Empirical Analysis of A Partial Dominance Approach to Many-Objective Optimisation

Studies on standard many-objective optimisation problems have indicated that multi-objective optimisation algorithms struggle to solve optimisation problems with more than three objectives, because many solutions become dominated. Therefore, the Paretodominance relation is no longer efficient in guiding the search to find an optimal Pareto front for many-objective optimisation problems. Recently, a partial dominance approach has been proposed to address the problem experienced with application of the dominance relation on many objectives. Preliminary results have illustrated that this partial dominance relation has promise, and scales well with an increase in the number of objectives. This paper conducts a more extensive empirical analysis of the partial dominance relation on a larger benchmark of difficult many-objective optimisation problems, in comparison to state-of-the-art algorithms. The results further illustrate that partial dominance is an efficient approach to solve many-objective optimisation problems.

[1]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[2]  Zhun Fan,et al.  Decomposing a Multiobjective Optimization Problem into a Number of Reduced-Dimension Multiobjective Subproblems Using Tomographic Scanning , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Industrial Informatics - Computing Technology, Intelligent Technology, Industrial Information Integration.

[3]  Carlos A. Coello Coello,et al.  MOMBI: A new metaheuristic for many-objective optimization based on the R2 indicator , 2013, 2013 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation.

[4]  Yiu-ming Cheung,et al.  Objective Extraction for Many-Objective Optimization Problems: Algorithm and Test Problems , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[5]  Andries Engelbrecht,et al.  Partial Dominance for Many-Objective Optimization , 2020, ISMSI.

[6]  Eckart Zitzler,et al.  Indicator-Based Selection in Multiobjective Search , 2004, PPSN.

[7]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Simulated Binary Crossover for Continuous Search Space , 1995, Complex Syst..

[8]  Kiyoshi Tanaka,et al.  Working principles, behavior, and performance of MOEAs on MNK-landscapes , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  Qingfu Zhang,et al.  Comparison between MOEA/D and NSGA-III on a set of novel many and multi-objective benchmark problems with challenging difficulties , 2019, Swarm Evol. Comput..

[10]  Heike Trautmann,et al.  On the properties of the R2 indicator , 2012, GECCO '12.

[11]  Bernhard Sendhoff,et al.  A Reference Vector Guided Evolutionary Algorithm for Many-Objective Optimization , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[12]  C. Coello,et al.  Improving PSO-based Multi-Objective Optimization using Crowding , Mutation and �-Dominance , 2005 .

[13]  Marco Laumanns,et al.  SPEA2: Improving the strength pareto evolutionary algorithm , 2001 .