resilience , 2013, Natural Hazards.

[20]  Brent Doberstein,et al.  Post-disaster assessment of hazard mitigation for small and medium-magnitude debris flow disasters in Bali, Indonesia and Jimani, Dominican Republic , 2009 .

[21]  Qiang Xu,et al.  Physical vulnerability models for assessing building damage by debris flows , 2018, Engineering Geology.

[22]  Michel Bruneau,et al.  A Framework to Quantitatively Assess and Enhance the Seismic Resilience of Communities , 2003 .

[23]  Davide Tiranti,et al.  The DEFENSE (debris Flows triggEred by storms - nowcasting system): An early warning system for torrential processes by radar storm tracking using a Geographic Information System (GIS) , 2014, Comput. Geosci..

[24]  A. A. Rybchenko,et al.  Relation between basin morphometric features and dynamic characteristics of debris flows – a case study in Siberia, Russia , 2018, Journal of Mountain Science.

[25]  Eren Özceylan,et al.  GIS-based fuzzy MCDA approach for siting refugee camp: A case study for southeastern Turkey , 2016 .

[26]  Tung-Chiung Chang Risk degree of debris flow applying neural networks , 2007 .

[27]  Xiaobing Yu,et al.  Evaluation of an Agricultural Meteorological Disaster Based on Multiple Criterion Decision Making and Evolutionary Algorithm , 2018, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[28]  A. Rose DEFINING AND MEASURING ECONOMIC RESILIENCE TO DISASTERS , 2004 .

[29]  Colin G. Harrison,et al.  A systems approach to natural disaster resilience , 2016, Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory.

[30]  Hong-Xin Chen,et al.  A physically-based multi-hazard risk assessment platform for regional rainfall-induced slope failures and debris flows , 2016 .

[31]  Cheng Miao,et al.  Large-scale assessment of landslide hazard, vulnerability and risk in China , 2018 .

[32]  Lei Zou,et al.  A synthesis of disaster resilience measurement methods and indices , 2018, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction.

[33]  P. Shi,et al.  Landslide and Debris Flow Disasters in China , 2016 .

[34]  Zhang Ming-yuan A Model for Assessment of Earthquake Damages and Losses Based on Rough Genetic BP Networks , 2010 .

[35]  Xianhua Wu,et al.  Urban flood depth-economic loss curves and their amendment based on resilience: evidence from Lizhong Town in Lixia River and Houbai Town in Jurong River of China , 2016, Natural Hazards.

[36]  Min-Yuan Cheng,et al.  BIM integrated smart monitoring technique for building fire prevention and disaster relief , 2017 .

[37]  Adam Rose,et al.  Economic Resilience Lessons from the ShakeOut Earthquake Scenario , 2011 .

[38]  Hsin-Chi Li,et al.  Debris flow hazard assessment with numerical simulation , 2009 .

[39]  L. Lazzeretti,et al.  Measuring the economic resilience of natural disasters: An analysis of major earthquakes in Japan , 2018, City, Culture and Society.

[40]  Simone Sterlacchini,et al.  Debris flows risk analysis and direct loss estimation: the case study of Valtellina di Tirano, Italy , 2014, Journal of Mountain Science.

[41]  A. Acevedo,et al.  Development of structural debris flow fragility curves (debris flow buildings resistance) using momentum flux rate as a hazard parameter , 2018 .

[42]  Gwo-Fong Lin,et al.  Assessment of Risk due to Debris Flow Events: A Case Study in Central Taiwan , 2006 .

[43]  Song Dongme,et al.  Multiple objective and attribute decision making based on the subjective and objective weighting , 2015 .

[44]  J. Handmer,et al.  A Typology of Resilience: Rethinking Institutions for Sustainable Development , 1996 .

[45]  P. Hoeppe Trends in weather related disasters – Consequences for insurers and society , 2016 .

[46]  Peijun Shi Disaster Measurement, Statistics, and Assessment , 2019 .

[47]  Yuan Yong-b Evaluation of droughts and floods based on fuzzy variable model with combined weights , 2013 .

[48]  Sun Shao A Study on the Contents and Methods of Disaster Assessment , 2001 .

[49]  Yao Yuan,et al.  Study on Model Building for Fast Seismic Disaster Assessment Based on the Habitation , 2012 .

[50]  S. Sepúlveda,et al.  Debris flows in the Andean ranges of central Chile and Argentina triggered by 2013 summer storms: characteristics and consequences , 2015, Landslides.

[51]  C. Rheinberger,et al.  Proportional loss functions for debris flow events , 2013 .

[52]  İbrahim Akgün,et al.  Risk based facility location by using fault tree analysis in disaster management , 2015 .

[53]  Haruo Hayashi,et al.  Process of Housing Damage Assessment: The 1995 Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake Disaster Case , 2003 .

[54]  Yacine Rezgui,et al.  Critical review of existing built environment resilience frameworks: Directions for future research , 2017 .

[55]  Resilient capacity assessment for geological failure areas: examples from communities affected by debris flow disaster , 2009 .

[56]  Nazli Yonca Aydin,et al.  Framework for improving the resilience and recovery of transportation networks under geohazard risks , 2018, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction.

[57]  Yacine Rezgui,et al.  Disaster community resilience assessment method: a consensus-based Delphi and AHP approach , 2015, Natural Hazards.