CWDAT - An Open-Source Tool for the Visualization and Analysis of Community-Generated Water Quality Data

Citizen science initiatives span a wide range of topics, designs, and research needs. Despite this heterogeneity, there are several common barriers to the uptake and sustainability of citizen science projects and the information they generate. One key barrier often cited in the citizen science literature is data quality. Open-source tools for the analysis, visualization, and reporting of citizen science data hold promise for addressing the challenge of data quality, while providing other benefits such as technical capacity-building, increased user engagement, and reinforcing data sovereignty. We developed an operational citizen science tool called the Community Water Data Analysis Tool (CWDAT)—a R/Shiny-based web application designed for community-based water quality monitoring. Surveys and facilitated user-engagement were conducted among stakeholders during the development of CWDAT. Targeted recruitment was used to gather feedback on the initial CWDAT prototype’s interface, features, and potential to support capacity building in the context of community-based water quality monitoring. Fourteen of thirty-two invited individuals (response rate 44%) contributed feedback via a survey or through facilitated interaction with CWDAT, with eight individuals interacting directly with CWDAT. Overall, CWDAT was received favourably. Participants requested updates and modifications such as water quality thresholds and indices that reflected well-known barriers to citizen science initiatives related to data quality assurance and the generation of actionable information. Our findings support calls to engage end-users directly in citizen science tool design and highlight how design can contribute to users’ understanding of data quality. Enhanced citizen participation in water resource stewardship facilitated by tools such as CWDAT may provide greater community engagement and acceptance of water resource management and policy-making.

[1]  R. Jordan,et al.  Knowledge Gain and Behavioral Change in Citizen‐Science Programs , 2011, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[2]  Christopher J.A. Macleod,et al.  What Do Users Really Need? Participatory Development of Decision Support Tools for Environmental Management Based on Outcomes , 2017 .

[3]  K. Somers,et al.  Testing against “normal” with environmental data , 2017, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[4]  M. Haklay,et al.  What do volunteers want from citizen science technologies? A systematic literature review and best practice guidelines , 2019, Journal of Science Communication.

[5]  Jaume Piera,et al.  Developing Mobile Applications for Environmental and Biodiversity Citizen Science: Considerations and Recommendations , 2018, Multimedia Tools and Applications for Environmental & Biodiversity Informatics.

[6]  Jane Hunter,et al.  Assessing the quality and trustworthiness of citizen science data , 2013, Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp..

[7]  Maria E. Fernandez-Gimenez,et al.  Adaptive Management and Social Learning in Collaborative and Community-Based Monitoring: a Study of Five Community-Based Forestry Organizations in the western USA , 2008 .

[8]  Simon French,et al.  Decision support systems , 2007, CACM.

[9]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  Assuring the quality of volunteered geographic information , 2012 .

[10]  Peter Brenton,et al.  Technology infrastructure for citizen science , 2018, Citizen Science.

[11]  Francis Harvey,et al.  Boundary Objects and the Social Construction of GIS Technology , 1998 .

[12]  Sabrina Kirschke,et al.  Success factors for citizen science projects in water quality monitoring. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[13]  Carlo Giupponi,et al.  Environmental decision support systems: Current issues, methods and tools , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[14]  Lisl Klein,et al.  What do we actually mean by 'sociotechnical'? On values, boundaries and the problems of language. , 2014, Applied ergonomics.

[15]  Bo Markussen,et al.  What determines spatial bias in citizen science? Exploring four recording schemes with different proficiency requirements , 2016 .

[16]  Joshua D Werts,et al.  An Integrated WebGIS Framework for Volunteered Geographic Information and Social Media in Soil and Water Conservation , 2012, Environmental Management.

[17]  Maria Arias de Reyna,et al.  Empowering citizen science through free and open source GIS , 2016, Open Geospatial Data, Software and Standards.

