An empirical analysis of private brand demand recognising heterogeneous preferences and choice dynamics

Panel data for a frequently bought packaged good is used to explore the determinants of consumer demand for private label brands. The probabilistic modelling of the relationships between consumer characteristics and individual behaviour augments earlier work and identifies important determinants of store brand proneness. An essential methodological contribution lies in the explicit treatment of the role of inter-individual differences and intra-individual dynamics in store brand choice. Particular attention is given to the interpretation of the findings. The results are shown to have important implications for marketing managers and to point to significant directions for future research.

[1]  Arun K. Jain,et al.  Household store brand proneness: A framework , 1996 .

[2]  C. W. Park,et al.  Familiarity and Its Impact on Consumer Decision Biases and Heuristics , 1981 .

[3]  John A. Quelch,et al.  Brands Versus Private Labels: Fighting to Win , 1996 .

[4]  R. Rao.  Pricing and Promotions in Asymmetric Duopolies , 1991 .

[5]  D. McFadden.  Econometric analysis of qualitative response models , 1984 .

[6]  J. S. Cramer,et al.  The Logit Model: An Introduction for Economists , 1991 .

[7]  C. Manski.  The structure of random utility models , 1977 .

[8]  Jagmohan S. Raju,et al.  The introduction and performance of store brands , 1995 .

[9]  Cheng Hsiao,et al.  Logit and Probit Models , 1992 .

[10]  J. W. Hutchinson,et al.  Dimensions of Consumer Expertise , 1987 .

[11]  James R. Bettman,et al.  Relationship of information-processing attitude structures to private brand purchasing behavior. , 1974 .

[12]  D. McFadden.  Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[13]  A. Jain,et al.  Extrinsic and Intrinsic Cue Effects on Perceptions of Store Brand Quality , 1994 .

[14]  Tanniru R. Rao,et al.  Are Some Consumers More Prone to Purchase Private Brands? , 1969 .

[15]  Stephen J. Hoch,et al.  How Should National Brands Think about Private Labels , 1996 .

[16]  G Baltas,et al.  A model of consumer choice for national vs private label brands , 1997 .

[17]  K. Sivakumar.  Quality-tier competition and optimal pricing , 1995 .

[18]  P. Burger,et al.  Can Private Brand Buyers be Identified? , 1972 .

[19]  Robert C. Blattberg,et al.  Price-Induced Patterns of Competition , 1989 .

[20]  Robert A. Moffitt,et al.  A COMPUTATIONALLY EFFICIENT QUADRATURE PROCEDURE FOR THE ONE-FACTOR MULTINOMIAL PROBIT MODEL , 1982 .

[21]  F. Livesey,et al.  Factors Affecting Consumers' Choice between Manufacturer Brands and Retailer Own Labels , 1978 .

[22]  John R. Hauser,et al.  Testing the Accuracy, Usefulness, and Significance of Probabilistic Choice Models: An Information-Theoretic Approach , 1978, Oper. Res..

[23]  J. M. Jones,et al.  Removing Heterogeneity Bias from Logit Model Estimation , 1988 .

[24]  A. Wolinsky.  Brand Names and Price Discrimination , 1987 .

[25]  Bart J. Bronnenberg,et al.  Asymmetric Promotion Effects and Brand Positioning , 1996 .

[26]  J. Bettman,et al.  Effects of Prior Knowledge and Experience and Phase of the Choice Process on Consumer Decision Processes: A Protocol Analysis , 1980 .

[27]  David M. Szymanski,et al.  Identifying the Generics-Prone Consumer: A Meta-Analysis , 1987 .

[28]  D. McFadden.  Econometric Models for Probabilistic Choice Among Products , 1980 .

[29]  T. Amemiya.  QUALITATIVE RESPONSE MODELS: A SURVEY , 1981 .

[30]  A. Gallant.  Testing a Subset of the Parameters of a Nonlinear Regression Model , 1975 .