Making sense of the abstraction hierarchy in the power plant domain

The paper discusses the abstraction hierarchy proposed by Rasmussen [(1986) Information processing and human-machine interaction, North-Holland] for design of human-machine interfaces for supervisory control. The purpose of the abstraction hierarchy is to represent a work domain by multiple levels of means-end and part-whole abstractions. It is argued in the paper that the abstraction hierarchy suffers from both methodological and conceptual problems. A cluster of selected problems are analyzed and illustrated by concrete examples from the power plant domain. It is concluded that the semantics of the means-end levels and their relations are vaguely defined and therefore should be improved by making more precise distinctions. Furthermore, the commitment to a fixed number of levels of means-end abstractions should be abandoned and more attention given to the problem of level identification in the model-building process. It is also pointed out that attempts to clarify the semantics of the abstraction hierarchy will invariably reduce the range of work domains where it can be applied.

[1]  Morten Lind,et al.  Status and Challenges of Intelligent Plant Control , 1996 .

[2]  Morten Lind,et al.  Plant modelling for human supervisory control , 1999 .

[3]  Penelope M. Sanderson,et al.  Modeling “Deranged” Physiological Systems for Icu Information System Design , 2000 .

[4]  Cacciabue Piero carlo.  Proceedings of EAM 2000, 19th European Annual Conference on Human Decision making and Manual Control, Ispra, Italy, 26-28 June 2000 , 2000 .

[5]  R. Hursthouse.  THE LOGIC OF DECISION AND ACTION , 1969 .

[6]  R. Cooper.  Process Metaphysics: An Introduction to Process Philosophy , 1996 .

[7]  M. Bunge.  Treatise on basic philosophy , 1974 .

[8]  Johannes Petersen,et al.  FOCUS AND CAUSAL REASONING IN DISTURBANCE MANAGEMENT OF COMPLEX DYNAMIC SYSTEMS , 2022 .

[9]  Kim J. Vicente,et al.  Ecological interface design: theoretical foundations , 1992, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[10]  M. Bunge.  Ethics: The Good and the Right , 1989 .

[11]  Jan Eric Larsson,et al.  Diagnosis Based on Explicit Means-End Models , 1996, Artif. Intell..

[12]  Morten Lind,et al.  Coping with complexity , 2006, Nature.

[13]  Morten Lind,et al.  Modeling goals and functions of complex industrial plants , 1994, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[14]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Information Processing and Human-Machine Interaction: An Approach to Cognitive Engineering , 1986 .

[15]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Information Processing and Human-Machine Interaction , 1986 .

[16]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Cognitive Systems Engineering , 2022 .

[17]  K. J. Vicente,et al.  Cognitive Work Analysis: Toward Safe, Productive, and Healthy Computer-Based Work , 1999 .

[18]  Kim J. Vicente,et al.  Making the abstraction hierarchy concrete , 1994, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[19]  A. Montefiore.  NORM AND ACTION , 1964 .