The Pressures of Assessment in Undergraduate Courses and their Effect on Student Behaviours

267 third-year psychology students from four different UK higher education institutions took part in a study looking at their essay-writing tactics (called 'rules of the game'), cheating behaviours and approaches to studying. The results clearly showed that there was a widespread occurrence of both essay tactics and cheating and that these two types of behaviour correlated positively with each other. The findings relating to approaches to studying showed similar scores for both meaning and reproducing orientations across all four institutions but the correlations with essay tactics and cheating were mostly small. However, 'rules of the game' were found to correlate positively with a deep approach and fear of failure whereas cheating correlated positively with syllabus-boundness and negatively with use of evidence. The authors discuss their findings in relation to the pressures of assessment.

[1]  K. Scouller.  The influence of assessment method on students' learning approaches: Multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay , 1998 .

[2]  D. Boud.  Assessment and the promotion of academic values , 1990 .

[3]  D. Hounsell.  The Experience of Learning: Implications for Teaching and Studying in Higher Education , 1997 .

[4]  David Boud,et al.  Enhancing learning through self assessment , 1995 .

[5]  N. Entwistle,et al.  Approaches to learning, evaluations of teaching, and preferences for contrasting academic environments , 1990 .

[6]  J. Biggs.  Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment , 1996 .

[7]  S. Newstead,et al.  Individual differences in student cheating. , 1996 .

[8]  Stephen E. Newstead,et al.  Undergraduate Cheating: Who Does What and Why?. , 1995 .

[9]  F. Marton,et al.  ON QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING: I—OUTCOME AND PROCESS* , 1976 .

[10]  D. Boud.  Assessment and learning: contradictory or complementary? , 1995 .

[11]  D. Bligh.  Learning to teach in higher education , 1993 .

[12]  N. Entwistle,et al.  EFFECTS OF ACADEMIC DEPARTMENTS ON STUDENTS' APPROACHES TO STUDYING , 1981 .

[13]  Cheating behavior among students of four Moscow institutes , 1995 .

[14]  James C. Sarros,et al.  Undergraduate Student Stress and Coping Strategies , 1989 .

[15]  C. Miller,et al.  Up to the Mark: A Study of the Examination Game. , 1974 .

[16]  John T. E. Richardson,et al.  Reliability and replicability of the Approaches to Studying Questionnaire , 1990 .

[17]  T. Dickins,et al.  Helping Undergraduates to Become More Effective Learners ‐An Evaluation of Two Learning Interventions , 1999 .

[18]  L. Norton,et al.  Can students be helped to learn how to learn? An evaluation of an Approaches to Learning programme for first year degree students , 1995 .

[19]  S. Newstead,et al.  A study of two "quick-and-easy" methods of assessing individual differences in student learning. , 1992, The British journal of educational psychology.

[20]  J. Bligh.  Improving student learning , 2002, Medical education.

[21]  N. Entwistle,et al.  Identifying distinctive approaches to studying , 1979 .

[22]  John T. E. Richardson.  Using questionnaires to evaluate student learning , 1995 .

[23]  Noel Entwistle,et al.  Identifying students at risk through ineffective study strategies , 1996 .