[18]  Jan Peters-Anders,et al.  INTERACTIVE SPATIAL WEB-APPLICATIONS AS NEW MEANS OF SUPPORT FOR URBAN DECISION-MAKING PROCESSES , 2018, SDSC 2018.

[19]  Hansi Senaratne,et al.  A review of volunteered geographic information quality assessment methods , 2017, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[20]  Arnold K. Bregt,et al.  Spatial decision support systems: Exploring differences in pilot-testing with students vs. professionals , 2018, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[21]  Caren B. Cooper,et al.  Data validation in citizen science: a case study from Project FeederWatch , 2012 .

[22]  M. Haklay Citizen Science and Volunteered Geographic Information: Overview and Typology of Participation , 2013 .

[23]  R. Bonney,et al.  Next Steps for Citizen Science , 2014, Science.

[24]  John Darlington,et al.  Design Guidelines for the User-Centred Collaborative Citizen Science Platforms , 2016, Hum. Comput..

[25]  S. Loiselle,et al.  Getting the full picture: Assessing the complementarity of citizen science and agency monitoring data , 2017, PloS one.

[26]  Bethany Alender Understanding volunteer motivations to participate in citizen science projects: a deeper look at water quality monitoring , 2016 .

[27]  G H Huang,et al.  Barriers to sustainable water-quality management. , 2001, Journal of environmental management.

[28]  Josephine Gillespie,et al.  ‘Here be dragons’: Integrating scientific data and place-based observation for environmental management , 2016 .

[29]  Mark S. Johnson,et al.  Citizen science for water quality monitoring: Data implications of citizen perspectives. , 2017, Journal of environmental management.

[30]  Lucy Bastin,et al.  VGI QUALITY CONTROL , 2015 .

[31]  Tomas J. Bird,et al.  Statistical solutions for error and bias in global citizen science datasets , 2014 .

[32]  M Poch,et al.  Validation of a decision support tool for wastewater treatment selection. , 2016, Journal of environmental management.

[33]  R. Rossetto,et al.  Free and open-source GIS-integrated hydrogeological analysis tool: an application for coastal aquifer systems , 2020, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[34]  Alice Cohen,et al.  Linking community-based monitoring to water policy: Perceptions of citizen scientists. , 2018, Journal of environmental management.

[35]  Steffen Fritz,et al.  Assessing the Accuracy of Volunteered Geographic Information arising from Multiple Contributors to an Internet Based Collaborative Project , 2013, Trans. GIS.

[36]  M. Kelly,et al.  Citizen Science in the Age of Neogeography: Utilizing Volunteered Geographic Information for Environmental Monitoring , 2012 .

[37]  Rebecca Logsdon Muenich,et al.  The Wabash Sampling Blitz: A Study on the Effectiveness of Citizen Science , 2016 .

[38]  Alexander Y. Sun,et al.  Development of multi-metamodels to support surface water quality management and decision making , 2014, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[39]  B Weeser,et al.  Citizen science pioneers in Kenya - A crowdsourced approach for hydrological monitoring. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[40]  Rudy Rossetto,et al.  AkvaGIS: An open source tool for water quantity and quality management , 2019, Comput. Geosci..

[41]  Krista G. Hilchey,et al.  A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: issues and opportunities , 2011, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[42]  John Gowing,et al.  Filling the observational void: Scientific value and quantitative validation of hydrometeorological data from a community-based monitoring programme , 2016 .

[43]  Margaret Kosmala,et al.  Assessing data quality in citizen science (preprint) , 2016, bioRxiv.

[44]  Matthias Braun,et al.  SOVEREIGNTY AND DATA SHARING , 2018 .

[45]  Jongho Keum,et al.  Development of a decision-making methodology to design a water quality monitoring network , 2015, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.

[46]  G. Brent Hall,et al.  Community-based production of geographic information using open source software and Web 2.0 , 2010, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[47]  V. J. MacPhail,et al.  Power of the people: A review of citizen science programs for conservation , 2020 .